Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

benhur

Senior Member
Feb 8, 2018
1,534
121
63
The Greek Septuagint had multiple errors in it, most of the OLDER English Translations we Septuagint based, so they copied the errors over, and YES one of the goals of the KJV Translation Team WAS to correct those known errors in those 5 older English Translations, AND OBVIOUSLY they missed some. They were not the GOD INSPIRED TRANSLATORS that you and many others, supposed that they were. THEY OPENLY ADMITTED, they Could make errors, and wanted others to come along letter, and if need be CORRECT they errors.


YOU put the KJV, way to high on a pedestal, than the Original Translation Team intended it to be.


By the Way, in that verse, if YE LOVE, is in the Present Tense, NOT LIKE OUR PRESENT TENSE; as it implies a LOVE that WILL NEVER END PERIOD, an ongoing LOVE FOR CHRIST. Therefore "IF YE LOVE ME, you WILL keep my commands", which would make it implied. The WORD KEEP does not have a LITERAL TRANSLATION, because it is in the Aorist Tense, and ENGLISH does not have Aorist Tense VERBS.
So are you saying my bible is not infallible? I thought some Christians depend on that saying, that the bible is infallible.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,550
17,022
113
69
Tennessee
So are you saying my bible is not infallible? I thought some Christians depend on that saying, that the bible is infallible.
God knew how all the major translations and versions would turn it and there is no error, only misunderstanding. Your bible is fact infallible as it is the Word of God.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
According to the bible pal.....Maybe your creed loving anti-biblical stance fuela your ignorance of the truth, but that does not change the fact that baptizo means to immerse and equals being put UNDER THE GROUND.....I suppose when one dies in your family you just chunk them on the ground and toss a handful of dirt on them......good luck....there is but one means of biblical baptism.....and pouring or sprinkling does not match scripture nor the word itself.....
ROFL
When I researched it many years ago there was a word about dying cloth and another word for washing feet. The former implies immersion but the latter implies pouring or sprinkling. Therefore I reject your immersion only version. Many denominations reject it as well.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
So are you saying my bible is not infallible? I thought some Christians depend on that saying, that the bible is infallible.
You then misunderstand the issue. The original language of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Judean Greek are infallible but translations are done by fallible men. They use a group to keep errors at a minimum but they creep in anyway.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
God knew how all the major translations and versions would turn it and there is no error, only misunderstanding. Your bible is fact infallible as it is the Word of God.
I hate to disillusion you but small errors are known to exist in translations. That is why for a long time there were Bibles printed with 4 translations side by side.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
God knew how all the major translations and versions would turn it and there is no error, only misunderstanding. Your bible is fact infallible as it is the Word of God.
Are you saying that God intervened in the translations? If not then normal human error happened.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
According to the bible pal.....Maybe your creed loving anti-biblical stance fuela your ignorance of the truth, but that does not change the fact that baptizo means to immerse and equals being put UNDER THE GROUND.....I suppose when one dies in your family you just chunk them on the ground and toss a handful of dirt on them......good luck....there is but one means of biblical baptism.....and pouring or sprinkling does not match scripture nor the word itself.....
Being insulting now are you. Great way to witness.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,550
17,022
113
69
Tennessee
I hate to disillusion you but small errors are known to exist in translations. That is why for a long time there were Bibles printed with 4 translations side by side.
OK, if we can't believe the bible then that doesn't leave much to believe in does it? If what you say is true then I'm sure that if you tried real hard you could find an error or discrepancy in any version or translation. How do you really know for sure that if there was an error that the scribe that made the so-called error was not directed by the Holy Spirit to do so.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,550
17,022
113
69
Tennessee
Are you saying that God intervened in the translations? If not then normal human error happened.
God absolutely guided the process of all translations and major versions of the bible, otherwise it would not be the Word of God. Even if normal human error did happen it only happened because God allowed it to happen, otherwise there would be nothing to debate, discuss, or debase in these types of threads or other similar conversations.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
And you keep lying and spreading false statements....I have addressed James numerous times in Context.....which alludes you due to you adherance to a creed and the same Catholic dogma you espouse.
I rejected your version. I go with what the Bible plainly states. The whole Bible on a given topic. I use Berkhofs Systematic Theology to research all verses on a topic. How do you research all verses on a topic? It is very insulting to accuse me of adhering to Catholic dogma. Why are you so hate filled? This is a Christian site and you ignore why the early church elders created first the Roman Creed in the 200s and updated it in 390 to the Apostles Creed. Why are you so egotistical to disregard the elders reasons for creating it back then and the need for it now. It is a statement of basic Christian doctrine. I have asked before for you to tell what errors it contains but you repeatedly ignore that question.

History
In the early church there were heresies and legitimate differences of opinion. The Roman Creed of the 200s was created and later updated to the Apostles Creed. It defined non heretical doctrine and allowed differences of opinion outside of what it stated.

With this being the reason for it either explain its errors or shut up about it!! Nothing is wrong with a factual statement of doctrine unless it contains errors. What are the errors?
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
OK, if we can't believe the bible then that doesn't leave much to believe in does it? If what you say is true then I'm sure that if you tried real hard you could find an error or discrepancy in any version or translation. How do you really know for sure that if there was an error that the scribe that made the so-called error was not directed by the Holy Spirit to do so.
That is why I use biblegateway.com. It allows looking up a book and chapter with a specific translation. Then you can change translations and see the differences between them. By comparing different translations the small errors are easily rejected. I normally use NIV and AMPC. NIV is a good modern translation and AMPC gives more detail by giving all translations of the original language word. Here is John 3:16 in 4 translations. Note the AMPC version with more information.

John 3:16 KJV
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

John 3:16 NIV
16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

John 3:16 ESV
16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

John 3 AMPC Amplified Classic
16 For God so greatly loved and dearly prized the world that He [even] gave up His only begotten (unique) Son, so that whoever believes in (trusts in, clings to, relies on) Him shall not perish (come to destruction, be lost) but have eternal (everlasting) life.
 
J

joefizz

Guest
That is why I use biblegateway.com. It allows looking up a book and chapter with a specific translation. Then you can change translations and see the differences between them. By comparing different translations the small errors are easily rejected. I normally use NIV and AMPC. NIV is a good modern translation and AMPC gives more detail by giving all translations of the original language word. Here is John 3:16 in 4 translations. Note the AMPC version with more information.

John 3:16 KJV
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

John 3:16 NIV
16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

John 3:16 ESV
16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

John 3 AMPC Amplified Classic
16 For God so greatly loved and dearly prized the world that He [even] gave up His only begotten (unique) Son, so that whoever believes in (trusts in, clings to, relies on) Him shall not perish (come to destruction, be lost) but have eternal (everlasting) life.
So let me get this straight you are trusting a site to do research which statistically could be in "error" in order to clarify supposed "errors" in the bible?
Yet somehow the bible translations that you could "read for yourself" you do not trust because you don't trust who wrote them and believe them to have errors because of this?
:confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

benhur

Senior Member
Feb 8, 2018
1,534
121
63
Most evangelicals word in their Doctrinal Statement of Faith, a portion that EMPHASIZES the ONLY INERRANT BIBLE that we can be sure of:


1. The Scriptures

We believe in the plenary and verbal inspiration and authority of all sixty-six books of the Old and New Testaments as the divinely inspired Word of God and submit to them as the only infallible authority in all matters of faith and practice, the original documents of which are inerrant as to fact and infallible as to truth.
Since we have none of the original documents, does that make that statement irrelevant?
 
J

joefizz

Guest
I rejected your version. I go with what the Bible plainly states. The whole Bible on a given topic. I use Berkhofs Systematic Theology to research all verses on a topic. How do you research all verses on a topic? It is very insulting to accuse me of adhering to Catholic dogma. Why are you so hate filled? This is a Christian site and you ignore why the early church elders created first the Roman Creed in the 200s and updated it in 390 to the Apostles Creed. Why are you so egotistical to disregard the elders reasons for creating it back then and the need for it now. It is a statement of basic Christian doctrine. I have asked before for you to tell what errors it contains but you repeatedly ignore that question.

History
In the early church there were heresies and legitimate differences of opinion. The Roman Creed of the 200s was created and later updated to the Apostles Creed. It defined non heretical doctrine and allowed differences of opinion outside of what it stated.

With this being the reason for it either explain its errors or shut up about it!! Nothing is wrong with a factual statement of doctrine unless it contains errors. What are the errors?
You just stated the errors multiple times in your post,like adhering "plainly" to scripture and doctrine,trusting a theology system instead of trusting God's word through reading it without a window in the way,and trusting in a creed basically that was made in an attempt to bring together people universally to one church and belief system.(similar to the tower of Babel)
 

benhur

Senior Member
Feb 8, 2018
1,534
121
63
Hi Ben...First of all , no where did i imply that i am a puppet , nothing of the sort...It is God who wills to do His good through me...How do I do the will of God , by reading His word daily , by feeding on it until it fills me up , then daily I go about my business according to His word , and when I fail , I come to Him in humbleness and take my correction...

It is the word of God who helps us become who He is changing us to be...Also we have His Holy Spirit , the Helper to aid us through all things...He is the one who directs our paths , unless you are addressing fake believers , then you would be right , but not true children of God , God`s children do according to His will , He is our Father , we hear His voice , we follow Him...xox...
He is our Father, we do hear His voice, good Christians follow. Thank you.
 

Endoscopy

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2017
4,028
400
83
God knew how all the major translations and versions would turn it and there is no error, only misunderstanding. Your bible is fact infallible as it is the Word of God.
Blind misplaced faith. Most translations are done by teams to reduce errors. But they are human and make mistakes. That is the great thing about biblegateway.com, select a translation and click and up pops that translation for book and chapter. You can even select foreign languages so it works worldwide. Have a browser on the internet and you have the Bible at your fingertips. Great for smart phones.
 
Mar 6, 2018
27
12
3
All it means is that we will not be able to rely on our works to get to heaven.. Is it a biblical contradiction than to say Faith without works is dead? Its very simple. Matthew 25 explains what happens when we don't take care of those in need....No need to complicate God's word to create something out of nothing... I was shown today what the entirety of God's Word is. Its like without all the bricks, there is no temple. We seek to find scripture by Chapter and verse to create an understanding for ourselves, but the Word is not up for personal interpretation. Think of one verse being one brick of the temple. You have to have all the bricks. We are the entirety of the Word. We should seek to help others, love without condition, not judge ones salvation, but judge who they claim by their fruits. Works is something that belongs to the flow of the Spirit, and the path created by Christ to righteousness. When we try and take these discussions over the importance of doing the work of the Father, we are not seeing the entire Gospel, but are trying to create doctrine through carnal understanding. Quit complicating the Word. What you read, is what is meant. Don't try yourselves to be more approved than another by remembrance of scripture....What do you gain by confusing something you already to be too confusing to understand. Its not really. Its so simple even a fool can not error in it. All we do when we discuss these topics, and put our opinion to it, is confusing the lost and the new. We should be happy and glad we have the word. It's very troubling to see what has become of the precious Word of God.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,401
113
court room? well... i sure hope i dont have to plead my case..... i was hoping for an advocate

someone much more qualified and capable than myself
Exactly...His name is Jesus and he is our Advocate....and our overwhelming guilt has been nailed to the cross, scrubbed and hidden by the blood of Christ and we have been saved eternally by faith through grace with no works, religious hoop jumping or false law keeping farce added....
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,401
113
ROFL
When I researched it many years ago there was a word about dying cloth and another word for washing feet. The former implies immersion but the latter implies pouring or sprinkling. Therefore I reject your immersion only version. Many denominations reject it as well.
Good for you pal....no surprise you reject it...your religion has roots that reek of Catholicism....and in the most simplest terms...

a. You're wrong and the only valid, biblical baptism is immersion

b. I could care less what false religions espouse

NEXT!