Now I want to address the above false accusation, and show why it is false.
For the record I've done nothing that you accuse above and there is nothing "dangerous" in what I say. Please end the "you got a doctrine then went to the Bible to support it" false accusation. It's your understanding that is at fault, not my methodology. You've offered not one response showing that I've taken a passage out of context, yet you accuse without substantiation. Do you think your accusation is fair when you have not one thing to go by to prove it? Please employ a just balance bro, Proverbs 16:11.
Remember where I showed you how you misused John 3:36, making it out to mean "loss of salvation" when it isn't even remotely in the context? The context is the saved and the lost, not the saved and the one's who used to be saved. You got all bent out of shape, said your "blood boiled" when I showed you this, spoke of how you taught exegesis, but the fact remains you did misuse the text.
Why not just admit you've misused it, took an idea of what you have come to believe, and went to Scripture to make it support said belief out of context? It's hard to have any honest dialog when the person won't concede to their error and just carry on as if they cannot take correction.
I'll put it to you like this: Show us all one scholar or Bible commentary that concludes John 3:36 means the person lost salvation. Just one.
To be honest you've described your own faulty methodology and have been on a polemical path against "faith alone" while just now beginning (perhaps) to understand what we mean by Sola Fide. You're also not understanding Sola Gratia which is why you're using Ephesians 2:8-9 against Sola Fide.
This is why I say it really helps to use the language the Bible uses so we can know what a person is talking about. When a person says 'faith alone' that's a reference to James' argument, not Paul's.You have admitted there is no Scripture that says that we are saved by "faith alone". That is why I do not make the statement that I am "saved by faith alone". Do you have a problem with that?
If you want to make the statement that we are saved by faith alone, I think I have the right to ask you to explain it and challenge you on what it means.
You need to understand the word impute from the Christian perspective.
Imputation is used to designate any action or word or thing as reckoned to a person. Thus in doctrinal language
(1) the sin of Adam is imputed to all his descendants, i.e., it is reckoned as theirs, and they are dealt with therefore as guilty;
(2) the righteousness of Christ is imputed to them that believe in him, or so attributed to them as to be considered their own; and
(3) our sins are imputed to Christ, i.e., he assumed our "law-place," undertook to answer the demands of justice for our sins. In all these cases the nature of imputation is the same ( Romans 5:12-19 ; Compare Philemon 1:18 Philemon 1:19 ).
This is why I say it really helps to use the language the Bible uses so we can know what a person is talking about. When a person says 'faith alone' that's a reference to James' argument, not Paul's.
What most Christians mean when they say 'salvation by faith alone' is 'justification by faith apart from works'. But by using James' 'faith alone' to talk about Paul's 'by faith apart from works' argument the true meaning of both are lost in confusion.
What does it matter if you stand before Christ when he comes back and you have no works and are tossed into the furnace because you never believed to begin with or you have no works and are lost because you lost your salvation along the way?Just making a point about the seed of the Word being active within us to eternal life. So how could we ever be rejected, when we have already been called, heard the call and received, chosen, sealed within for eternity. What's to be left to save? Is it not soul, and body?
Not trying to get into any other doctrines here. Just using your post to add this info, that I've seen. And our security in Him. For many arevtrying to undermine this.
I already showed you that if Paul meant he was living in sin per Galatians 5:21, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, and Ephesians 5:5 then he would be condemning himself as being one who would 'not inherit the kingdom of God'. So obviously you can not interpret the passage about him being chief of sinners to mean he is living in sin and will not inherit the kingdom of God. He would not say that about himself. He would be contradicting his own doctrine. (As an side, he had Christians put to death, that's what he's talking about.)
Born again people don't 'live in' sin. They sin but they do not live in it as a matter of lifestyle like unbelievers do. If a person is doing that, they are not born again. Those made righteous by faith in Christ grow up in righteous living. While those who are not righteous in Christ, not only do not change, they get worse-2 Timothy 3:13. They show by their behavior that they do not know God.
I did already.
The child born of God does not 'live in' sin. Even you made the distinction between sinning after being born again and 'living in sin' when you said that believers should not 'live like the devil'. So obviously even you see the difference. The child of God can not live like the devil or he is showing himself to be a child of the devil, not a child of God growing up and away from the slavery of sin. Slaves do not inherit the kingdom. Only the sons do.
If someone sees themselves in the mirror of Galatians 5:21 one of three things is going to happen. They will see the truth about themselves and be driven to Christ for mercy and will receive the power to change. That's called the gospel, by the way. Or, they will see the truth about themselves and try real hard to not be like that anymore. Or, what we're seeing in the church today, they will think it's okay to be that way as long as you believe, and God will take care of the rest.
Which one is you? Which one is me? We all have to examine ourselves to see which we are.
You are a gentleman and a scholar.Some real wisdom in what you say here Ralph
What does it matter if you stand before Christ when he comes back and you have no works and are tossed into the furnace because you never believed to begin with or you have no works and are lost because you lost your salvation along the way?
That subject really has no bearing on whether or not we have to have works to be the saved and go into the kingdom at the return of Christ and not into the furnace. What matters is that you have works to show that you are among the believing who go into the kingdom and not into the furnace. How does once saved always saved change that truth? Does it?
I'm just agreeing with what you are saying.Some real wisdom in what you say here Ralph
John/Yahanan 15:5-16, “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, produces much fruit; but without Me, you can do nothing. If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away like a branch, and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned. If you abide in Me, and letting My words; abide in you, you will ask what you will, and it will be done for you. In this is My Father glorified: when you produce much fruit; and in this way you become My disciples. Just as the Father has loved Me, so have I loved you; continue in My love. If you keep My Commands, you will abide in My love; just as I have kept My Father's Commands, and abide in His love. These things I have spoken to you, that My joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be complete. This is My Command: Love one another as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: that one would lay down his life on behalf of his brothers. You are My brothers, if you do whatever I command you.”
That's right, eternal torment is for the wicked unsaved. That's why if we see ourselves in passages that describe the wicked who will not inherit the kingdom of God we have to examine ourselves. Once saved always saved doesn't change it so you and I can live in wickedness and we WILL inherit the kingdom of God. Understand?You are flippant with your words of eternal torment. That's forvthecwicked who reject God in every way.
John/Yahanan 15:5-16, “I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in Me, and I in him, produces much fruit; but without Me, you can do nothing. If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away like a branch, and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned. If you abide in Me, and letting My words; abide in you, you will ask what you will, and it will be done for you. In this is My Father glorified: when you produce much fruit; and in this way you become My disciples. Just as the Father has loved Me, so have I loved you; continue in My love. If you keep My Commands, you will abide in My love; just as I have kept My Father's Commands, and abide in His love. These things I have spoken to you, that My joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be complete. This is My Command: Love one another as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this: that one would lay down his life on behalf of his brothers. You are My brothers, if you do whatever I command you.”
Well, abide in Him. Stay in His truth. Trust in His work. His blood is still on the mercy seat. It's living and of power with Father for ALL MANKIND.
Is your good news good?
If you read in John 3 Amplified Classic version the word translated beleve has more than a simple belief. It implies action as a result. Clings to makes me think of a toddler clinging to dad's leg while he walks. Mine did it to me and I have witnessed it in other families.This is why I say it really helps to use the language the Bible uses so we can know what a person is talking about. When a person says 'faith alone' that's a reference to James' argument, not Paul's.
What most Christians mean when they say 'salvation by faith alone' is 'justification by faith apart from works'. But by using James' 'faith alone' to talk about Paul's 'by faith apart from works' argument the true meaning of both are lost in confusion.
Some real wisdom in what you say here Ralph
You are a gentleman and a scholar.
"Is my good news good?"
So what are you implying here?
and
Do you accept that entire passage?