As we look at Gen.6:3-4 We find some things of interest.
Gen 6:3 And the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he is indeed flesh; yet his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.”
Here we find that man kind is indeed flesh. If looked at from the surface, some may think, "Well ya." This however by almost everyone is not seen in this manner. I think we can all agree that here HaShem is looking at the heart of man, rather than his mortality. This is further backed by verse 5 as well see.
Gen 6:4 There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
As afterward. This I am sure we can all agree is talking of the day's after the flood. Yet is there any other teaching on this out there? I only know of one. It claims that afterward is used to indicate the time that elapsed from the opening of this chapter, until the flood started. As the flood ended all forms of life that were on the earth at that time.
I am sorry I can't help it. I must give my own thoughts on this, as I simply can't sit back and let this form of teaching go unanswered.
If that teach was ever close to right, then I ask, why did HaShem save Noah, and his family? That in of it's self has the ability to carry blood lines through the flood, and hens would negate this kind of teaching, would it not. After all, we know that there were giants in the time of King Davide. As well as when the spies went in to spy out the land. So where did they come from?
Gen 10:6 The sons of Ham were Cush, Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.
Gen 10:15 ¶Canaan begot Sidon his firstborn, and Heth;
Gen 10:17 the Hivite, the Arkite, and the Sinite;
I am giving the short blood line of the above as we need to understand where the giants came from.
Num 13:33 “There we saw the giants (the descendants of Anak came from the giants); and we were like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.”
What most will agree on is that Ham's wife cared the blood line of the giants through the flood. Though it is sledom that one hears that this blood line was from Satan. I have no clue why this teaching seems to stop with the flood, or what anyone would hope to gain from a teaching of that kid. What we do find, is that the teaching of the son's of god as being rulers, does seem to fit a bit better now. Yet their is still questions that has not been answered by ether side.
1 If giants are the son's of the fallen, would they be seen as demigods?
2 If they are not children of the fallen, What about the transformation that mad them giants?
Gen 6:5 Then the LORD[fn] saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Do we not still struggle with this today? Take a look at big Rx. They push pills on us that in many cases, can lead to bigger problems than we started with. Government removing HaShem from school's and pushing to have Him remove from any public forum. Trying to force church's to pro-forum same sex marriages, and the list can get rather long.
This also gives a hint hat HaShem was not looking at the mortality of ma kind, rather the intent of his heart. Seeing the need to help man kind understand this, HaShem also found fit to give a hand full of commandments to man kind after the flood. As we are not there yet, it seems right to hold off on that.
Gen 6:8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.
Was this grace found in Noah's works, or was it found in his faith?
Once more their 2 sides to that. One makes the claim that salvation by works was the only way to find it. The other, makes the claim that faith was never by works, rather has always been by faith. As the Story unfolds, we find that Noah never asked, "Are you sure about this ark thing? I mean it has never rained in all my days, so how can I be sure of this?" No Noah just goes on and starts work on the ark, not asking why, or if it was really a good idea at all. The Word never tells us it was by faith, rather it show Noah's faith by his action. Does the Word show us Noah's salvation by his works? I think not, after all, what did Noah do when he first got off the ark? That's right boy's and girl's, he got drunk. As we will come to that in time, I am going to let it go for now.
Gen 6:3 And the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he is indeed flesh; yet his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.”
Here we find that man kind is indeed flesh. If looked at from the surface, some may think, "Well ya." This however by almost everyone is not seen in this manner. I think we can all agree that here HaShem is looking at the heart of man, rather than his mortality. This is further backed by verse 5 as well see.
Gen 6:4 There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
As afterward. This I am sure we can all agree is talking of the day's after the flood. Yet is there any other teaching on this out there? I only know of one. It claims that afterward is used to indicate the time that elapsed from the opening of this chapter, until the flood started. As the flood ended all forms of life that were on the earth at that time.
I am sorry I can't help it. I must give my own thoughts on this, as I simply can't sit back and let this form of teaching go unanswered.
If that teach was ever close to right, then I ask, why did HaShem save Noah, and his family? That in of it's self has the ability to carry blood lines through the flood, and hens would negate this kind of teaching, would it not. After all, we know that there were giants in the time of King Davide. As well as when the spies went in to spy out the land. So where did they come from?
Gen 10:6 The sons of Ham were Cush, Mizraim, Put, and Canaan.
Gen 10:15 ¶Canaan begot Sidon his firstborn, and Heth;
Gen 10:17 the Hivite, the Arkite, and the Sinite;
I am giving the short blood line of the above as we need to understand where the giants came from.
Num 13:33 “There we saw the giants (the descendants of Anak came from the giants); and we were like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.”
What most will agree on is that Ham's wife cared the blood line of the giants through the flood. Though it is sledom that one hears that this blood line was from Satan. I have no clue why this teaching seems to stop with the flood, or what anyone would hope to gain from a teaching of that kid. What we do find, is that the teaching of the son's of god as being rulers, does seem to fit a bit better now. Yet their is still questions that has not been answered by ether side.
1 If giants are the son's of the fallen, would they be seen as demigods?
2 If they are not children of the fallen, What about the transformation that mad them giants?
Gen 6:5 Then the LORD[fn] saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Do we not still struggle with this today? Take a look at big Rx. They push pills on us that in many cases, can lead to bigger problems than we started with. Government removing HaShem from school's and pushing to have Him remove from any public forum. Trying to force church's to pro-forum same sex marriages, and the list can get rather long.
This also gives a hint hat HaShem was not looking at the mortality of ma kind, rather the intent of his heart. Seeing the need to help man kind understand this, HaShem also found fit to give a hand full of commandments to man kind after the flood. As we are not there yet, it seems right to hold off on that.
Gen 6:8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.
Was this grace found in Noah's works, or was it found in his faith?
Once more their 2 sides to that. One makes the claim that salvation by works was the only way to find it. The other, makes the claim that faith was never by works, rather has always been by faith. As the Story unfolds, we find that Noah never asked, "Are you sure about this ark thing? I mean it has never rained in all my days, so how can I be sure of this?" No Noah just goes on and starts work on the ark, not asking why, or if it was really a good idea at all. The Word never tells us it was by faith, rather it show Noah's faith by his action. Does the Word show us Noah's salvation by his works? I think not, after all, what did Noah do when he first got off the ark? That's right boy's and girl's, he got drunk. As we will come to that in time, I am going to let it go for now.