sorry, brother, I want to agree with you, but this time you're wrong, you didn't go back far enough. I was blind-sided and actually told to shut up out of the clear blue because someone decided they didnt like and misinterpreted something I said in another post that had Nothing to do with her. I had a right to 'speak my mind', (and i had said nothing wrong), she had no right to slam me publicly, I then had a right to defend myself, and I offered a chance to address me in pvt, not because i wanted to talk to HER! but to give her a chance, and keep it out of you folks business. She didnt, and kept it public. That's fine, but then she twisted it to make it seem as if SHE was offering ME to pm HER! Sure, she did Afterward, but why should I?and now she's garnered sympathy from others, as if a truce is in order and can only happen if I somehow apologize for being slammed in the first place. Not this time. I've been forced into the role of apologizing for being a victim in the past, not gonna do it again. I'm sorry to you, e-g, I never had a quarrel with you, and don't intend to have one now, and I understand your desire as role of peacemaker. I want that too. There's a common sense order to that. When are we gonna stop misplacing blame? Or have we gotten so twisted that we now expect ppl to apologize for what someone else says and does to them?! It's kinda like the world expecting Israel, or even America, to apologize to the terrorists. (Oh, that's right, presidentO does that already, doesn't he? ... oops,bad example,
)