The Rapture Theory

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
O

onwingsaseagles

Guest
#81
#II -The book of revelation reveals that the church is in heaven while the tribulation happens on earth.

Revelation 7:9-10 [FONT=&quot]After[/FONT] this I saw a vast crowd, too great to count, from every nation and tribe and people and language, standing in front of the throne and before the Lamb. They were clothed in white robes and held palm branches in their hands. 10 And they were shouting with a mighty shout, “Salvation comes from our God who sits on the throne and from the Lamb!”
Here we see that after the angel had shouted “Wait! Don’t harm the land or the sea or the trees until we have placed the seal of God on the foreheads of his servants,” holding the opening of the 7th seal to place God’s seal on the forehead of God’s people, the 144,000 Jews, on the earth, John saw a great multitude of people before the throne. Who is this crowd? Given that they are before the throne in heaven before the opening of the seventh seal, the diversity and the magnitude of the crowd, we know that this crowd is the Church. So while the tribulation is going on the earth, the church is already in heaven rejoicing with the Lord Jesus Christ. The fact, they were dressed in white robes means that they have been washed by the blood of the lamb. It is impossible for the church to be part of that elect that Matthew 24 speaks of.
These people have been martyred not raptured.

The Church is absolutely absent from the tribulation period. Is this a coincidence? Far from it, it is simply because it is not there.

Those who hold the post tribulation view insist that those “saints” that are found in several places during the tribulation period has to be the church. However, given the fact that the bible shows that the church is already in heaven and the fact that the tribulation period was not set for the church but for Israel, the fact that before the opening of the 7th seal 144,000 were sealed with God’s seal on earth (they were not present within the crowd as the crowd was in heaven and the 144,000 was on earth), those saints cannot be the church. They are 1) the 144,000, 2) Israelites/Jews, and 3) those who have accepted Christ during the seven years tribulation.
I have already disproven this lie, further more, how could a multitude the number of to high to be counted be martyred if the entire church was raptured before the tribulation.

Your statements are no more than pretrib propaganda taught to you by liars.
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
#82
I have to pause and response to these accusations.
There's a few simple reasons why the pre-trib view is wrong, without needing to go into what scripture says :

1) it was not common in the church prior to the 1800's, the overwhelming majority of great bible people in the past have been post-tribbers.
2) there is little record of it in early church writings, except for the writings of Ephraem the Syrian in about 370 AD. Not sure if there are any others.
Most post-tribulationists have stopped using this argument because it has been found to be false.The accurate year of fall between 3 to 7 AD, Not 370 AD. In his sermon titled"On the Last Times, The Antichrist, and the End of the World, or Sermon on the End of the World," we find a very similar concept of the rapture of the church that is consistent with the pre-tribulational view. Regarding the rapture of the church, he says this:

We ought to understand thoroughly therefore, my brothers, what is imminent or overhanging... Why therefore do we not reject every care of earthly actions and prepare ourseles for the meeting of the Lord Jesus Christ, so that he may draw us from the confusion, which overwhelms all the world?... For all the saints and elect of God are gathered together before the tribulation, which is to come, and are taken to the Lord, in order that they may not see at any time the confusion which overwhelms the world because of our sins.

That's not all... later on around 1260 AD, in the treatise called "The history of Brother Dolcino," we find this paragraph about Brother Dolcino's belief.

Again, [Dolcino believed and preached and taught] that within those three years Ddolcino himself and his followers will preach the coming of the Antichrist. And that the Antichrist was coming into this world within the bounds of the said three and a half years; and after he had come, then he[dolcino] and his followers would be transferred dinto paradise, in which are Enock and Elijah, And in this way they will be preserved unharmed from the persecution of Antichrist. And that then Enoch and Elijah themselves would descend on the earth for the purpose of preaching [against] Antichrist. Then they would be killed by him or by his servants, and thus Antichrist would reighn for a long time. But when the Antichrist is dead, Dolcino himself, who then would be the holy pope, and his preserved followers will descend on the earth, and will preach the right faith of CHrist to all, and will convert those who will be living then to the true faith of Jesus Christ..

These two quotes are not the only ones, there are ample evidences that show that the rapture of the church before the tribulation is not a recent "invention" like some post-tribulationist would like to believe in an effort to discredit the post tribulational view.
3) a plain and simple reading of the bible does not lead to a pre-trib conclusion. Pre-tribbers need to read in between the lines a lot and "cut and paste" a lot of scriptures together to come up with a logical story.
The Post-tribulational view require picking and chossing scriptures while denying others and dismissing some fundamental teachings of Jesus Christ. Not only that, this view leave many unanswered questions (I will raise those questions as we continue to discuss this topic).
due to lack of biblical support, the pre-trib movement needs to rely upon fictional books and movies (eg left behind series) in order to indoctrinate or brainwash its followers into believing it.

On the contrary, the Pre-tribulational view is the most scriptural, logical, and consistent view of all. It puts God's promises and Jesus' fundamental teachings into perspectives.


 
O

onwingsaseagles

Guest
#83
You last post Rosinsky, was a complete and total absurdity, full of fallacy.
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
#84
First of all, I have never claimed that the elect was the church because it is irrelevant to my point, because in point 2 I have given biblical proof that the resurrection of the just as well as the rapture is at the 2nd coming of the Lord which you have just agreed is post trib. Further more the fact of the matter is that the elect is the church, The pretrib false teachers must claim as you have to continue to support their false doctrine, which is ridiculous for a born again christian to do. Change the obvious meaning of words just so they do not have to form their doctrine around what the Bible actual teaches.
I don't not mind disagreement. However, I do mind statements without backing them up. I post a very long detailed explanation of what the bible says. I would expect that you at least try to put up an argument against it if you indeed disagree.

This is what I need you to do, take me out of the picture and respond to the points that I have made. Provide your arguments, either logical or biblical, for your conclusion. Only within these grounds can we have a healthy debate. If you continue to act this will, I will simply withdraw from this discussion. Not because your view is accurate, but simply because it is impossible to have a healthy discussion with you.
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
#85
These people have been martyred not raptured.
That's fine... now you've made a statement. Now provide arguments that prove this statement.

I have already disproven this lie, further more, how could a multitude the number of to high to be counted be martyred if the entire church was raptured before the tribulation.

Your statements are no more than pretrib propaganda taught to you by liars.

To disprove something is to provide logical arguments that support your statement (conclusion). You have yet to do so. So you have not disproved anything. You cannot submit an article that shows a conclusion without showing how you arrive to that conclusion.

Given the time it took you to respond to the threat shows that you did not made any effort to read into it, research, and respond accurately.
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
#86
You last post Rosinsky, was a complete and total absurdity, full of fallacy.
Again, that's a statement. Prove your statement by providing reasons, logic, and most importantly bible truths.
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
#87
10 CLUES TO UNLOCK THE BOOK OF REVELATION.
Slepsog4,

I can't quite pinpoint what you are trying to say. Rather than assuming what you mean, could you please tell me?
 
O

onwingsaseagles

Guest
#88
Slepsog4,

I can't quite pinpoint what you are trying to say. Rather than assuming what you mean, could you please tell me?
He is a preterist
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
#89
I acknowledged that much, but rather than assuming his view, I want him/her to expand what he means so we can open discussion and have a more in dept dialogue.
 
O

onwingsaseagles

Guest
#90
That's fine... now you've made a statement. Now provide arguments that prove this statement.
Revelation 7: 9-14
9 After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands;
10 And cried with a loud voice, saying, Salvation to our God which sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb.
11 And all the angels stood round about the throne, and about the elders and the four beasts, and fell before the throne on their faces, and worshipped God,
12 Saying, Amen: Blessing, and glory, and wisdom, and thanksgiving, and honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever. Amen.
13 And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they?
14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.


So here are the questions
#1 Who are these people?
#2 How, where, when, and why did they receive their white robes?
#3 How did they come out of the great Tribulation? (rapture or martyrdom)


Here is the answer to all those questions.
Revelation 6:9-11
9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:
10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.


Answers
#1 Who are these people? Martyrs
#2How, when, where, and why did they receive white robes? How? through martyrdom, Where? In heaven, When ? When they got to heaven, Why? Because they gave their lives for Christ.
#3 How did they come out of great tribulation? By being beheaded for the word of God, and the testimony they held
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#91
These two quotes are not the only ones, there are ample evidences that show that the rapture of the church before the tribulation is not a recent "invention" like some post-tribulationist would like to believe in an effort to discredit the post tribulational view.
Where is this "ample evidence" ? Can you quote early church fathers like Ireneus , Justin Martyr, etc that show they believed in the pre-trib rapture?
Because according to quotes (posted below), they believed in post-trib:






Most post-tribulationists have stopped using this argument because it has been found to be false.The accurate year of fall between 3 to 7 AD, Not 370 AD. In his sermon titled"On the Last Times, The Antichrist, and the End of the World, or Sermon on the End of the World," we find a very similar concept of the rapture of the church that is consistent with the pre-tribulational view. Regarding the rapture of the church, he says this:
What is this "year of fall" ? 3 to 7 AD ?

It is consistent only in hindsight (i.e. pre-tribbers looking back in the past to find something that resembles their belief). Because here it explains how the writings of Ephraem are taken out of context by pre-tribbers, and I have to agree.. it isn't a very solid argument for a whisking away of the Church



Pseudo-Ephraem (perhaps 400 or 600 A.D.) was a man who "borrowed" materials from the real Ephraem of Syria, ---and some pre-tribulationists have taken several sentences out of context, in an attempt to say that there was an early date for the pre-tribulation rapture teaching. The main two sentences of Pseudo-Ephraem which are quoted, state : "Why therefore do we not reject every care of earthly actions and prepare oursleves for the meeting of the Lord Christ, so that He may draw us from the confusion which overwhelms all the world? ... For all the saints and elect of God are gathered, prior to the tribulation that is to come, and are taken to the Lord lest they ever see the confusion that is to overwhelm the world because of our sins." ---Note, that these quoted sentences do not mention a coming of the Lord, or a resurrection of the dead or a glorification (translation) or a heavenly destination of believers. However, in a very solid and thorough analysis of the writings of both pseudo and real Ephraem, Dr. Robert Gundry (in his book, "First the Antichrist", '97, Baker, p.161-188) concludes that in reality, "Pseudo-Ephraem urges Christians to forsake worldliness in preparation for meeting Christ when he returns after the great tribulation. Meanwhile, Christian evangelism is taking people to the Lord and gathering them into the Church. ... This interpretation takes account of Pseudo-Ephraem's leaving the corpses of Christians unburied during the tribulation, putting the resurrection of Christians and their meeting Christ at his coming after the tribulation to destroy the Antichrist, making imminent the advent of Antichrist rather than that of Christ, and utilizing the plainly and heavily post-trib tradition of true Ephraem, who repeatedly portrayed present-day evangelism as a gathering" (my emphases).
And here are some quotes from some more familiar early church writings:


Justin Martyr (100 to 167 A.D.) lived near the time of the apostle John (died 100 A.D.); Justin taught the resurrection and rapture of believers would occur at the beginning of the millennium (Christ's 1000-year reign, which starts just after the Second Coming). Justin also wrote, "the man of apostasy [Antichrist] ...shall venture to do unlawful deeds on earth against us the Christians" (Trypho cx).
Irenaeus (130 to 200 A.D.) who said he held the actual apostles' teaching, wrote, "they [the ten kings of Rev. 17:1-13] shall ...give their kingdom to the beast [Antichrist], and put the Church to flight" (Against Heresies V, 26, 1). Irenaeus also said : "but he [John] indicates the number of the name [666 of Antichrist] now, that when this man comes we may avoid him, being aware who he is" ( Against Heresies V, 30, 4).
Tertullian (150 to 220 A.D.) attached the rapture of 1 Thessalonians 4, to the start of Christ's millennial kingdom on earth. Tertullian said the tribulation situation will be such "that the beast Antichrist with his false prophet may wage war on the Church of God" (On the Resurrection of the Flesh xxv). Cyprian (200 to 260 A.D.) writes, "Nor let any of you, beloved brethren, be terrified by the fear of future persecution, by the coming of the threatening Antichrist" (Epistle 55,7). And we do well to take Cyprian's advice, since the Lord's grace is sufficient for true believers to be victorious in any situation.
And how do you explain that the majority of great bible people were post-tribbers ? I posted the list above. This must show that a pre-trib view is not as obvious in scripture as you pretend it to be.
 
O

onwingsaseagles

Guest
#92
There is no question that Rosinsky has not only been indoctrinated into the pretrib belief, but who ever taught him this false doctrine has done a very good job of manipulating his mind. Personally I think it is sad that people would do such things to other people. Ezekiel speaks of it in Ezekiel 13
Ezekiel 13:1-9
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

2 Son of man, prophesy against the prophets of Israel that prophesy, and say thou unto them that prophesy out of their own hearts, Hear ye the word of he LORD;

3 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Woe unto the foolish prophets, that follow their own spirit, and have seen nothing!
4 O Israel, thy prophets are like the foxes in the deserts.
5 Ye have not gone up into the gaps, neither made up the hedge for the house of Israel to stand in the battle in the day of the LORD.
6 They have seen vanity and lying divination, saying, The LORD saith: and the LORD hath not sent them: and they have made others to hope that they would confirm the word.
7 Have ye not seen a vain vision, and have ye not spoken a lying divination, whereas ye say, The LORD saith it; albeit I have not spoken?
8 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Because ye have spoken vanity, and seen lies, therefore, behold, I am against you, saith the Lord GOD.
9 And mine hand shall be upon the prophets that see vanity, and that divine lies: they shall not be in the assembly of my people, neither shall they be written in the writing of the house of Israel, neither shall they enter into the land of Israel; and ye shall know that I am the Lord GOD

The teachers of this false hope will pay a heavier price than the believers, although both will pay a price, and the sad thing is sometimes the student becomes the teacher unaware of the damge they are doing. I believe this is the case in reference to our deceived freind Rosinsky.
 

sweetnshy

Senior Member
Sep 10, 2003
219
4
18
#93
Okay, question for the post-tribbers (and again, I'm not trying to challenge you or argue...I'm just trying to better understand this view). Revelation 3:10 makes it sound as though we'll be protected through the tribulation, yet other verses in Revelation indicate that anyone who does not take the mark of the beast will be killed. I don't really understand how both of those statements could be true. How can we be kept safe from harm and yet still be killed? And for that matter.........if most Christians are martyred during the tribulation, wouldn't that mean that there wouldn't be anyone (or hardly anyone) left to be raptured at the second coming?
 
O

onwingsaseagles

Guest
#94
Okay, question for the post-tribbers (and again, I'm not trying to challenge you or argue...I'm just trying to better understand this view). Revelation 3:10 makes it sound as though we'll be protected through the tribulation, yet other verses in Revelation indicate that anyone who does not take the mark of the beast will be killed. I don't really understand how both of those statements could be true. How can we be kept safe from harm and yet still be killed? And for that matter.........if most Christians are martyred during the tribulation, wouldn't that mean that there wouldn't be anyone (or hardly anyone) left to be raptured at the second coming?
First of all I answer this once before remember I told you to read Revelation 12, I will tomorrow start a thread on that to explain it furth. However you are right by the end of the tribulation there will be very few Christians left to rapture you see the rapture is not the big awesome event that it is made out to be by the pretribbers. If you read 1st Thess 4:13-18 close (which I will post for you) The rapture is a very small point. The real point Paul is making is that the dead will be raised. Our dead loveones that have gone on before us are with God now and will be returning with Him to be resurrected. That is what the blessed hope is the resurrection of the dead in Christ not the catching away of the living, that is just a side issue. Pretribber have distorted it, to be something it is not.

1st Thess 4:13-18
13 But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope.
14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
15 For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.
16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
18 Wherefore comfort one another with these words.


You see if you read verse 13 and 14 you will want Paul is telling us to comfort ourselves with in verse 18, and in verse 15 Paul tells us when this will occur ''AT the Coming Of the Lord'' (which is at the end of the Tribulation not before it) then verses 16 and 17 tell us exactly what is going to happen and in what order. This whole passage is really about the resurrection of the just not the rapture, that catching away of those that are alive and remain or have survived, is a side note at best.
 

sweetnshy

Senior Member
Sep 10, 2003
219
4
18
#95
Okay, that makes sense to me. But you did acknowledge the other day that you believe Revelation 3:10 means we'll be kept safe during the tribulation. So how are we kept safe and still killed? Are we protected for just part of the tribulation?
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#96
I certainly don't think God's people on the earth will be protected from harm, a lot will be martyred.

Rev 13:7 It was allowed to fight against God's people and to defeat them, and it was given authority over every tribe, nation, language, and race.
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
#97
#2 1st Thess 4:15-17 and 1st cor 15:20-23 say that the resurrection of the just/rapture is at the 2nd coming.
1st Thessalonians 4:15-17
15 For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep.
16 For the Lord himself shall descend with a shout, with the voice of an arch angel, and with the trump of God: and the dead will rise first:
17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall ever be with the Lord.

1st Corinthians 15:20-23
20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept.
21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
22 For as in Adam all die, in Christ shall all be made alive.
23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they they are Christ at his coming.
Those scriptures do not, and I repeat, do not say that the resurrection of the just (according to you) is at the second coming. I have already outlined to you the differences between 1 Thessalonians 4 and Matthew 24 that makes it impossible for that to be true. You've retained that these two events (the rapture and the second coming) will happen immediately after each other. Given the huge amount of discrepancies between the two, this again is impossible.

Here is a list of some of the discrepancies:

Rapture
Second Coming

The rapture happens in the twinkling of an eye; so sudden that it's too fast for the eye 1 Cor 15:52
The second coming comes slowly and people will see Him come back. Zechariah 12:10 Matt 24:30, Rev 1:7
------------------------------------
Jesus remained in the air 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18
Jesus' feet touches the earth Zechariah 14:4, Revelation 19:11-21
------------------------------------
Christians goes up first and unbelievers are left behind. 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18
Wicked are taken first, the righteous (Tribulation saints) are left behind. Matthew 13:28-30
------------------------------------
The rapture's purpose is to present the Church to Himself and to the Father 2 Corinthians 11:2, Revelation. 19:6-9
The purpose of the second coming is to execute judgment on the wicked and establish His Kingdom Jude 14-15,Revelation 19:11-21, Zechariah 14:3-4
------------------------------------
Jesus will come FOR His Church. John 14:1-3, 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17
Jesus coming WITH His Church Col 3:4, Zechariah 14:5, Jude 14, Revelation 19:14
------------------------------------
Only Christians will see Him 1 John 3:2, 1 Cor 15:52
Every eye will see Him Revelation 1:7
------------------------------------
Jesus comes with a shout(for resurrection) 1 Thessalonians 4:16
No shout mentioned Rev. 19:11-21
------------------------------------
A resurrection takes place 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18, 1 Cor 15:51-54
No resurrection mentioned Revelation 1:7, 19:11-21, Zechariah 12:10, 14:4-5
------------------------------------
Can happen at any time given Revelation 3:3, 1 Thessalonians 5:4-6
Happens at end of 7 years of Tribulation Dan 9:24-27Matt 24:29-30, 2 Thessalonians 2:3-8
------------------------------------
No angels are sent to gather (resurrected people don't need angels to help them) 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17
Angels sent forth to gather people together for judgment Matthew 13:39, 41, 49, 24:31, 25:31, 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10
------------------------------------
Spirits of those dead in Christ return with Jesus to receive their their resurrected bodies (1 Thessalonians 4:14-16)
Christians return with Jesus in already resurrected bodies riding on white horses. Revelation 19:11-21
------------------------------------
Jesus does not return on a white horse (1 Thessalonians 4:14-16)
Jesus returns on a white horse Revelation 19:11
------------------------------------
The dead in Christ only (those in Christ) 1 Thess
alonians 4:14-17
For obedient Israel & Gentiles Romans 11:25-27, Matthew 25:31-46

After carefully examining these discrepancies, you will see that there has to be two events at two very distinct time. Anything other than that would be total contradiction.
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
#98
#3 1st Cor 15:51-53 says that the rapture is at the last trump but matt 24:29-31 says that there is a trump sounded after the tribulation, the rapture can not be b4 this trump therefore can not be until after the trib is over.
1st Corinthians 15:51-53
51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; we shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,
52 In a moment, in a twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality
.
This is one of the most ridiculous argument against the the rapture. Like I have said before, throughout the bible, we have seen trumpets used for various purposes. Mainly for the beginning and the end of something.

Furthermore, we need to look into the Jewish culture. Please do some research on the Jewish feast called "the feast of trumpets" and the words "tekiah gedolah" which means "the last trump." This feast is a Jewish practice where the partakers of blow a series of short trumpet blast lasting about 3 seconds in lengths (some argue that they had different lengths but that's not relevant at this time), except for the last one. The last trumpet blow, which is the longest one of all, is called "the last trump." Judaism connected this "last trump" with the ressurection of the dead, and so does Paul.

There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that connects 1st Corinthians 15 to Matthew 24. The only relationship that they do have is that they are trumpets and they made sounds.
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
#99


Where is this "ample evidence" ? Can you quote early church fathers like Ireneus , Justin Martyr, etc that show they believed in the pre-trib rapture?
Because according to quotes (posted below), they believed in post-trib:

What is this "year of fall" ? 3 to 7 AD ?

It is consistent only in hindsight (i.e. pre-tribbers looking back in the past to find something that resembles their belief). Because here it explains how the writings of Ephraem are taken out of context by pre-tribbers, and I have to agree.. it isn't a very solid argument for a whisking away of the Church

And here are some quotes from some more familiar early church writings:

And how do you explain that the majority of great bible people were post-tribbers ? I posted the list above. This must show that a pre-trib view is not as obvious in scripture as you pretend it to be.
I will hold on to responding to you on this. This is because I want to finish responding to Onw's points. I have already fallen behind and I need to catch up.
 
R

Rosinsky

Guest
So here are the questions
#1 Who are these people?
#2 How, where, when, and why did they receive their white robes?
#3 How did they come out of the great Tribulation? (rapture or martyrdom)


Here is the answer to all those questions.


Answers
#1 Who are these people? Martyrs
#2How, when, where, and why did they receive white robes? How? through martyrdom, Where? In heaven, When ? When they got to heaven, Why? Because they gave their lives for Christ.
#3 How did they come out of great tribulation? By being beheaded for the word of God, and the testimony they held
I think you might be right on this multitude not being the church. After a close study of the clues in within the chapter again, the details do not seem to be consistent with the church. I am seeing that you might be right. I will do some research at the library tomorrow and get back to you on this.

Whether the multitude is or isn't the church, my main argument in that post stands! I would like you to respond to that long post when you have a chance.