Wow...there are Catholics who are bad and wrong? How could that be possible?
Maybe because...there are wrong and bad people everywhere.
Maybe because...there are wrong and bad people everywhere.
Jackson are you using blue and red again to defame Mary?
she is favored by God. He listens to her prayers.
That is significant
is that why you need to BOLD everything?DO YOU HAVE PROBLEMS READING JACKSON?
Wow...there are Catholics who are bad and wrong? How could that be possible?
Maybe because...there are wrong and bad people everywhere.
Bad people are every where. But Pope is infallible in teaching of faith
is that why you need to BOLD everything?
If you CAN read than read this which makes it all clear , even to you.
970 "Mary's function as mother of men in no way obscures or diminishes this unique mediation of Christ, but rather shows its power. But the Blessed Virgin's salutary influence on men . . . flows forth from the superabundance of the merits of Christ, rests on his mediation, depends entirely on it, and draws all its power from it.
Are you happy now.
Can we type normally from now on?
I have to go...
You continue to repeat words THAT ARE SIMPLY NOT THERE IN THE ORIGINAL TEXT. ie worship. The word "venerate" is in the original text as distinct from "adoration" - or worship due to God.
And the pope acts infallibly only when speaking ex cathedra.
Popes have done some bad things! They are ordinary people. Luther and Wycliff were right about the excesses of medieaval popes for example. But their solution was wrong. They threw the baby out with the bathwater.
Infallible in faith doesn't mean sinless. Just stop, friend
No, dude
i can make things up too! Australia! Elephants! Cookies! India! Tabletop!
Yes...infallibility of the Pope is only in special circumstances. Not everything he says is right.What do you mean my brother, do you mean Pope may teach wrong doctrine of faith?
So you're not in favor of the church fathers?Well you are in a lot of company, but that does not make it good!Elin said:So it looks like I am in pretty good company.
The conversation between peter and Jesus was Aramaic as the working language of common people , in which no such distinction of Petra and petros exists,
Yes...infallibility of the Pope is only in special circumstances. Not everything he says is right.
You know, I just don't know what they could tell me that the word of God doesn't.Start at the beginning why not? The earliest writings are mainly letters but they give a fascinating insight into the church. Those of the generation of Polycarp, such as Ignatius were actually taught by the apostles, indeed refer to such as Paul.
See here for example EPISTLES
Take just one letter ignatius to the smyrneans (polycarps diocese) (two paragraphs below)
Which confirms belief that the eucharist is the flesh...and it is heresy to think otherwise.
That to be valid it must be performed by a bishop.
I enclose a couple of paragraphs below -
RCC did not invent this stuff. The early church was liturgical (eg didache) sacramental, bishops and so on, as demonstrated by what the fathers say, and they were taught by the apostles..
So irenaus, ignatius, polycarp , justin martyr are some of the first. Later fathers, the sermons too are fascinating, explaining links between OT and NT in ways few consider.
CHAPTER VII.--LET US STAND ALOOF FROM SUCH HERETICS.
They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins, and which the Father, of His goodness, raised up again. Those, therefore, who speak against this gift of God, incur death in the midst of their disputes. But it were better for them to treat it with respect, that they also might rise again. It is fitting, therefore, that ye should keep aloof from such persons, and not to speak of them either in private or in public, but to give heed to the prophets, and above all, to the Gospel, in which the passion [of Christ] has been revealed to us, and the resurrection has been fully proved. But avoid all divisions, as the beginning of evils.
CHAPTER VIII.--LET NOTHING BE DONE WITHOUT THE BISHOP.
See that ye all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as ye would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.
I have to go for a few days. God bless all.
You know, I just don't know what they could tell me that the word of God doesn't.
I think I'm just going to stay with the source itself rather than writings about the source.
But thanks anyway.
He isn't the Bible interpreter...he's the Prince of the Apostles. The Church is the interpreter, not the Pope.Good, it mean you better read and asking Holy spirit to interpreted the bible, since you confess that Pope teaching about faith may wrong, and it mean you believe not only Pope authorized to interpreted the bible.
If he sole bible interpreted choose by God he must be reliable and can't be wrong.