Can't be. (If one is a preterist that is.)
So do you think that there is a temple to be built soon that is 1.75 x 1.75 miles in size? You do realize this is bigger than the temple mount, right?
Can't be. (If one is a preterist that is.)
Now unless something very miraculous happened overnight and has yet to be reported, the Dead Sea is STILL DEAD. It has not been healed yet. At the return of Christ, the waters flowing from the Temple in Jerusalem will heal the Dead Sea.
Another interesting feature of Ezekiel's temple is that it was described as being about 1.75 miles by 1.75 miles in size (42:15-20) - which was about the size of the entire ancient city.
I don't know that this was meant to be an actual building. I think Ezekiel may be saying something else.
Can't be. (If one is a preterist that is.)
Having misplaced my measuring rod, probably stolen by a mover, years ago, there are a number of Bible translations that zero in on a somewhat lower number of 875 feet, but "who knows" legitimate disagreements out there. In any case, this temple and surroundings is much too large for the existing Temple Mount, if much of Ezekiel's temple were even of Judaism past.
The size of a Babylonian reed is well known. In Eze 42:15-20 he is explicitly using a reed.
I did my previous conversion wrong too. It's 1 mile by 1 mile. Still much bigger than the temple mount.
500 reeds = 1600m = 1 miles
Do I have to post this again?
Zechariah
14:8 And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be.
14:9 And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one.
14:10 All the land shall be turned as a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem: and it shall be lifted up, and inhabited in her place, from Benjamin's gate unto the place of the first gate, unto the corner gate, and from the tower of Hananeel unto the king's winepresses.
Can the Lord rearrange spacing requirements for His millennial temple?
People who dink around with Bible prophecy and attempt to spew out their cause with claimed spurious knowledge bark at the wind
..... and walk right past a prophet's truth
So do you think that there is a temple to be built soon that is 1.75 x 1.75 miles in size? You do realize this is bigger than the temple mount, right?
Ezekiel also describes Jerusalem as having gates, but Zechariah says the city doesn't have walls because it won't need them:
Zech2:1 I looked again, and there was a man with a measuring line in his hand. 2:2 I asked, “Where are you going?” He replied, “To measure Jerusalem[SUP] [/SUP]in order to determine its width and its length.” 2:3 At this point the angelic messenger who spoke to me went out, and another messenger came to meet him 2:4 and said to him, “Hurry, speak to this young man as follows: ‘Jerusalem will no longer be enclosed by walls because of the multitude of people and animals there. 2:5 But I (the Lord says) will be a wall of fire surrounding Jerusalem and the source of glory in her midst.’”
Ezekiel also describes Jerusalem as having gates, but Zechariah says the city doesn't have walls because it won't need them:
Zech2:1 I looked again, and there was a man with a measuring line in his hand. 2:2 I asked, “Where are you going?” He replied, “To measure Jerusalemin order to determine its width and its length.” 2:3 At this point the angelic messenger who spoke to me went out, and another messenger came to meet him 2:4 and said to him, “Hurry, speak to this young man as follows: ‘Jerusalem will no longer be enclosed by walls because of the multitude of people and animals there. 2:5 But I (the Lord says) will be a wall of fire surrounding Jerusalem and the source of glory in her midst.’”
JimmyD beat me to the measurements...LOL
Ezekiel describes Jerusalem? Old Jerusalem had walls, but not much now (walls are obsolete for war protection, only work for some pesky neighbors anymore), and not in the millennium. Jerusalem is neither just the temple, but a city, the walls of the Ezekiel temple nothing to do with the logistics of the city sprawl of Jerusalem.
Once some Bible translators are done with you guys, templemount.org is going to come after what's left of you, to whit also coming in at 875 feet square. And these guys are the real deal of the Old Testament, hanging out in Tel Aviv.
I don't understand what you're saying. I think you're saying that Ezekiel describes the city but doesn't include the outskirts while Zechariah is talking about the city plus the outskirts. Do I understand you correctly?
Is this the equivalent of saying when you're buddies get here they are really going to beat me up?
So, if you wanted to argue my actual point I think you would have to argue that Ezekiel wasn't using a Babylonian reed in the verses I posted. I don't know how one would argue against that though, since he clearly says it's a reed and Ezekiel is living in Babylon. It would be like saying a guy living in America talking about a measuring stick and measuring out a "yard" didn't really mean "yard" as Americans normally mean it. And no, 500 Babylonian reeds does not equal 875 feet. 500 cubits would be close to 875 feet, but not reeds.
Don't make the mistake of assuming that the topography of the Temple Mount area will be the same then as it is now.
Don't make the mistake of assuming that the topography of the Temple Mount area will be the same then as it is now.