There's nothing wrong with my phrasing. You have made false assertions and as I have the time and see them, I correct your false assertions with explanation.
Of course, that's another false assertion in and of itself (e.g. falsely asserting that I don't take the time to offer explanation when in post after post I certainly have).
And I'm repeating myself in that I
never accused you of lying or deliberately misinforming. That's all in your head. I may state that your position is disingenuous or that you're being disingenuous with respect to a particular assertion but I have always believed that you're stating it in good faith.
But in the false metaphysical worldview of atheism, it's not ultimately important whether you are or not because you're nothing more than a random accident of complex bacteria the material universe will soon purge itself of as it expands to the point no biological life can ever exist in it again.
Fortunately, the reality is very different. Well, for those of us whom have received God's down payment in our person and now look forward to citizenship in with God (cf. Eph. 1:3; 2:6; Col. 3:1–4) immortal and imperishable (see 1 Cor. 15:35–54) upon the death of our lowly mortal body.
Now this man I know personally:
[video=youtube_share;h2X5uAB692A]http://youtu.be/h2X5uAB692A[/video]
The problem is in your phrasing. I do not make false assertions, but I do make assertions you think to be false. I would have less cause to complain if you simply stated that you disagreed with me and explained why. I am just concerned that if you state I am making false assertions you leave open the possibility that I am deliberately misinforming. I do not do this.
Perhaps I am too sensitive in thinking my character is being besmirched when that is not really what you meant to imply.