THE GREAT COVID-19 VACCINE CRIMINAL COVER-UP

[Rhomphaeam]

You seem to be another one who has drunk the Kool Aid of the COVID conspirators. Kindly read this and other research papers and get rid of all your false information.

DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN COVID19 VACCINES BY MICRO -RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY
TECHNICAL REPORT Almeria, Spain, November 2, 2021

SUMMARY
We present here our research on the presence of graphene in covid vaccines. We have carried out a random screening of graphene -like nanoparticles visible at the optical microscopy in seven random samples of vials from four different trademarks, coupling images with their spectral signatures of RAMAN vibration. By this technique, called micro -RAMAN, we have been able to determine the presence of graphene in these samples, after screening more than 110 objects selected for their graphene - like appearance under optical microscopy. Out of them, a group of 28 objects have been selected, due to the compatibility of both images and spectra with the presence of graphene derivatives, based on the correspondence of these signals with those obtained from standards an d scientific literature. The identification of graphene oxide structures can be regarded as conclusive in 8 of them, due to the high spectral correlation with the standard. In the remaining 20 objects, images coupled with Raman signals show a very high level of compatibility with undetermined graphene structures, however different than the standard used here. This research remains open and is made available to scientific community for discussion. We make a call for independent researchers, with no conflict of interest or coaction from any institution to make wider counter -analysis of these products to achieve a more detailed knowledge of the composition and potential health risk of these experimental drugs, reminding that graphene materials have a potential toxicity on human beings and its presence has not been declared in any emergency use authorization.

There has NEVER been full disclosure of the lethal and toxic nature of these bogus COVID "vaccines" according to the Nuremberg Code. Had there been FULL DISCLOSURE, absolutely no one would have agreed to be vaccinated. The vaccinator would have had to say "Please understand that this injection could either kill you or create extremely serious adverse effects within your body".

As to Aidan, he has clearly been a propagandist for the genocidal killers by constantly opposing the truth. Read all his post in this connection. Christians must love the truth.

The original is in Spanish - so where did you get your alleged translation from?

https://diario16.com/wp-content/upl..._CORMINATY_DR_CAMPRA_FIRMA_E_1_HORIZONTAL.pdf

 

[cv5]

You seem to be another one who has drunk the Kool Aid of the COVID conspirators. Kindly read this and other research papers and get rid of all your false information.

DETECTION OF GRAPHENE IN COVID19 VACCINES BY MICRO -RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY
TECHNICAL REPORT Almeria, Spain, November 2, 2021

SUMMARY
We present here our research on the presence of graphene in covid vaccines. We have carried out a random screening of graphene -like nanoparticles visible at the optical microscopy in seven random samples of vials from four different trademarks, coupling images with their spectral signatures of RAMAN vibration. By this technique, called micro -RAMAN, we have been able to determine the presence of graphene in these samples, after screening more than 110 objects selected for their graphene - like appearance under optical microscopy. Out of them, a group of 28 objects have been selected, due to the compatibility of both images and spectra with the presence of graphene derivatives, based on the correspondence of these signals with those obtained from standards an d scientific literature. The identification of graphene oxide structures can be regarded as conclusive in 8 of them, due to the high spectral correlation with the standard. In the remaining 20 objects, images coupled with Raman signals show a very high level of compatibility with undetermined graphene structures, however different than the standard used here. This research remains open and is made available to scientific community for discussion. We make a call for independent researchers, with no conflict of interest or coaction from any institution to make wider counter -analysis of these products to achieve a more detailed knowledge of the composition and potential health risk of these experimental drugs, reminding that graphene materials have a potential toxicity on human beings and its presence has not been declared in any emergency use authorization.

There has NEVER been full disclosure of the lethal and toxic nature of these bogus COVID "vaccines" according to the Nuremberg Code. Had there been FULL DISCLOSURE, absolutely no one would have agreed to be vaccinated. The vaccinator would have had to say "Please understand that this injection could either kill you or create extremely serious adverse effects within your body".

As to Aidan, he has clearly been a propagandist for the genocidal killers by constantly opposing the truth. Read all his post in this connection. Christians must love the truth.

I had to put the "nein, but ze jab is ze zolushon" guy back on ignore.

 

[Nehemiah6]

The original is in Spanish - so where did you get your alleged translation from?

Is this another Leftist diversionary tactic? So why don't you personally search out ALL the research that has been done, and many of the videos which were "cancelled" because they were bringing out the truth? Or do you fear the truth?

 

[ZNP]

Is this another Leftist diversionary tactic? So why don't you personally search out ALL the research that has been done, and many of the videos which were "cancelled" because they were bringing out the truth? Or do you fear the truth?

Yes, that study has been coded into the indecipherable code of Spanish. If only there were some way to translate it into English.

 

[Rhomphaeam]

Is this another Leftist diversionary tactic? So why don't you personally search out ALL the research that has been done, and many of the videos which were "cancelled" because they were bringing out the truth? Or do you fear the truth?

I have no political leaning whatsoever. Why do you make political allusions when speaking with a born again brother in Christ?

I could do the research easily - but you made the post that included an alleged summary quotation in English from a Spanish research paper. Not me. Can't you source your own posts when you quote others?

I could even get it translated myself. I have done that with other matters that I needed source material for and which I could then copyright for protection. I have friends in Spain who are research fellows in Psychology. One of them could translate it no doubt. If not they could certainly have it translated by an appropriate academic. Why don't you disclose your source? You made the claim and then incited hatred of a fellow believer whom you called an agent and protagonist of those whom you assert are genocidal. He is a German national and a clinical nurse - that is perhaps about the severest insult you could have made both professionally, culturally and spiritually.

If I did intend to quote from the paper it will be based on a translation I can trust. Rather as a vial with no proven origination can be relied upon to make scientific claims to its ingredients. Origination - proven and trusted. We are not children buying sweets are we?

All I am doing is asking polite questions of fellow believers. What are you doing?

 

[Aidan1]

You don't understand what Jesus said. In order to bring in the kingdom families being split apart is inevitable. You do not allow the unbeliever to drive the car or determine your walk. I will follow the Lord, if that results in a fire falling on the Earth and a division in a family, well the Lord told us that would be the case.

You treat as equivalent bringing the kingdom/gospel into the families with getting the vaccine or not?
We are not talking about the kingdom or the gospel in this thread. We are talking about a vaccine against Sars-coV-2.
And both have noting to do with each other.

 

[Aidan1]

The Lord has come to cast fire on the Earth. Everyone has the choice to receive the savior or be the black coal that is consumed in this fire.

2Peter 3:7 but the heavens that now are, and the earth, by the same word have been stored up for fire, being reserved against the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.

Telling people of the coming judgement is what it means to be a witness who does not withhold from you the whole counsel of God.

Jude 1:7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them, having in like manner with these given themselves over to fornication and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the punishment of eternal fire.

Sin will be judged. You are not showing people any mercy or love to not tell people this.

Jude 1:20 But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Spirit, 21 keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life. 22 And on some have mercy, who are in doubt; 23 and some save, snatching them out of the fire; and on some have mercy with fear; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.

First you build yourselves up in the faith. How? Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God. If you are not speaking the word of God you are not building anyone up in the faith. With our faith built up we are able to keep ourselves in love and mercy. Telling people not to tell the truth is neither love or mercy.

Then we need to have mercy on some. Who? Those who are in doubt. Strengthen their faith by speaking the word.

"Snatch some from the fire". The world is a condemned building that is on fire. The Pandemic is a fire, the vaccine is gasoline. Warning people is our attempt to snatch them out of this burning building.

Where in the word of God it is said, that the Pandemie is the fire and the vaccine is the gasoline?
Is it Gods word or your word?
So you are judge people who take the vaccination.
I agree fully to you to follow Gods word. But not to follow man made words.

 

[ZNP]

You treat as equivalent bringing the kingdom/gospel into the families with getting the vaccine or not?
We are not talking about the kingdom or the gospel in this thread. We are talking about a vaccine against Sars-coV-2.
And both have noting to do with each other.

I did not say that. What I said is that families being split apart because Christians are following the Lord is inevitable, that is not a valid reason to ignore the Lord's leading.

If a brother or sister is led to not get the vaccine the fact that this may cause a division in their family is not a valid reason to ignore the Lord's leading. That was the context of that post.

I do not tell you whether or not you need to get the vaccine. Not once have I told you what to do. Never once have I said that the vaccine has any influence on your standing with the Lord.

What I have said once, twice, and now this is the third time is that believers are required to listen to the Lord and that includes obeying Him. If the Lord says you are not to take the vaccine then you are to obey even if it means losing your job, your house, or whatever other cost there may be.

The Lord has spoken to me on this issue however, I do not in any way think that means that what He has said to me is some kind of universal speaking to everyone whether they are eight months old or 88 years old. I have had Covid and recovered from it, the Lord's speaking might be different for someone who has asthma, or diabetes, or cancer. I don't know. What I do know and have been very interested in speaking is that there is a whole lot about this vaccine that smells to high heaven.

 

[ZNP]

Where in the word of God it is said, that the Pandemie is the fire and the vaccine is the gasoline?
Is it Gods word or your word?
So you are judge people who take the vaccination.
I agree fully to you to follow Gods word. But not to follow man made words.

The words in bold and blue are from the Bible, the words in black that are not bold are my comments. If in anything I am off in my understanding I have the promise from the Lord that He will adjust me. But the black does represent my present day understanding. Sharing my understanding is not equivalent to "judging others". Why do you keep trying to twist and force every word I speak to be some kind of judgement on you?

 

[Aidan1]

I did not say that. What I said is that families being split apart because Christians are following the Lord is inevitable, that is not a valid reason to ignore the Lord's leading.

If a brother or sister is led to not get the vaccine the fact that this may cause a division in their family is not a valid reason to ignore the Lord's leading. That was the context of that post.

I do not tell you whether or not you need to get the vaccine. Not once have I told you what to do. Never once have I said that the vaccine has any influence on your standing with the Lord.

What I have said once, twice, and now this is the third time is that believers are required to listen to the Lord and that includes obeying Him. If the Lord says you are not to take the vaccine then you are to obey even if it means losing your job, your house, or whatever other cost there may be.

The Lord has spoken to me on this issue however, I do not in any way think that means that what He has said to me is some kind of universal speaking to everyone whether they are eight months old or 88 years old. I have had Covid and recovered from it, the Lord's speaking might be different for someone who has asthma, or diabetes, or cancer. I don't know. What I do know and have been very interested in speaking is that there is a whole lot about this vaccine that smells to high heaven.

Then it seems strange that the Lord told you not to take the vaccine, but not all believers.
So as two brothers postet in 2016 that the Lord told them who will be the next president. To one brother he said it will be Clinton and to the other it will be Trump.

If the Lord is against the vaccine, he would let it know to all believers.
So I cant trust you in this matter.

 

[Rhomphaeam]

You treat as equivalent bringing the kingdom/gospel into the families with getting the vaccine or not?
We are not talking about the kingdom or the gospel in this thread. We are talking about a vaccine against Sars-coV-2.
And both have noting to do with each other.

I did not say that. What I said is that families being split apart because Christians are following the Lord is inevitable, that is not a valid reason to ignore the Lord's leading.

So Teacher, what has the Lord said that makes the vaccine for Sars-coV-2 and the divisions that are being witnessed in families and between believers so pertinent that it is necessary to make a prophetic claim to the Scripture that validates' divisions based on believing the truth. One would have to assume the truth in that meaning would at least have to have some relevance or contextual relevance to the Scripture you cited. Otherwise you are simply making a political prophecy - and if you do that then you will have to reap what you sow because you use the Lord's name to uphold it.

You have just alluded to another sense of that same precept in your last post here.

The Lord has spoken to me on this issue

I take it that this latter allusion is to reduce the falsehood of the Scripture you quoted to press your claim.

 

[ZNP]

Then it seems strange that the Lord told you not to take the vaccine, but not all believers.
So as two brothers postet in 2016 that the Lord told them who will be the next president. To one brother he said it will be Clinton and to the other it will be Trump.

If the Lord is against the vaccine, he would let it know to all believers.
So I cant trust you in this matter.

Why would that be strange? I had recovered, I had natural immunity, I saw no reason to get the vaccine, yet they were mandating an experimental vaccine which violates the Nuremberg code, they lied about this saying it was approved and yet pulling a bait and switch giving people the experimental vaccine. They were censoring anyone who had questions, ridiculing and mocking them. That is all I knew at the time I decided not to take it.

However, I did not have conclusive proof that it was harmful, and by the time it was mandated half of my church had already taken it. I was clear for myself not to take it, and anyone who asked I was more than willing to share my testimony and since I was interviewed on the local news everyone I worked with and went to church with knew where I stood. But I never considered this a matter of the faith nor did I feel I had clear evidence to tell people not to take it. Also, it is a health decision which depends a lot on your personal situation.

That said, in my resignation letter I made it clear that my resignation should be seen by others as the clearest and strongest statement I could make that something was rotten.

 

[ZNP]

So Teacher, what has the Lord said that makes the vaccine for Sars-coV-2 and the divisions that are being witnessed in families and between believers so pertinent that it is necessary to make a prophetic claim to the Scripture that validates' divisions based on believing the truth. One would have to assume the truth in that meaning would at least have to have some relevance or contextual relevance to the Scripture you cited. Otherwise you are simply making a political prophecy - and if you do that then you will have to reap what you sow because you use the Lord's name to uphold it.

What?

You have just alluded to another sense of that same precept in your last post here.

No idea what you are saying.

I take it that this latter allusion is to reduce the falsehood of the Scripture you quoted to press your claim.

Whoa. No wonder you are speaking in gobbledegook

 

[ZNP]

Ezekiel 3:16 And it came to pass at the end of seven days, that the word of Jehovah came unto me, saying, 17 Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.

It takes time for you to know clearly, in this case it took Ezekiel 7 days. With the vaccine it may take us 7 years. You don't jump in right away saying the vaccine is terrible until you know for certain.

18 When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thy hand.

One thing we do know about this vaccine is that it was created by "the wicked". Fauci has lied repeatedly, his lies are documented, and his lies have cost tens of thousands of American lives and maybe many more than that worldwide. The more we dig into this the more wicked it appears.

19 Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

Thank you Lord. Despite the threats and insults from some posters on this thread and the censorship and cancel culture and all that the wicked throw our way, as long as we speak what the Lord has charged us to speak we will deliver our soul. This is exactly what they teach you in life saving class. Before you can snatch another soul from the fire make sure your soul is out of the fire.

20 Again, when a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteous deeds which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thy hand. 21 Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he took warning; and thou hast delivered thy soul.

 

[Rhomphaeam]

What?

No idea what you are saying.

Whoa. No wonder you are speaking in gobbledegook

Sure I am, brother.

 

[Rhomphaeam]

Ezekiel 3:16 And it came to pass at the end of seven days, that the word of Jehovah came unto me, saying, 17 Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.

It takes time for you to know clearly, in this case it took Ezekiel 7 days. With the vaccine it may take us 7 years. You don't jump in right away saying the vaccine is terrible until you know for certain.

18 When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning, nor speakest to warn the wicked from his wicked way, to save his life; the same wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thy hand.

One thing we do know about this vaccine is that it was created by "the wicked". Fauci has lied repeatedly, his lies are documented, and his lies have cost tens of thousands of American lives and maybe many more than that worldwide. The more we dig into this the more wicked it appears.

19 Yet if thou warn the wicked, and he turn not from his wickedness, nor from his wicked way, he shall die in his iniquity; but thou hast delivered thy soul.

Thank you Lord. Despite the threats and insults from some posters on this thread and the censorship and cancel culture and all that the wicked throw our way, as long as we speak what the Lord has charged us to speak we will deliver our soul. This is exactly what they teach you in life saving class. Before you can snatch another soul from the fire make sure your soul is out of the fire.

20 Again, when a righteous man doth turn from his righteousness, and commit iniquity, and I lay a stumblingblock before him, he shall die: because thou hast not given him warning, he shall die in his sin, and his righteous deeds which he hath done shall not be remembered; but his blood will I require at thy hand. 21 Nevertheless if thou warn the righteous man, that the righteous sin not, and he doth not sin, he shall surely live, because he took warning; and thou hast delivered thy soul.

There you go, brother. Right back into a religious daze.

 

[ZNP]

Why is Fauci "evil"?

I made this claim and should support it.

1. Fauci was a key advisor to Trump when the pandemic first hit the US. We knew the first to be sick from it were in Wuhan, China and we knew it was a coronavirus. Fauci knew that he had funded research into coronaviruses at the Wuhan Bioweapons lab. Did he tell President Trump or his team? No. Did he contact people he knew there to ask them about the virus? No. While Trump and Peter Navarro were arguing to have a shut down of air travel to China Fauci was arguing against it. By itself it can simply be seen as bad judgement on his part with some ugly inferences of xenophobia. But taken together with the fact that he didn't notify them of his knowledge of the research at the Wuhan lab or contact those he knew for their perspective it can be seen as gross negligence on his part that led to the deaths in the US and the shut down.

2. Fauci then orchestrated a phony baloney letter claiming there was no evidence of this virus originating in the bioweapons lab and instead said all the evidence pointed to a bat cave hundreds of miles away. This was criminal and makes him responsible at least in part for obstructing the investigation into the greatest crime in human history. Not only so but his involvement with the research at the Wuhan lab was a violation of US law and was in itself criminal.

3. Then Fauci lied to Senator Rand Paul during Senate hearings about this. Lying to the Senate hearing is also a crime.

These three points are sufficient to show he has behaved criminally and should be held accountable at least in part with the greatest crime in world history, yet this is not all.

4. He held up the states that followed his instructions on how to deal with the pandemic as "the gold standard" while accusing others of risking super spreader events and being irresponsible. However, his advice violated basic science. As a result those that followed his advice had the highest death rates and those that didn't had the lowest. Once again you can assume he is incompetent, but that is unlikely.

5. Then at this time it was leaked that HCQ and Ivermectin could be used to treat this, Fauci ridiculed, attacked, and blocked doctors from prescribing this. Once we have the clear evidence that not only is Ivermectin and HCQ effective but even more this was published prior to the pandemic and Fauci's actions killed people.

6. Fauci also referenced studies on social distancing. However, that study indicated that the benefit could be gotten with three feet yet he mandated six feet. This was not a small difference. With three foot distance we could have kept schools and businesses open. But with six feet you can't. all of the damage from the shut down can be put on the shoulders of Fauci.

7. Finally these masks are a sick joke. The vast majority of masks are not beneficial at reducing the spread of the disease and yet they are very clearly bad for your health and promote pneumonia, especially among kids. In the final analysis they will determine these masks were an unnecessary mandate with great harm.

 

[cv5]

IVM shut down by Bill Gates and bribery. Caught and recorded RED HANDED on a zoom call...
https://www.peakprosperity.com/2021-year-in-review-the-rise-of-centralized-healthcare/#frontline

Tess Lawrie Versus Andrew Hill – Dark Forces. A strange dialog transpired that gets at the forces underlying the response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Andrew Hill, a visiting fellow at Liverpool University, examined data from clinical studies and came out strongly in support of Ivermectin. He then inexplicably did an about-face and became a detractor, using the same data from the original paper and simply reversing his stance. Tess Lawrie, director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy and reputed to be one of the best-of-breed, challenged him on why he switched via a Zoom call. She recorded it. What emerged was a tale of huge payola and sinister forces cornering Hill. Kennedy recounts it in his tome.ref 1 The World Tribune summarized it.ref 2 In a nutshell, the Gates Foundation put $40 million into the University’s coffers to alter Andrew’s views. He admitted the fraud and was dismissive because it would only set back Ivermectin release by 6 weeks. Laurie pointed out the death toll in those six weeks, implying what I have been saying: there are many guilty of high crimes in this sordid tale. With further pressure, Hill admitted that Unitaid, a Gates Foundation subsidiary that lobbies governments for pharma, “has a say in the conclusions of the paper.” Here is a taste of the exchange.

Lawrie: I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.​

Hill: You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.​

Lawrie: Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground …You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So, this will come out, and you will be culpable….​

Andrew is apparently making a living now accusing the doctors and scientists who support ivermectin of medical fraud. Hill and his backers are some of the worst people in human history. They are responsible for the deaths of millions.”​

~ Dr. Pierre Kory, of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance​

 

[cv5]

Israeli research: Vaccines don’t prevent serious COVID-19, but Vitamin D does
Israeli research: Vaccines don’t prevent serious COVID-19, but Vitamin D does
Sunday, February 06, 2022 by: Cassie B.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-02-06-israeli-research-vaccines-serious-vitamin-d.html

(Natural News) Many people choose to get vaccinated against COVID-19 because health authorities insist they reduce a person’s risk of experiencing a more severe case of the virus. However, data from Israel indicates this may not be the case.

In fact, most of the severe cases of the virus at one of the country’s biggest hospital complexes are being found in people who have received at least three doses of the vaccine. This is according to the hospital’s coronavirus ward director.

Israel is an interesting place to study this type of data because it has one of the greatest rates of vaccination in the world at around 90%. Moreover, many of the country’s high-risk patients have even received a fourth shot.

Professor Yaakov Jerris of the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center – Ichilov Hospital, the country’s second-biggest hospital, said that between 70 and 80 percent of the serious cases they are currently seeing are among vaccinated individuals.

He added: “So, the vaccine has no significance regarding severe illness, which is why just 20 to 25 percent of our patients are unvaccinated.”

Moreover, despite Israel’s high vaccination rate, there were more cases of COVID-19 identified in the country in January of this year than in all of 2021, according to the Times of Israel.

Last month, the preliminary results of a major study in Israel found that getting a fourth booster of the Pfizer vaccine is only partially effective when it comes to protecting against the omicron variant. This is consistent with a report from the German government, which revealed that more than 95 percent of omicron cases in that country were among vaccinated individuals.

Brighteon.TV
Vaccines may not protect against serious illness, but vitamin D helps

However, Israeli scientists have revealed one very helpful piece of information. They say they have now obtained the most convincing evidence yet that vitamin D supplements can help patients with COVID-19 to reduce their risk of serious illness or death.

Using research that was carried out during the country’s first two waves of the virus, which was before the vaccines were available, the peer-reviewed study by researchers from the Galilee Medical Center and Bar-Ilan University said the impact of vitamin D was so strong that they could actually predict just how well infected patients would fare simply by looking at their ages and vitamin D levels. The study was published in the journal PLOS One.

One of the researchers, Dr. Amiel Dror, said: “We found it remarkable, and striking, to see the difference in the chances of becoming a severe patient when you are lacking in vitamin D compared to when you’re not.”

According to Dr. Dror, vitamin D’s ability to strengthen the immune system allows it to address viral pathogens attacking the respiratory system in an effect that is just as relevant for omicron as it was for previous variants.

Preliminary findings that were published by the researchers in June showed that 26 percent of COVID-19 patients who were deficient in vitamin D shortly before hospitalization ended up dying, compared to just three percent of those who had normal vitamin D levels. Moreover, hospitalized COVID-19 patients who had a vitamin D deficiency were 14 times more likely than other individuals to end up in critical or severe condition.

The researchers also addressed the common question among scientists of whether any recent health conditions in patients could have skewed the results. To determine whether vitamin D deficiency was a symptom or a contributing factor, they looked at the patients’ vitamin D levels during the two years prior to being infected by the virus.

Dror said: “We checked a range of timeframes, and found that wherever you look over the two years before infection, the correlation between vitamin D and disease severity is extremely strong.”

The study’s wide scope means it can provide the world with compelling evidence that boosting your levels of vitamin D can be highly advantageous during the pandemic.

Sources for this article include:

WND.com

TimesOfIsrael.com

 

[gb9]

Israeli research: Vaccines don’t prevent serious COVID-19, but Vitamin D does
Israeli research: Vaccines don’t prevent serious COVID-19, but Vitamin D does
Sunday, February 06, 2022 by: Cassie B.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-02-06-israeli-research-vaccines-serious-vitamin-d.html

(Natural News) Many people choose to get vaccinated against COVID-19 because health authorities insist they reduce a person’s risk of experiencing a more severe case of the virus. However, data from Israel indicates this may not be the case.

In fact, most of the severe cases of the virus at one of the country’s biggest hospital complexes are being found in people who have received at least three doses of the vaccine. This is according to the hospital’s coronavirus ward director.

Israel is an interesting place to study this type of data because it has one of the greatest rates of vaccination in the world at around 90%. Moreover, many of the country’s high-risk patients have even received a fourth shot.

Professor Yaakov Jerris of the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center – Ichilov Hospital, the country’s second-biggest hospital, said that between 70 and 80 percent of the serious cases they are currently seeing are among vaccinated individuals.

He added: “So, the vaccine has no significance regarding severe illness, which is why just 20 to 25 percent of our patients are unvaccinated.”

Moreover, despite Israel’s high vaccination rate, there were more cases of COVID-19 identified in the country in January of this year than in all of 2021, according to the Times of Israel.

Last month, the preliminary results of a major study in Israel found that getting a fourth booster of the Pfizer vaccine is only partially effective when it comes to protecting against the omicron variant. This is consistent with a report from the German government, which revealed that more than 95 percent of omicron cases in that country were among vaccinated individuals.

Brighteon.TV
Vaccines may not protect against serious illness, but vitamin D helps

However, Israeli scientists have revealed one very helpful piece of information. They say they have now obtained the most convincing evidence yet that vitamin D supplements can help patients with COVID-19 to reduce their risk of serious illness or death.

Using research that was carried out during the country’s first two waves of the virus, which was before the vaccines were available, the peer-reviewed study by researchers from the Galilee Medical Center and Bar-Ilan University said the impact of vitamin D was so strong that they could actually predict just how well infected patients would fare simply by looking at their ages and vitamin D levels. The study was published in the journal PLOS One.

One of the researchers, Dr. Amiel Dror, said: “We found it remarkable, and striking, to see the difference in the chances of becoming a severe patient when you are lacking in vitamin D compared to when you’re not.”

According to Dr. Dror, vitamin D’s ability to strengthen the immune system allows it to address viral pathogens attacking the respiratory system in an effect that is just as relevant for omicron as it was for previous variants.

Preliminary findings that were published by the researchers in June showed that 26 percent of COVID-19 patients who were deficient in vitamin D shortly before hospitalization ended up dying, compared to just three percent of those who had normal vitamin D levels. Moreover, hospitalized COVID-19 patients who had a vitamin D deficiency were 14 times more likely than other individuals to end up in critical or severe condition.

The researchers also addressed the common question among scientists of whether any recent health conditions in patients could have skewed the results. To determine whether vitamin D deficiency was a symptom or a contributing factor, they looked at the patients’ vitamin D levels during the two years prior to being infected by the virus.

Dror said: “We checked a range of timeframes, and found that wherever you look over the two years before infection, the correlation between vitamin D and disease severity is extremely strong.”

The study’s wide scope means it can provide the world with compelling evidence that boosting your levels of vitamin D can be highly advantageous during the pandemic.

Sources for this article include:

WND.com

TimesOfIsrael.com

many truth tellers and doctors were saying this about vitamin d 2 years ago.

and many got banned of the internet for saying it.