Did man land on the moon?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Did man land on the moon?


  • Total voters
    68
Jul 9, 2020
846
492
63
you also think that the earth is flat ( haha).

you believe so many things that are totally true, then go off the rails with non-sense like this..
I suspect flat earth is a psyop. Get smart people to promote something totally unbelievable for 99.99999% of people in order to discredit everything else they say. I think flat earthers are getting played.

Note: I would absolutely LOVE to be wrong about flat earth! It would be such powerful evidence of God! But when you're searching for truth, you can't let your emotion and desires cloud your understanding of facts.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,402
6,740
113
I suspect flat earth is a psyop. Get smart people to promote something totally unbelievable for 99.99999% of people in order to discredit everything else they say. I think flat earthers are getting played.

Note: I would absolutely LOVE to be wrong about flat earth! It would be such powerful evidence of God! But when you're searching for truth, you can't let your emotion and desires cloud your understanding of facts.

the same thing i say.

lots of folks will listen to the truth, but when you start up with " the earth is flat". " the moon landing was fake" , " the space shuttle did not blow up", " Israel secretly runs all the world's economies ", all that non-sense, folks are done listening to you, and it discredits everything else you say.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,166
30,313
113
... Back to the topic, so according to the official story (at least what I was watching) the Lunar landing had to re-dock with the Columbia craft, while it was going 6,000 mph. This is another thing, that I don't think it's possible, but who am I to know what's right or wrong?
Earth rotates at a speed of about 1,000 miles (1600 kilometers) per hour and orbits
around the Sun at a speed of about 67,000 miles (107,000 kilometers) per hour :geek::unsure::geek:
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,402
6,740
113
What is the truth about the moon landing in your mind?

to me, the moon landing yes or no, the earth is flat, zionism secretly runs the world economy, things like that are irrelevant. they just suck the air out of the conversation and have little to no bearing on trying to wake people up to the satanic system we are all under.
 

Lanolin

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,188
113
haha I think this forum is for them so you can swoop in and let them know the truth, whther they care about people on the moon or not, its just a quirky conversation starter. It slike a. big 'wow look at me look at me' mum kind of thing. Look what I did!
Yes kid, we're watched it on the tv, now go do the dishes.

It strange that no women landed on the moon, wonder why not, would it have interfered with menstrual cycles or something.

I think the apple pie vs pumpkin pie thing is more interesting. Since when did apple pies become american and pumpkin pies did not?
 

kinda

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2013
3,948
1,507
113
Earth rotates at a speed of about 1,000 miles (1600 kilometers) per hour and orbits
around the Sun at a speed of about 67,000 miles (107,000 kilometers) per hour :geek::unsure::geek:
It just wasn't the speed that was concerning, it was the docking at high speed. You don't see large container ships being loaded up, while the ship is going 20 knots. This was sort of the point I was making.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,247
1,663
113
Do you question the moon landing at all, or do you believe it hook, line, and sinker?

I may question the moon landing, but I try to listen to both sides of the story. Maybe the truth is somewhere in the middle?

Traveling 500,000 miles and not having a failed mission, seems unlikely. The Challenger blew up 73 seconds after lift off, but all moon missions were successful?!?! As far as odds are concerned, I think the doubters on the moon landing, would win a bet.
There is really no question about it. I was part of the team that tracked the entire Apollo 11 mission from launch to recovery. It really did happen.
 

kinda

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2013
3,948
1,507
113
Don’t forget Apollo 13, where we’re supposed to believe that these guys were like Mcguyver, and used bits of plastic and duct tape to fix a major problem and then successfully re- enter Earths atmosphere and land safely in the ocean.
Absurdity.
Duct tape is so handy. :)
 

kinda

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2013
3,948
1,507
113
There is really no question about it. I was part of the team that tracked the entire Apollo 11 mission from launch to recovery. It really did happen.
Nice. That is pretty cool that you worked for NASA. Were you involved in any other part of the mission, or just tracking?

Did you ever meet Gus Grissom? Did you have any doubts of the mission?

I heard one of NASA coordinators had serious concerns about the mission and he wrote a detailed transcript of his concerns. He and his family were found dead in car, that was hit by a train.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,247
1,663
113
It just wasn't the speed that was concerning, it was the docking at high speed. You don't see large container ships being loaded up, while the ship is going 20 knots. This was sort of the point I was making.
I spent a lot of time on an aircraft carrier. Many times, we connected underway with a tanker or supply ship. The tanker or supply ship had ships on both sides. There's also a multitude of air to air refueling pictures around. There are many hazards in the water and air that make connecting difficult, but it all boils down to relative speed. In space the hazards aren't there.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,247
1,663
113
Nice. That is pretty cool that you worked for NASA. Were you involved in any other part of the mission, or just tracking?

Did you ever meet Gus Grissom? Did you have any doubts of the mission?

I heard one of NASA coordinators had serious concerns about the mission and he wrote a detailed transcript of his concerns. He and his family were found dead in car, that was hit by a train.
Just tracking. I never had the privilege of meeting any of the astronauts.

I believe that then incident you are asking about was the result of the man trying to outrun the train to a crossing.

My job was to keep the tracking hardware working.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,614
9,127
113
to me, the moon landing yes or no, the earth is flat, zionism secretly runs the world economy, things like that are irrelevant. they just suck the air out of the conversation and have little to no bearing on trying to wake people up to the satanic system we are all under.
I know. That’s what you said before.

I’m asking what your opinion is on whether we stepped foot on the moon.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,402
6,740
113
I know. That’s what you said before.

I’m asking what your opinion is on whether we stepped foot on the moon.

if i had to say one way or the other, i would say that there is a 60% chance that the lunar landing was real
 

kinda

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2013
3,948
1,507
113
Just tracking. I never had the privilege of meeting any of the astronauts.

I believe that then incident you are asking about was the result of the man trying to outrun the train to a crossing.

My job was to keep the tracking hardware working.

Thanks for joining the discussion. You must laugh at us skeptics?!?! Thanks for humoring me. I won't take offence, if you undermine the moon hoax theory, it will keep the discussion balanced.

So, I have a few questions for you. What training do you have? Did you work for NASA? What was a brief description of your duties on the mission?

What's your take on the Van Allen Radiation Belts? Do you think it's possible to pass through them, on the way to the moon, with the technology from the 60's?




I spent a lot of time on an aircraft carrier. Many times, we connected underway with a tanker or supply ship. The tanker or supply ship had ships on both sides. There's also a multitude of air to air refueling pictures around. There are many hazards in the water and air that make connecting difficult, but it all boils down to relative speed. In space the hazards aren't there.
Going 6,000 mph though around the moon, with no previous experience, is questionable to me. I hope you understand that side. One guy calculated the odds of going to the moon and back were like, .0067% chance.
 

kinda

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2013
3,948
1,507
113
Top 10 Reasons for Critical Thinking about the Moon Landings
1. Nixon, the President who had to resign for lying, wanted to beat the Russians by 1969
and had to justify spending $40 billion on the space program to the American taxpayers.
All the 6 claimed landings were in 3 years (1969-1972) during Nixon's administration.
2. Russia's Luna 16 achieved Moon Rock Retrieval by Remote Control (MRRRC) in 1970.
NASA has been suspiciously silent about Grumman's Lunar Module Truck for MRRRC.
Natural forces such as meteors hitting the Moon, also propelled rocks to the Earth.
NASA declared the Apollo sites to be No Close Orbit Zones, preventing close inspection.
3. Van Allen Belts are fields of deadly radiation above Earth orbit from 1000 - 25000 miles
with up to 100 REM per hour. Humans can safely take only 1 REM per month (EPA.Gov).
4. NASA now honestly admits the Orion space capsule requires thick radiation shielding,
making it heavier, requiring the new, stronger Space Launch System with 3 boosters.
California Academy of Science estimated 6 inches of lead shielding is required.
Orion mission scientist Kelly Smith says we could not go through the Van Allen Belt.
NASA astronaut USAF Colonel Terry Virts said "We only can fly in Earth orbit."
5. Many original plans and tapes from mission suspiciously "lost" or "accidentally erased"
6. Astronauts should have jumped much higher in 1/6 of Earth's gravity.
7. Questions and answers between the Earth and Moon were faster than the speed of light.
8. Astronauts caught in the act faking view of a far Earth, out window from low orbit.
9. Major chemical differences between the Moon rocks from China's lander and Apollo's
10. Numerous photo anomalies: non-parallel shadows, C rock, backgrounds re-used.
Hollywood movie technology for simulations was the world's best in 1969.
Overly detailed, elaborate stages under the name of "simulations" to be cited as real.
11. Not enough room in the LEM for 189 air tanks for Apollo 16's 3 days on the Moon
12. Not enough electrical power in the batteries for cooling, lighting, and broadcasting


http://moontruth.org/
 

kinda

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2013
3,948
1,507
113
John H. Mauldin has a bachelor's degree in engineering physics (Cornell University, master's in physics (Purdue University), and Ph.D. in science education (University of Texas). He has four books published in science and technology covering mathematical graphics in Perspective Design (1985; second edition now being prepared), physics in Particles in Nature (1986), solar energy in Sunspaces (1987), and optics in Light, Lasers, and Optics (1988). He has taught physics and engineering at several colleges and universities, done education research and development at MIT and University of Texas, and worked at NASA in electronic power engineering on an early phase of the Voyager missions.

Cosmic particles are dangerous, come from all sides, and require at least 2 meters of solid shielding all around living organisms.

Solar (or star) flares of protons, an occasional and severe hazard on the way out of and into planetary systems, can give doses of hundreds to thousands of REM over a few hours at the distance of Earth [b-Lorr]. Such does are fatal and millions of times greater than the permitted dose. Death is likely after 500 REMs in any short time.

The Apollo capsule was not even 1/10 meter thick, the Van Allen Belts have over 100 REM/hour, so the astronauts could not have survived going to the Moon.

http://moontruth.org/
 

kinda

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2013
3,948
1,507
113
“Moon hoax” investigator Bill Kaysing said: “I believe that Thomas Baron was murdered because he had the truth to tell about the Apollo project.”

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/nasa-moon-landing-space-apollo-16778152

1614627284779.jpeg


http://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/07/910-was-nasa-whistleblower-thomas-baron.html

Baron began to draft on his own a more detailed 500-page report. After the Apollo 1 fire, which took the lives of Grissom, White and Chaffee on January 27, 1967, Baron delivered this report to the committees of the US Congress that were investigating the disaster and on April 21, 1967 testified before a subcommittee governed by Congressman Olin Teague.

One week after testifying, Baron and his family were killed when their car was struck by a train at a level crossing. His full-length report was never made public and has since vanished.