AI Robots and Beast System Tech
- Thread starter HealthAndHappiness
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
There are videos talking about human clones, and cloning facilities. There was the actor, Jack Black, who indicated "They kill you and clone you if you try to walk away."
I'd be happy if it were not real, but I think the sad reality is that such evil technology has been in use for decades. It's only now we are finding out about it, though.
I'd be happy if it were not real, but I think the sad reality is that such evil technology has been in use for decades. It's only now we are finding out about it, though.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
My understanding is they are revealing to the world what they have known for the last 20 years. Lot of predictive programming on this. Also on Bannon's war room they went over the technology, we already have all the pieces that are required. So just like the UFO's which for 50 years were big league tin foil hat conspiracy until the day they admitted, oh yeah, all that is true.
-
1
- Show all
Tzipora counselled against cloning when she learned it was actually very real and very evil, and not just the stuff of sci-fi cartoons. Unfortunately, it was too late for the Great Chieftain (x3) and also GG's awesome mom (x2 I think?) But what could the somewhat-evil-but-also-trying-to-be-somewhat-good-genius do? He couldn't very well kill them - that would be even worse (I think!)
-
1
- Show all
It isn't a joke to me. My understanding is they have been desperate to get everyone's DNA so they could clone them. All those "Covid tests" were so crucial because what they wanted was your DNA.
Think about this, why would a slave owner want to kill their slaves with this pandemic? That doesn't make sense. However, I can understand why slave owners would like to replace a rebellious slave with a submissive one that they cloned in the lab.
Think about this, why would a slave owner want to kill their slaves with this pandemic? That doesn't make sense. However, I can understand why slave owners would like to replace a rebellious slave with a submissive one that they cloned in the lab.
-
1
- Show all
Yeah, I didn't even think about that. Crazy.
Somewhat off-topic, but what about time travel then? I can't believe in time travel, because it would seem to have the ability to usurp God's power. But then, that's the attitude I used to have with cloning, and it seems I was wrong on that. There are some pretty convincing stories of people time traveling (i.e. the people telling the stories seem pretty convinced). Either it's real (which I doubt), or they've done such a good job in convincing a few people they actually traveled backward (or forward) in time.
Somewhat off-topic, but what about time travel then? I can't believe in time travel, because it would seem to have the ability to usurp God's power. But then, that's the attitude I used to have with cloning, and it seems I was wrong on that. There are some pretty convincing stories of people time traveling (i.e. the people telling the stories seem pretty convinced). Either it's real (which I doubt), or they've done such a good job in convincing a few people they actually traveled backward (or forward) in time.
I don't think it is essential, though the story of Enoch does peripherally touch on it. 2nd I don't like to theorize on things I cannot substantiate, you are very likely to be wrong and in the process you sound like a nut job.
That said I also have heard many testimonies concerning this. Suppose life is a simulation. When you die it is like taking off the goggles and now you are no longer in the simulation. That could explain why people who died felt like they were gone for two weeks when in reality it was five minutes. On the other hand you have Enoch who was raptured and then supposedly 400 years later he returns.
I think what is far more likely is they have something called "looking glass" which allows them to see into the future in a way that can be likened to predicting the weather.
I think we are going to discover many things that we thought were fantasy are in fact reality.
That said I also have heard many testimonies concerning this. Suppose life is a simulation. When you die it is like taking off the goggles and now you are no longer in the simulation. That could explain why people who died felt like they were gone for two weeks when in reality it was five minutes. On the other hand you have Enoch who was raptured and then supposedly 400 years later he returns.
I think what is far more likely is they have something called "looking glass" which allows them to see into the future in a way that can be likened to predicting the weather.
I think we are going to discover many things that we thought were fantasy are in fact reality.
Here's some information about Tv programming thru to recent technology. I'm not convinced of everything on here, but the Hulu commercials half way through I agree with Richie's message about it.
Programming our minds with technology. Parents, Hulu
Programming our minds with technology. Parents, Hulu
-
1
- Show all
Just past the section about "Sigils used by the occult for conjuring demons" at 14:20 begins the important part. Please take note. There are technologies developed and tested with many billions of dollars of our tax dollars. They are currently utilized for manipulation of the global minds, opinions and directives.
The one inventor Richie covers is only a speck of detail that will hopefully give us a glimpse of the enemies devices.
"Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices."
II Corinthians 2:11
The one inventor Richie covers is only a speck of detail that will hopefully give us a glimpse of the enemies devices.
"Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices."
II Corinthians 2:11
I learned about this in college at Rice University back in the 80s. At the time I didn't have a TV and hadn't been watching TV for several years. However, about 20 years later I did get a TV. The situation had gotten so bad that you could not have a conversation with anyone if you weren't familiar with TV shows. However, by that time I was ruined, could not stand the commercials but was too cheap to pay to get rid of them. I tried to watch the news and mute the commercials but it was torture and soon enough I just gave up trying and decided to get my news from the radio. But a few years later a kid at high school tells me that no one watches TV anymore they all watch Youtube. I had no idea you could watch the news on Youtube. So it seems I have been able to avoid a lifetime of mind control and this may explain why the world has become so strange and foreign to me over that time. I remember when there would be an inflight movie on an airplane, if you wanted to watch it you paid for the headphones. Later I flew on a plane and every single seat had a TV?! Likewise have you ever been to a restaurant where it was wall to wall TV's? Whatever happened to going out to eat a good meal and spend time talking to someone?
Suppose a person watches 3 hours of TV every day, that works out to about 1,000 hours a year and 40,000 hours since my days at college. It is no joke how big an impact they could have on you given 40,000 hours. To make things worse I have read that many people average 8 hours a day!
Suppose a person watches 3 hours of TV every day, that works out to about 1,000 hours a year and 40,000 hours since my days at college. It is no joke how big an impact they could have on you given 40,000 hours. To make things worse I have read that many people average 8 hours a day!
-
1
- Show all
I never subscribed to it, but what I gather is that Hulu is a network of programs over internet that is competing with cable TV.
Short Hulu Ad
Rice U is a prestigious university. If you don't mind putting it out there, what was your major? It's a good thing we gave up Television. I don't think we'd have any more interest in the things of the Lord, or the world He made if we spent that time glued to it like so many. It is mesmerizing. I attended online classes on brain disorders and learned that TV can be a contributing factor for dementia. I found that out through a loved one. He followed my advice and cancelled Cable and cut out aspartame. He reversed dementia without medical help of any kind.
I feel that way about restaurants too. Just the noise of the TV's makes it difficult to hear your friends and family in order to have a conversation.
Short Hulu Ad
Rice U is a prestigious university. If you don't mind putting it out there, what was your major? It's a good thing we gave up Television. I don't think we'd have any more interest in the things of the Lord, or the world He made if we spent that time glued to it like so many. It is mesmerizing. I attended online classes on brain disorders and learned that TV can be a contributing factor for dementia. I found that out through a loved one. He followed my advice and cancelled Cable and cut out aspartame. He reversed dementia without medical help of any kind.
I feel that way about restaurants too. Just the noise of the TV's makes it difficult to hear your friends and family in order to have a conversation.
Sorry if I already asked. Now that you mentioned it, I think I remember you saying that before. That background must give you insight that helps understand the natural (or man made) geological phenomenon in the news recently. What do you think about the volcanos recently? Is that typical of modern history, but just not reported about much before?
We have had 26,698 earthquakes that are 2.5 or greater in the last year.
In 1950 we had 506 earthquakes that were 2.5 or greater.
That is an increase of 50x or if you prefer percent that is 5,000% increase.
This is not an anomaly, you can see from the 1980s on we have seen a dramatic rise in earthquakes. I would think this would be Front page news, instead hardly a peep about it.
We have also seen a very big rise in meteorites hitting our atmosphere.
Neither of these two events are related to "man made climate change" yet the increase is very alarming.
Instead we hear every single day about climate change. One of my professors at Rice was one of the very first to go to Antarctica and examine the cores to see what our previous atmosphere was so I have been following this closely for over 40 years.
What alarms me the most is how all these sites that talk about climate change have stopped talking about the models. The models were a centerpiece of Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth". Models are critical to science, they demonstrate that we understand the factors and how they interact. That is why I find it very disturbing that the models are completely off and instead of talking about that they ignore it.
Here are the facts, the number of weather related events has increased, the scale of them has increased. In other words both the amplitude and the frequency of this curve has increased. That means we have a tremendous amount of energy added to the system. However, sea level has not risen an appreciable amount. This is bizarre, the events have risen much more than we modeled and sea level rise has not risen much if at all. Meanwhile we have seen the ice at the North pole melt significantly, we have seen magnetic north move significantly, and we are even seeing evidence that the thermohaline conveyor belt may be shutting down.
My point is we are seeing some really big and alarming things happening on earth and the current theory of "Climate change" is not explaining what we are seeing and it can't.
In 1950 we had 506 earthquakes that were 2.5 or greater.
That is an increase of 50x or if you prefer percent that is 5,000% increase.
This is not an anomaly, you can see from the 1980s on we have seen a dramatic rise in earthquakes. I would think this would be Front page news, instead hardly a peep about it.
We have also seen a very big rise in meteorites hitting our atmosphere.
Neither of these two events are related to "man made climate change" yet the increase is very alarming.
Instead we hear every single day about climate change. One of my professors at Rice was one of the very first to go to Antarctica and examine the cores to see what our previous atmosphere was so I have been following this closely for over 40 years.
What alarms me the most is how all these sites that talk about climate change have stopped talking about the models. The models were a centerpiece of Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth". Models are critical to science, they demonstrate that we understand the factors and how they interact. That is why I find it very disturbing that the models are completely off and instead of talking about that they ignore it.
Here are the facts, the number of weather related events has increased, the scale of them has increased. In other words both the amplitude and the frequency of this curve has increased. That means we have a tremendous amount of energy added to the system. However, sea level has not risen an appreciable amount. This is bizarre, the events have risen much more than we modeled and sea level rise has not risen much if at all. Meanwhile we have seen the ice at the North pole melt significantly, we have seen magnetic north move significantly, and we are even seeing evidence that the thermohaline conveyor belt may be shutting down.
My point is we are seeing some really big and alarming things happening on earth and the current theory of "Climate change" is not explaining what we are seeing and it can't.
-
1
- Show all
We have had 26,698 earthquakes that are 2.5 or greater in the last year.
In 1950 we had 506 earthquakes that were 2.5 or greater.
That is an increase of 50x or if you prefer percent that is 5,000% increase.
That is amazing!
This is not an anomaly, you can see from the 1980s on we have seen a dramatic rise in earthquakes. I would think this would be Front page news, instead hardly a peep about it.
I agree.
We have also seen a very big rise in meteorites hitting our atmosphere.
Neither of these two events are related to "man made climate change" yet the increase is very alarming.
When I mentioned (man made), I was thinking of the speculation of Harp like systems, as well as other technologies activating volcanos, earthquakes and hurricanes. I never believed the man made global warming hypothesis. There are a couple credible sources saying that there's geo- engineering to cool regions with aerosolized particulates.
Instead we hear every single day about climate change. One of my professors at Rice was one of the very first to go to Antarctica and examine the cores to see what our previous atmosphere was so I have been following this closely for over 40 years.
What alarms me the most is how all these sites that talk about climate change have stopped talking about the models. The models were a centerpiece of Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth". Models are critical to science, they demonstrate that we understand the factors and how they interact. That is why I find it very disturbing that the models are completely off and instead of talking about that they ignore it.
Here are the facts, the number of weather related events has increased, the scale of them has increased. In other words both the amplitude and the frequency of this curve has increased. That means we have a tremendous amount of energy added to the system. However, sea level has not risen an appreciable amount. This is bizarre, the events have risen much more than we modeled and sea level rise has not risen much if at all. Meanwhile we have seen the ice at the North pole melt significantly, we have seen magnetic north move significantly, and we are even seeing evidence that the thermohaline conveyor belt may be shutting down.
Al Gore sponsors his scientists' trips to Antarctica once in a while and they keep getting stuck in the ice. Lol.
I keep hoping he's right so our growing season in WV is longer and in hopes that the politicians in the DC swamp will drown. Lol
My point is we are seeing some really big and alarming things happening on earth and the current theory of "Climate change" is not explaining what we are seeing and it can't....
In 1950 we had 506 earthquakes that were 2.5 or greater.
That is an increase of 50x or if you prefer percent that is 5,000% increase.
That is amazing!
This is not an anomaly, you can see from the 1980s on we have seen a dramatic rise in earthquakes. I would think this would be Front page news, instead hardly a peep about it.
I agree.
We have also seen a very big rise in meteorites hitting our atmosphere.
Neither of these two events are related to "man made climate change" yet the increase is very alarming.
When I mentioned (man made), I was thinking of the speculation of Harp like systems, as well as other technologies activating volcanos, earthquakes and hurricanes. I never believed the man made global warming hypothesis. There are a couple credible sources saying that there's geo- engineering to cool regions with aerosolized particulates.
Instead we hear every single day about climate change. One of my professors at Rice was one of the very first to go to Antarctica and examine the cores to see what our previous atmosphere was so I have been following this closely for over 40 years.
What alarms me the most is how all these sites that talk about climate change have stopped talking about the models. The models were a centerpiece of Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth". Models are critical to science, they demonstrate that we understand the factors and how they interact. That is why I find it very disturbing that the models are completely off and instead of talking about that they ignore it.
Here are the facts, the number of weather related events has increased, the scale of them has increased. In other words both the amplitude and the frequency of this curve has increased. That means we have a tremendous amount of energy added to the system. However, sea level has not risen an appreciable amount. This is bizarre, the events have risen much more than we modeled and sea level rise has not risen much if at all. Meanwhile we have seen the ice at the North pole melt significantly, we have seen magnetic north move significantly, and we are even seeing evidence that the thermohaline conveyor belt may be shutting down.
Al Gore sponsors his scientists' trips to Antarctica once in a while and they keep getting stuck in the ice. Lol.
I keep hoping he's right so our growing season in WV is longer and in hopes that the politicians in the DC swamp will drown. Lol
My point is we are seeing some really big and alarming things happening on earth and the current theory of "Climate change" is not explaining what we are seeing and it can't....
This is not some strange theory that you can combine waves to form new and different waves. That is standard theory of waves.
Also, we know a microwave can be used to heat up water, so it should not come as some great surprise that these waves could be used to start fires, or even tornadoes, etc.
What is cool about this concept is that if you used a laser it would cut everything from the satellite from which it was fired to the end point. But by having two separate satellites both send harmless waves to an end point where they combine and cause a fire or something else would mean there would not be a trail that leads all the way back to the satellite. It would be a far more discreet weapon.
Also, we know a microwave can be used to heat up water, so it should not come as some great surprise that these waves could be used to start fires, or even tornadoes, etc.
What is cool about this concept is that if you used a laser it would cut everything from the satellite from which it was fired to the end point. But by having two separate satellites both send harmless waves to an end point where they combine and cause a fire or something else would mean there would not be a trail that leads all the way back to the satellite. It would be a far more discreet weapon.