O'Reilly is GONE!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

seed_time_harvest

Senior Member
#121
Dec 9, 2011
14,112
1,798
113
#121
Billyd said:
We could make a serious dent in the false filing with a law requiring the plaintiff to pay the legal fees of the defendant when the plaintiff loses the suit.
Click to expand...
Gotta be fair though,If the defendant Is rich,they should be penelized If they lose,hopefully money goes to a charity of the plaintiffs choosing.
 
Billyd

Billyd

Senior Member
#122
May 8, 2014
5,217
1,622
113
#122
seed_time_harvest said:
Gotta be fair though,If the defendant Is rich,they should be penelized If they lose,hopefully money goes to a charity of the plaintiffs choosing.
Click to expand...
If the defendant loses, he should pay court costs, and plaintiff's legal fees, along with what ever the plaintiff is awarded in damages. It's up to the plaintiff where he puts what he is awarded.
 
Tommy379

Tommy379

Notorious Member
#123
Jan 12, 2016
7,589
1,153
113
#123
seed_time_harvest said:
Gotta be fair though,If the defendant Is rich,they should be penelized If they lose,hopefully money goes to a charity of the plaintiffs choosing.
Click to expand...
Whats fair about penalizing someone because of their wealth?
 
S

seed_time_harvest

Senior Member
#124
Dec 9, 2011
14,112
1,798
113
#124
Billyd said:
If the defendant loses, he should pay court costs, and plaintiff's legal fees, along with what ever the plaintiff is awarded in damages. It's up to the plaintiff where he puts what he is awarded.
Click to expand...
:pDon't be so law minded,be righteous minded.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#125
#125
seed_time_harvest said:
Gotta be fair though,If the defendant Is rich,they should be penelized If they lose,hopefully money goes to a charity of the plaintiffs choosing.
Click to expand...
What am I missing here? If a defendant is guilty are they not already penalized under the law? If you bring false claims against a person you should be punished. If the defendant is guilty they are punished under the law already.
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#127
Jul 31, 2013
37,776
13,534
113
#127
S

seed_time_harvest

Senior Member
#128
Dec 9, 2011
14,112
1,798
113
#128
Tommy379 said:
Whats fair about penalizing someone because of their wealth?
Click to expand...
Because If they have wealth and they do something wrong to someone,penalizing them the same way you would to someone that doesn't have much would not hurt them much because they are rich.:)
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#129
#129
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#130
#130
seed_time_harvest said:
Because If they have wealth and they do something wrong to someone,penalizing them the same way you would to someone that doesn't have much would not hurt them much because they are rich.:)
Click to expand...
Laws are equal, remember,justice is blind....
 
S

seed_time_harvest

Senior Member
#131
Dec 9, 2011
14,112
1,798
113
#131
kaylagrl said:

He is,we dont punish people because they have money. Thats a secular idea from socialism/communism which go hand in hand.
Click to expand...
:)I feel slow minded right now because Im not sure what you are saying,read my post again.:)
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#132
#132
seed_time_harvest said:
:)I feel slow minded right now because Im not sure what you are saying,read my post again.:)
Click to expand...
Maybe Id better ask...Are you saying people with money should be punished differently or harsher?
 
Willie-T

Willie-T

Banned
#135
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#135
seed_time_harvest said:
Because If they have wealth and they do something wrong to someone,penalizing them the same way you would to someone that doesn't have much would not hurt them much because they are rich.:)
Click to expand...
I would have to agree with Seed here. If I was rich, and knew I could get away with sexual harassment by only being fined a few hundred bucks each time (as the court might normally fine an average person), I would never worry too much about being found guilty... even a hundred times.

We have no problem with rich corporations being fined huge sums, (multiple millions) far more than the average person would be fined for the same offence (such as a slippery floor or loose carpeting in my small Mom & Pop store), so why should an individual with millions to burn be only find a few thousand?

But, I also feel that big fine should go to a charity (no write off) rather than an individual getting rich because their feelings got hurt a little.
 
Last edited:
Tommy379

Tommy379

Notorious Member
#136
Jan 12, 2016
7,589
1,153
113
#136
seed_time_harvest said:
Because If they have wealth and they do something wrong to someone,penalizing them the same way you would to someone that doesn't have much would not hurt them much because they are rich.:)
Click to expand...
I don't think you understand what a tort is. Maybe you should google it. No one is found guilty or innocent in a tort case. The kind of legal case involving Bill O'Reilly or anyone else concerning sexual harassment is a tort. No where in the United States is it a crime to coment on womans appearance or ask another person for sex.

In a tort, the plaintiff must show the defendant had a duty, breached the duty, that caused an injury to the plaintiff. That injury to the plaintiff is going to be quantified into a monetary value. The monetary value of the injury to the plaintiff is the same regardless of the wealth of the defendant.

Now on to punitive damages. Some jurisdictions allow for it, many don't. In all cases, compensation for the injury must be determined first. In a tort, the fact finder only needs to find a preponderance of the evidence to make a judgement. Many jurisdictions that allow for punitive awards, require a higher standard of proof from the evidence. Even if the case involves suche behavior that warrants punitive damages, the wealth of the defendant should not matter.

I just think seed time harvest may be an old school communist that has a hatred for the successful.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#137
Jul 3, 2015
59,890
29,275
113
#137
Tommy379 said:
I don't think you understand what a tort is. Maybe you should google it.
Click to expand...
Here is what I found when I googled it :)

plumtorte.jpg

plum-torte-cake.jpg

Would you like some tea with that torte?

TeaLilacscc.jpg
 
Willie-T

Willie-T

Banned
#138
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#138
I think the Military has the right way about fines. They usually fine with a forfeiture of "x" number of month's income.

For me, that might be $5,000.

For a richer man, it might be $900,000.
 
Sirk

Sirk

Banned
#139
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
#139
The way to fix it is to shut off the tv. Seems that very few have the integrity to get that done.
 
Sirk

Sirk

Banned
#140
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
#140
Willie-T said:
I think the Military has the right way about fines. They usually fine with a forfeiture of "x" number of month's income.

For me, that might be $5,000.

For a richer man, it might be $900,000.
Click to expand...
Seedtime agrees with you because seedtime harbors the sin of envy. That way, seedtime can decide who or what equates to being "rich".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.