Have I attacked you since we have known each other here?! I have been here longer than most. I have gone out of my way to be clear in my intent, I have contacted people privately where I saw an issue. And rather than coming to me in private so I could clarify any misunderstanding you block me. Unbelievable. CC never fails to amaze me. And we wonder why people don't want to be a part of Christianity. Even sinners understand the concept of forgiving one another. smh Unreal.
Zionism among the Evangelicals is contradicted by Scripture
- Thread starter IsaiahA
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
L
No, because the full context has to be applied. Replacing a word does not give full context in fact it robs from the context. Simply read chapter 11 as thought it were not written as a separate writing. That it is a thought that flows from previous chapters and into following chapters.
I dont know why you keep thinking that i some how sunscribe to replacement theology. I think you are reading your objections into what i have written.
I dont know why you keep thinking that i some how sunscribe to replacement theology. I think you are reading your objections into what i have written.
I did not comment on post 281. So do I get to charge you with attacking me?!! And no I didn't attack you "here" either. smh
"Have I attacked you since we have known each other here?! I have been here longer than most. I have gone out of my way to be clear in my intent, I have contacted people privately where I saw an issue. And rather than coming to me in private so I could clarify any misunderstanding you block me. Unbelievable. CC never fails to amaze me. And we wonder why people don't want to be a part of Christianity. Even sinners understand the concept of forgiving one another. smh Unreal."
No personal attack in what I said and I didn't comment on 281. I sure don't know how you would take it if you were actually personally attacked as some do here. I have no reason to "personally attack" you. I don't know you personally. We've disagreed here a couple times and I have gone out of my way to make sure we were still CC "friends". So it would have been common curtsy for you to PM me if you felt "attacked" and ask if there was an issue since I would have no reason to turn on you out of the blue. CC is becoming a joke. I've PMed people here over a misunderstanding and they asked forgiveness and we have gone on our way. Seems to get worse here every day.
-
1
- Show all
My guess this thread is now dead to its topic. Betting that when one puts folks on ignore it messes wiht the posts numbers. This is what my page tells me post # 281 is... i highlighted the most offending line in bold black. Along wiht the implications made in the post to me this is a personal attack. Any more postings to this will be in ignore.
This phrase is being attributed to me, post 281
"You're already lost on all this since you hate Jews so much, but other Christians need to know this about God's ability to keep promises and how much He still loves His people, Israel."
It is a phrase that I never wrote and I would appreciate a mod getting involved here. If I wrote something I will stand behind it. Mods here know me well enough by now. I would appreciate this issue be settled asap. The comment did not come from me and I am being falsely accused. Please straighten out this issue so the thread can continue. Thank you.
"You're already lost on all this since you hate Jews so much, but other Christians need to know this about God's ability to keep promises and how much He still loves His people, Israel."
It is a phrase that I never wrote and I would appreciate a mod getting involved here. If I wrote something I will stand behind it. Mods here know me well enough by now. I would appreciate this issue be settled asap. The comment did not come from me and I am being falsely accused. Please straighten out this issue so the thread can continue. Thank you.
L
Sticking with the analogy of the tree. Dispensationalism proposes that there is 2 trees a gentile tree and a jew tree, but there is not. There is one tree and that is of faith, sons of Abraham. The gentiles are grafted into that tree, and some jews are broken off.
The fulfillment of the promise to Abraham is through Christ Jesus.
The fulfillment of the promise to Abraham is through Christ Jesus.
-
2
- Show all
Over the years dispensationalism has morphed into many isms . So many folks who hold to dispensationalism do not have the understanding of its beginnings, believing it is just the way things are. As a child i understood Scofields notes to be scripture because his notes were printed in the Bible. Dumb yup, but the plan worked many bought into his teaching lock stock and barrel. Family has one of the first editions of his version cant remember any more if is 1909 or 06...
here is a short example of Scofield's notes Jesus said...
Mat 13:30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
Scofiels' notes on verse Mat 13:30 he wrote this
The gathering of the tares into bundles for burning does not imply immediate judgment. At the end of this age (Mat_13:40) the tares are set apart for burning, but first the wheat is gathered into the barn
History tells us Scofield the man was not a good guy, yet we are all sinners that is between him and God.
here is a short example of Scofield's notes Jesus said...
Mat 13:30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
Scofiels' notes on verse Mat 13:30 he wrote this
The gathering of the tares into bundles for burning does not imply immediate judgment. At the end of this age (Mat_13:40) the tares are set apart for burning, but first the wheat is gathered into the barn
History tells us Scofield the man was not a good guy, yet we are all sinners that is between him and God.
AS one of the fathers of dispensationalism i would think his words matter:
Scofields' note page 250 Sco ref Bible ,
turn thy captivity
The Palestinian Covenant gives the conditions under which Israel entered the land of promise. It is important to see that the nation has never as yet taken the land under the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant, nor has it ever possessed the whole land (cf. Gen_15:18; Num_34:1-12. The Palestinian Covenant is in seven parts.
Bible says
Jos 21:43 And the LORD gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.
Jos 21:44 And the LORD gave them rest round about, according to all that he sware unto their fathers: and there stood not a man of all their enemies before them; the LORD delivered all their enemies into their hand.
Jos 21:45 There failed not ought of any good thing which the LORD had spoken unto the house of Israel; all came to pass.
Through out the forums words written by the fathers of movements are scrutinized, as should be, but we people tend to play favorites .
Scofields' note page 250 Sco ref Bible ,
turn thy captivity
The Palestinian Covenant gives the conditions under which Israel entered the land of promise. It is important to see that the nation has never as yet taken the land under the unconditional Abrahamic Covenant, nor has it ever possessed the whole land (cf. Gen_15:18; Num_34:1-12. The Palestinian Covenant is in seven parts.
Bible says
Jos 21:43 And the LORD gave unto Israel all the land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they possessed it, and dwelt therein.
Jos 21:44 And the LORD gave them rest round about, according to all that he sware unto their fathers: and there stood not a man of all their enemies before them; the LORD delivered all their enemies into their hand.
Jos 21:45 There failed not ought of any good thing which the LORD had spoken unto the house of Israel; all came to pass.
Through out the forums words written by the fathers of movements are scrutinized, as should be, but we people tend to play favorites .