Why I now believe that salvation can be lost.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,050
411
83
I showed the most basic evidences in post 4455. If you can't see the differences, then I really don't know what else to say. Willful denial when faced with the evidence...what else is there to say?

MM
Your 4455 did not address any of my questions. There are no two gospels. There is only gospel!

Gal 1:6-9
6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— 7 which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned! 9 As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!
NIV

You should take this passage to heart. I certainly do!
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,050
411
83
I showed the most basic evidences in post 4455. If you can't see the differences, then I really don't know what else to say. Willful denial when faced with the evidence...what else is there to say?

MM
Well...YOU could explain the differences and why there are differences, since you think you understand.
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,179
213
63
Christ is the end of the law for all who believe... On my phone so I can't look it up and post it at the same time but I can come back and add the verse citation as an edit... Romans 10:4
The believing Jews found the transition the most difficult, with them remaining zealous for the Law:

[Act 21:20 KJV] 20 And when they heard [it], they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law:

As a Jewish crowd pleasing gesture, Paul went to purify himself as a show to the believing Jews, that he was still one of them, even though the Gentiles did not have to keep learn and the Law and the works therein. It is at that time that Paul was arrested and eventually sent to Rome where he was executed. The Jews never found it an easy thing to let go of what they had been raised to adore and follow, and so they as followers of Christ remained zealous for the Mosaic Law, and were never chastised for such by the original apostles, and yet Paul taught Jews in the outlying regions to leave the Law behind, and that REALLY bothered the believing Jews in Jerusalem...at least until the severe persecutions drove them out and away from the city and the temple they so loved... The transition was a hard one for them.

MM
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,179
213
63
Well...YOU could explain the differences and why there are differences, since you think you understand.
This goes to the mystery revealed ONLY to Paul, and no other before him, not even the prophets nor revealed by Jesus Himself lest Satan and the princes be alerted and they then NOT seek to have Jesus crucified. If you don't understand that mystery, and dwell upon it, and thus willing to study on your own to show yourself approved, then that's your problem. As the old saying goes, one can lead a horse to water, but can't make it drink.

MM
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
61,138
30,285
113
The believing Jews found the transition the most difficult, with them remaining zealous for the Law:

[Act 21:20 KJV] 20 And when they heard [it], they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law:

As a Jewish crowd pleasing gesture, Paul went to purify himself as a show to the believing Jews, that he was still one of them, even though the Gentiles did not have to keep learn and the Law and the works therein. It is at that time that Paul was arrested and eventually sent to Rome where he was executed. The Jews never found it an easy thing to let go of what they had been raised to adore and follow, and so they as followers of Christ remained zealous for the Mosaic Law, and were never chastised for such by the original apostles, and yet Paul taught Jews in the outlying regions to leave the Law behind, and that REALLY bothered the believing Jews in Jerusalem...at least until the severe persecutions drove them out and away from the city and the temple they so loved... The transition was a hard one for them.

MM
I believe Peter chastised them (Jewish believers) in Acts saying why are you laying on them (Chriatian converts) a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? Speaking in reference to law keeping. Again I'm still on my phone, I believe it's in Acts 15.
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,179
213
63
Folks, if we lounge around, indirectly demanding that we are like the fat, lazy emperors who lounged around waiting for our "salves" to feed us each grape without us having to lift one lazy finger, as opposed to getting up off our duffs, going out to pick the grapes from the vine ourselves, wash them, then sit back and lift each grape to our own mouths, that luxury is something people get while going to churchianity, where their preacher they pay to feed them the tidbits of morsel like warm little fuzzies...I'm not of that caliber.

I will provide the basics, and ask that others do their part when wanting answers...things that others cannot be expected to spoon feed them like their slave, institutional, hirling pastors. That's what they pay their hireling pastors to do. I'm not looking for a following, and so expect others to take what was given and do some homework on their own.

MM
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,179
213
63
I believe Peter chastised them (Jewish believers) in Acts saying why are you laying on them (Chriatian converts) a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? Speaking in reference to law keeping. Again I'm still on my phone, I believe it's in Acts 15.
Yes. That was Acts 15. Very well said.

MM
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,050
411
83
Folks, if we lounge around, indirectly demanding that we are like the fat, lazy emperors who lounged around waiting for our "salves" to feed us each grape without us having to lift one lazy finger, as opposed to getting up off our duffs, going out to pick the grapes from the vine ourselves, wash them, then sit back and lift each grape to our own mouths, that luxury is something people get while going to churchianity, where their preacher they pay to feed them the tidbits of morsel like warm little fuzzies...I'm not of that caliber.

I will provide the basics, and ask that others do their part when wanting answers...things that others cannot be expected to spoon feed them like their slave, institutional, hirling pastors. That's what they pay their hireling pastors to do. I'm not looking for a following, and so expect others to take what was given and do some homework on their own.

MM
So your assumption is: When someone doesn't see things as you do "after you did your homework", then we didn't do ours? But this is a nice excuse you post for not wanting to answer tough questions -- even though your lame excuse doesn't square with scripture.

1 Peter 3:15a
15 But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.

NIV

Peter didn't say, he when someone asks you a question about something, just tell them to get up off their fat, lazy duffs and show the scriptures their elbows and rear ends.

But thanks for posting this. It shows me where your heart is and how it despises the gifts that God has given to his church, such as pastors, teachers, etc. Your arrogance is duly noted...
 

Everlasting-Grace

Well-known member
Dec 18, 2021
6,066
1,948
113
That's basically what I said! The Abrahamic Covenant is an unconditional covenant.
Yes, And the land promise is part of that covenant;
1. The land was given to Abraham, And God promised he would make in this land a great nation

Gen 12: To a land that I will show you. 2 I will make you a great nation;

2. He tells us the boundary of the land he would give him.

Gen 15: 18 On the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying:

“To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the River Euphrates— 19 the Kenites, the Kenezzites, the Kadmonites, 20 the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Rephaim, 21 the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.”


3. He gave Abraham, and his descendants all the land, as an everlasting or eternal gift.

Rev 17: 8 Also I give to you and your descendants after you the land in which you are a stranger, all the land of Canaan, as an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.”

In all of this, He also said he would be the father of many nations.. but this is separate from this one nation

However, both the Covenants of Circumcision and the Law of Moses are conditional.

Yes, In order to live in the land promised. in order to live in peace as God promised. God gave them the law. and said you will be blessed if you follow my commands

here, again Lev 26 answers all your questions. If they obey...

26 ‘You shall not make idols for yourselves;
neither a carved image nor a sacred pillar shall you rear up for yourselves;
nor shall you set up an engraved stone in your land, to bow down to it;
for I am the Lord your God.


2 You shall [a]keep My Sabbaths and reverence My sanctuary:
I am the Lord.
3 ‘If you walk in My statutes and keep My commandments, and perform them,

4 then I will give you rain in its season, the land shall yield its produce, and the trees of the field shall yield their fruit. 5 Your threshing shall last till the time of vintage, and the vintage shall last till the time of sowing;
you shall eat your bread to the full, and dwell in your land safely.
6 I will give peace in the land, and you shall lie down, and none will make you afraid; I will rid the land of evil beasts, and the sword will not go through your land.

this is what they must do to enjoy the land given to them

But if they do not do this, and disobey, then there are 7 proceeding groups of disciplines God will impose on them to try to get them to repent. The final form of discipline, as I showed. is total destruction of their cities and high places. they will be removed from the land. and taken as slaves to the land of their enemies. where they will be made slaves.

And this happened 3 times in the past

1. Assyria destroyed th enorthern kingdom of Israel
2. Babylon destroyed the southern kingdom of Judah
3. Rome destroyed the totality of Israel in 70 AD. and it remains desolate even until today.

But even after this, Jesus said, If you repent, and confess. i will remember my covenant.

The mosaic covenant does not overule the abrahamic covenant.


So, how did God remove Israel's ability to obey the Mosaic Law Covenant, i.e. use the Land?
Lev 26 explains this. Did you even read it?

Also, God kept his promise in Lev 26:45, since he brought both Israel and Judah back to the land twice -- once after the Assyrian captivity and once after the Babylonian captivity.
Actually the northern kingdom was never brought back. It will not be brought back until the future when the bones are restored to life. and God brings these two nations together again, and back to the land, and they will not sin their sins anymore or commit their trespasses anymore. (ezek 37)

Judah was removed, then Judah was brough back into the land, but they were never restored. He just allwed them back into the land as slaves..




There's nothing in Lev 26 that proves me wrong.
There is nothing there that proves you right, However. it does prove what I have been saying to be correct.

In fact, the chapter and the chapters 28 and 29 in Deut all prove me right: that obedience to the Mosaic Law Covenant was absolutely required to remain in the land.
Which is what I have been saying since we first started talking. do you listen to what others are saying?

this is not the argument, the argument is that God is done with Israel.


Nothing you posted here proves me wrong..
Nothing you have posted proves me wrong.. Yawn



I already proved that the Land was a type of spiritual rest that is only found in Christ.
That does not negate the fact that the land was an unconditional gift. And as Paul said, the gifts of God are irrevocable

I guess you didn't understand Heb 4:8? Do you even know when God spoke "LATER about another [different] day" (obviously later than Joshua and therefore later than the Law was given? And do you know what God promised when he spoke later about another day? And I have proven that "everlasting" or "forever" is often used in the limited sense. What you fail to understand is that the Land was given to Abraham's special seed, which consisted of his natural and spiritual descendants -- with the latter always being God's small remnant!

This is what happens when you Dispens read the OT back into the New! You absolutely get everything backwards. The OT, logically and biblically, must be understood in the scheme of progressive revelation, whereby the NT (or more precisely the New Covenant) more fully reveals the Old through all its many antitypes. The NC is hidden in the Old and Old is revealed in the New. And we see this truth displayed in Gal 3 thru 5, whereby Paul explains the Abrahamic Covenant through the lens of the NC. For your info, the New Covenant is the only true eternal covenant (containing no types!) since in eternity the three persons of the Godhead covenanted together to save mankind. And this NC, which Christ himself embodies, will never end either!

You're so enamored by the gifts and blessings of the Abrahamic Covenant, such as the Land, that you can't see, along with Paul, that Christ is the locus of that covenant. He's at the epicenter of the covenant. He's the warp 'n' of all scripture because the central purpose to the Abrahamic Covenant was so God would make a people for himself through which the promised "seed of the woman" (Gen 3:15) would come into this world so that her "seed" would one day save mankind and crush the head of the serpent! You cannot see the sheer beauty and majesty of the forest, not to mention the incomprable wisdom of God, in his eternal redemptive plan for mankind, because you have your nose so firmly planted in the material blessings instead of the One from whom all blessings flow, i.e. Christ! The physical land that you're so excited and ecstatic about was just a necessary prop in God's grand plan. The physical land was needed so that a physical people would have a place to live in the world. The Law of Moses was neccessary so that the phsycial people could become a peculair nation governed by God's incomprable law. The nation was needed so that the promisef Messiah would have a definite identity with a patricular people. And to make the promised Messiah's identity more certain to all in the world, it was necessary for him to be identified with a particular tribe within that nation. And to narrow it down even further so that there would be absolutely no mistaking the true identity of the Messiah when he arrived in this world, God ordained his Son's family line. An awful lot of phsycial stuff was planned by God so that at the right time, He could get to the real spiritual substance of his salvation -- Christ! Christ is the antitype to both the Sabbath rest AND the Land rest. So Christ is where or focus should be.

Even when God promised Abraham that he would make a great nation from him, so many think God was ultimately referring to Israel or even to Ishmael. But he wasn't! He was alluding, according to the NT, to the NC Church, which is the Body of Christ! Israel was just a vehicle to get to the Body of Christ! Israel was the God-ordained means to the end. Ditto for all the physyical blessings and promises -- they were all means to the utlimate spiritual substance -- Christ! None of this implies that God has now discared Israel like an old rag because Israel has served its purpose. As Paul teaches in Rom 9 thru 11, "all Israel will be saved", according to election. All true Israel that is in phsycial Israel will be saved. The children of the promise will still be saved but not the children according to mere natural descent. Natural descent means nothing spirituall! But at the same time Abraham's spriritual seed consists of one people -- all in the world who have his faith. And this one people share one eternal, spiritual destiny!
non of this proves your point, or proves me wrong.

The gift of God is irrevokable. God did nto take the land promise and give it to the church

He has not renigged on his promise to israel

They will repent. and God will restor them just like he said he would..
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,883
645
113
James 2:21, 24-25
21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? ...
24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
25 Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent [them] out another way?
There are NOT two salvation plans. It is only by God's grace, not man's works.

"Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac?" Carefully reading the verse tells us that "WAS NOT" and "WHEN" imply that before Abraham offered up Isaac, he was already justified (see Rom 4:2 below). Abraham had been justified through the faith and works of Christ, which were freely attributed to Abraham, prompting his actions—it did not stem FROM/BY/AFTER his offering of Isaac. Both faith and works, required from Christ alone (not Abraham), were necessary to achieve salvation and accompanying Christian attributes —his actions were a consequence of his justification, not its cause. Justification is entirely bestowed by a gracious God through Christ as a gift, not earned through works regardless of who it might be. This interpretation is also true with other references in James concerning justification, as well as throughout the Bible. Abraham was NOT justified by his works.

[Rom 4:2, 9-10 KJV]
2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath [whereof] to glory; but not before God. ...
9 [Cometh] this blessedness then upon the circumcision [only], or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.
10 How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,179
213
63
So your assumption is: When someone doesn't see things as you do "after you did your homework", then we didn't do ours? But this is a nice excuse you post for not wanting to answer tough questions -- even though your lame excuse doesn't square with scripture.
I didn't mean to give that impression. No. When you refuse the most basic of evidence, and claim there's nothing there, then not much else will suffice when your beliefs blind you to the evidence. Paul and James say opposite things, both of which are true, but not for everyone throughout all of time, and when you deny it, then what else can anyone show to you that would make any difference. You've made up your mind about it all. Case closed.

MM
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,179
213
63
There are NOT two salvation plans. It is only by God's grace, not man's works.

"Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac?" Carefully reading the verse tells us that "WAS NOT" and "WHEN" imply that before Abraham offered up Isaac, he was already justified (see Rom 4:2 below). Abraham had been justified through the faith and works of Christ, which were freely attributed to Abraham, prompting his actions—it did not stem FROM/BY/AFTER his offering of Isaac. Both faith and works, required from Christ alone (not Abraham), were necessary to achieve salvation and accompanying Christian attributes —his actions were a consequence of his justification, not its cause. Justification is entirely bestowed by a gracious God through Christ as a gift, not earned through works regardless of who it might be. This interpretation is also true with other references in James concerning justification, as well as throughout the Bible. Abraham was NOT justified by his works.

[Rom 4:2, 9-10 KJV]
2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath [whereof] to glory; but not before God. ...
9 [Cometh] this blessedness then upon the circumcision [only], or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.
10 How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.
Then can you please show to me how "grace" can co-exist with the requirement to have to "persevere unto the end"? Which is it? Is it GRACE or is it PERSEVERENCE? (CAPS for emphasis only.) How do you define those terms?

MM
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,883
645
113
Then can you please show to me how "grace" can co-exist with the requirement to have to "persevere unto the end"? Which is it? Is it GRACE or is it PERSEVERENCE? (CAPS for emphasis only.) How do you define those terms?

MM
Explain how? Yes, it By God's grace alone. The saints persevere only by God and His work within them:
their perseverance is a result, not a cause.

[1Pe 1:4-5 KJV]
4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,179
213
63
Explain how? Yes, it By God's grace alone. The saints persevere only by God and His work within them:
their perseverance is a result, not a cause.

[1Pe 1:4-5 KJV]
4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
Peter was an apostles to Israel, not the Gentiles. Please stick with Paul, and where he ever said that the Gospel of Grace involved having to persevere. You created from your own imagination anyone saying that perseverance is from God into us. Jesus said this:

Matthew 24:13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

That says nothing about His offer for endurance, or perseverance, or whatever term one may choose from the different translations. It's on the strength of one's own endurance. There's no offer from the Lord for Him to provide that. Never once did Paul say to us to endure for salvation, otherwise it is not of grace.

MM
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,179
213
63
Explain how? Yes, it By God's grace alone. The saints persevere only by God and His work within them:
their perseverance is a result, not a cause.

[1Pe 1:4-5 KJV]
4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
5 Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
Do you understand what Paul said here?

Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then [is it] no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if [it be] of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.

Endurance, perseverance, that is a work, effort by one's own ability to endure against the wiles of the devil, and then they SHALL be saved. Dude, we are saved right now, not at some future time, as is clearly identified with "shall." That's future. When we believe by faith, then we are sealed by Holy Spirit. That sealing is absolute, and without question for anything on our part.

MM
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,883
645
113
Peter was an apostles to Israel, not the Gentiles. Please stick with Paul, and where he ever said that the Gospel of Grace involved having to persevere. You created from your own imagination anyone saying that perseverance is from God into us. Jesus said this:

Matthew 24:13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

That says nothing about His offer for endurance, or perseverance, or whatever term one may choose from the different translations. It's on the strength of one's own endurance. There's no offer from the Lord for Him to provide that. Never once did Paul say to us to endure for salvation, otherwise it is not of grace.

MM
Why did Paul preach a gospel different that Peter? Their foundation was the same gospel as there is but one gospel.

[2Pe 3:15-16 KJV]
15 And account [that] the longsuffering of our Lord [is] salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
16 As also in all [his] epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.


[Jhn
10:16 KJV] 16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, [and] one shepherd.
 

Musicmaster

Well-known member
Feb 8, 2021
1,179
213
63
Why did Paul preach a gospel different that Peter? Their foundation was the same gospel as there is but one gospel.
There had to be a difference, because if there were not, the Gentiles would have had to be instructed to become zealous for the Law. If you recall, the Jewish believers in Jerusalem were "zealous for the Law," and works remained the means for them, that they had to endure unto the end so that they THEN would be saved, just as Jesus instructed in Matthew 24.

Gentiles were not raised in that system of Law, works and zealousness for the Law. The Lord chose a mystery to be revealed ONLY through Paul whereby the Gentiles were saved through grace. If you will recall:

Ephesians 2:12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

When the Lord set aside Israel because of their rejection of Him, Gentiles could only acquire salvation through grace since Israel, having rejected and crucified the Lord were not about to remain the light to the world, because at that time, Gentiles had to become Jews in order to acquire salvation. Israel failed and fell, and so the Lord revealed what He knew would have to come to fruition what was hidden in Him from the creation of the world.

I'm glad you're asking these questions. They are good questions.

[2Pe 3:15-16 KJV]
15 And account [that] the longsuffering of our Lord [is] salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
16 As also in all [his] epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.


Wisdom is precisely the definition of "mystery," of which was revealed only to Paul. If we were to walk in the shoes of the Jews at that time, what Paul spoke was indeed hard for them to understand the mechanism by which Gentiles could be filled with Holy Spirit apart from becoming a Jew. Yes. They were shocked and amazed, as is indicated in the Acts of the Apostles, the Book of Acts.

[Jhn
10:16 KJV] 16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, [and] one shepherd.[/QUOTE]

Yes, there were many Jews scattered abroad, who were also His sheep. If you recall, the northern ten tribes, which comprised Israel, with Judah being the remaining tribes in the south, were still scattered abroad after having been conquered and taken captive by the Assyrians in about 722 BC. They were not of the two tribes of Judah after the split in the kingdom.

MM
 

rogerg

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2021
3,883
645
113
Do you understand what Paul said here?

Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then [is it] no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if [it be] of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.

Endurance, perseverance, that is a work, effort by one's own ability to endure against the wiles of the devil, and then they SHALL be saved. Dude, we are saved right now, not at some future time, as is clearly identified with "shall." That's future. When we believe by faith, then we are sealed by Holy Spirit. That sealing is absolute, and without question for anything on our part.

MM
Yes, I understand it- that can only happen through God and not by man or by his ability- God moves within to will and do of His good pleasure.
The "shall be saved" pertains to the salvation of the last day when those who have been saved during their lifetimes escape - saved - from the wrath of God, on the day of wrath.

[Rom 2:5 KJV] 5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God;

Did you miss this verse in my prior post?

[Rom 4:2 KJV] 2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath [whereof] to glory; but not before God.

I don't understand your reference to Rom 11:6, except to say that the works spoken of in it do not represent anything good - anything that can produce salvation but only God's wrath

Here, maybe these might help to clarify it for you

[Rom 11:5 KJV] 5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace.

[Rom 11:7 KJV] 7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded