Well it really is about perspective, that the point of my post. We all see in a different way and most of the time based on what we ourselves already believe to be truth. The ressurection jacobs trouble the furnishing of the saints those who refuse to take the mark of the beast and are slain for it, these are common things used by post trib believers, We read the same thing but see something else entirely who don't believe in the post trib.
You have seen the evidence just not believed, the fact it is evidence however is not to be mistaken as fact, in every investigation evidence is gathered to build a case for conviction but each piece of evidence is merely a part of the whole picture until enough is found to build a case against the accused person. Evidence itself is merely that evidence but until it becomes fact that is all it is.
My point was that we all read the same verses but we are biased what we believe to be the truth can be false to another believer, perception interpretation understanding, these things though we say we read and understand with the holy spirit are in fact a major factor in our understanding and beliefs in the doctrine and far to much instead of prepareing our hearts for the rapture or the tribulation or which ever one is the actual truth we argue and debating the same beaten horse over and over.
I lean more towards a prewrath or pretrib rapture but I also do not allow myself to close the possibility of a mid or post rapture either because no matter what I beleiev or how true I think my view is how often has God actually doen what we expect in the way we expected?
What if we believe in the pretrib or mid trib fully with all our hearts but the tribulation comes and we think we were left behind? What if we did not prepare our hearts for the coming tribulation because of what we ourselves thought was truth?
You have seen the evidence just not believed, the fact it is evidence however is not to be mistaken as fact, in every investigation evidence is gathered to build a case for conviction but each piece of evidence is merely a part of the whole picture until enough is found to build a case against the accused person. Evidence itself is merely that evidence but until it becomes fact that is all it is.
My point was that we all read the same verses but we are biased what we believe to be the truth can be false to another believer, perception interpretation understanding, these things though we say we read and understand with the holy spirit are in fact a major factor in our understanding and beliefs in the doctrine and far to much instead of prepareing our hearts for the rapture or the tribulation or which ever one is the actual truth we argue and debating the same beaten horse over and over.
I lean more towards a prewrath or pretrib rapture but I also do not allow myself to close the possibility of a mid or post rapture either because no matter what I beleiev or how true I think my view is how often has God actually doen what we expect in the way we expected?
What if we believe in the pretrib or mid trib fully with all our hearts but the tribulation comes and we think we were left behind? What if we did not prepare our hearts for the coming tribulation because of what we ourselves thought was truth?
This is what I am talking about.
There is zero evidence of a postrib rapture.
I challenge them regularly to post a verse.
They can not.
What do they do?
Tell me to post "a" verse.
Lol.....I got a boatload.