Your "red flags" include your impression that those meeting with the local churches follow the teachings of their "founding fathers." You did not mention what "teachings" you have a problem with, but from my experience, all of the teachings are directly from the Bible. You can hardly read a sentence without stumbling over Scripture references several times. EVERYTHING is backed up by Scripture. The teachings point you to Scripture, and suddenly you see what has been there for 2,000 years, but no one has really noticed. If you accept what the Bible says, are you following a man, or are you following the Bible? It is not the man who is not questioned; it is the Scripture that is not questioned.
As a quick example, consider "eating Christ." Jesus was born in Bethlehem, which means "house of bread," He was laid in a trough (a place for animal food), and He said, "I am the living bread that came down out of heaven" (Jn. 6:51). He also said, Eat me, and you will live because of Me" (Jn. 6:57). Have you ever seen the matter of eating Jesus? Has anyone ever preached that to you? And yet there it is in the Bible. I didn't see it until Lee pointed it out. All I can say is "Amen, HOW do I eat You, Lord?" [Note: Catholics think "the flesh profits" something with transubstantiation, contrary to the Lord's word in Jn. 6:63]
It has not been considered "absolutely necessary" for 2,000 years and yet Jesus said that we must eat Him to live because of Him. So, which should we change, our practice or the Lord's word?
Who the "founding fathers" are is a complicated issue. Watchman Nee saw that all Christians are one, and that there should be no divisions among us except where we practically happen to be. Witness Lee brought Nee's vision to the west and worked it out. However, they didn't invent something new, as they say themselves, "We are standing on the shoulders of those who have gone before us." Drawing on the entire history of Christianity and the entire Bible, they put together the whole vision of what the Bible is about. If that sounds far-fetched, consider, what does Paul mean when he says, "Making known to us the mystery of His will according to His good pleasure, which He purposed in Himself" (Eph. 1:9) What is God's "good pleasure?" What is "the mystery of His will?"
Has anyone ever told you what God's good pleasure is? Just a hint, it is not salvation. What were we created for? Salvation was just to bring us back onto the track of accomplishing God's will, which is according to His good pleasure. The key question is, What is God's will? What is His will for Himself which impelled Him to "stretch forth the heavens, lay the foundation of the earth, and form the spirit of man within him" (Zech. 12:1). The answer to that question is what unlocks the Bible and puts all the puzzle pieces together. That answer is what Nee and Lee discovered, and it has been hiding in the Bible in plain sight all along.
As a quick example, consider "eating Christ." Jesus was born in Bethlehem, which means "house of bread," He was laid in a trough (a place for animal food), and He said, "I am the living bread that came down out of heaven" (Jn. 6:51). He also said, Eat me, and you will live because of Me" (Jn. 6:57). Have you ever seen the matter of eating Jesus? Has anyone ever preached that to you? And yet there it is in the Bible. I didn't see it until Lee pointed it out. All I can say is "Amen, HOW do I eat You, Lord?" [Note: Catholics think "the flesh profits" something with transubstantiation, contrary to the Lord's word in Jn. 6:63]
It has not been considered "absolutely necessary" for 2,000 years and yet Jesus said that we must eat Him to live because of Him. So, which should we change, our practice or the Lord's word?
Who the "founding fathers" are is a complicated issue. Watchman Nee saw that all Christians are one, and that there should be no divisions among us except where we practically happen to be. Witness Lee brought Nee's vision to the west and worked it out. However, they didn't invent something new, as they say themselves, "We are standing on the shoulders of those who have gone before us." Drawing on the entire history of Christianity and the entire Bible, they put together the whole vision of what the Bible is about. If that sounds far-fetched, consider, what does Paul mean when he says, "Making known to us the mystery of His will according to His good pleasure, which He purposed in Himself" (Eph. 1:9) What is God's "good pleasure?" What is "the mystery of His will?"
Has anyone ever told you what God's good pleasure is? Just a hint, it is not salvation. What were we created for? Salvation was just to bring us back onto the track of accomplishing God's will, which is according to His good pleasure. The key question is, What is God's will? What is His will for Himself which impelled Him to "stretch forth the heavens, lay the foundation of the earth, and form the spirit of man within him" (Zech. 12:1). The answer to that question is what unlocks the Bible and puts all the puzzle pieces together. That answer is what Nee and Lee discovered, and it has been hiding in the Bible in plain sight all along.