That is NOT what happened, according to scripture...nowhere does it say that he was filled with the Spirit and then was baptized. Ananias told him he would receive his sight and be filled with the Spirit. Both of those things happened, but you are trying to change it around to fit your narrative.
You are getting the cart before the horse, and it goes directly against what Peter preached at Pentecost.
After Paul received his sight, he IMMEDIATELY rose up and was baptized. THAT is when he received the Spirit.... just as Peter had taught at Pentecost.
Peter did not say, "believe, let us lay hands on you, and you will receive the Spirit, oh, and then be baptized...."
He said "repent and be baptized and you will receive the Spirit." It cannot be explained any more simply than that.
You either believe one or the other.... it cannot be both.[/QUOTE
No, I am not trying to change anything. You forgot to add the full statement of Ananias in your quote of the text.
I am not denying both the empowering of the Holy Spirit, Paul's eyes healed, and he was baptized. We know he was healed of his eyes first. We know that Ananias told him he was there also to see him filled with the Holy Spirit as the text said not me.
I never said Peter suggested or require one to have hands laid on them to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. That was addressed in the House of Cornelious in Chapter 10:44-46 of Acts.
Jesus said you will receive power after the Holy Spirit comes upon you . Jesus said that to those who were saved already and had the Holy Spirit in them.
I AM NOT SUGGESTING a standard of methodology in context to empowering of the Holy Spirit we see in scripture
- those who were saved then filled
- those who were saved and empowered for a work imediatley
- those who were saved and had hands laid on them
- those who were saved an received empowerment but no hands laid on the.
The one constant is they were saved before or during the Filling of the Holy Spirit.