Saved by faith alone?

[rogerg]

And btw these passages are about the DEEP things of God which I already explained at least a year ago if not two.
NOT about the Gospel, so you can put those aside as you PROOF tests.

Your explanations are never correct because they do not emanate from the gospel's one and only true foundation - that Christ alone is Savior, and all that implies, but instead, are man based. For any conclusion to be correct, it must rest solely upon Christ, which yours don't and therefore are untrustworthy. Just because in your mind, you think you've explained something, is not reason for anyone else to believe or trust it - in fact, just the opposite is true. I am not surprised you are unable to comprehend/understand/accept my post as I didn't really expect you would because, at least so far, you are unable to see/recognize the spiritual.

 

[Magenta]

Your explanations are never correct because they do not emanate from the gospel's one and only true foundation - that Christ alone is Savior, and all that implies, but instead, are man based. For any conclusion to be correct, it must rest solely upon Christ, which yours don't and therefore are untrustworthy. Just because in your mind, you think you've explained something, is not reason for anyone else to believe or trust it - in fact, just the opposite is true. I am not surprised you are unable to comprehend/understand/accept my post as I didn't really expect you would because, at least so far, you are unable to see/recognize the spiritual.

Now now Roger, do you not realize that you are supposed to remember their posts from 2 years ago??? It's so unfair of you, if you want them to explain their unbiblical point of view again. Oh, And don't try telling us that you didn't read their posts from 2 years ago. Such a tactic will not work on us.

 

[rogerg]

Now now Roger, do you not realize that you are supposed to remember their posts from 2 years ago??? It's so unfair of you, if you want them to explain their unbiblical point of view again. Oh, And don't try telling us that you didn't read their posts from 2 years ago. Such a tactic will not work on us.

lol, yeah, I tried to slip one by them and they caught me- darn they're sharp.

 

[GWH]

And neither is speaking about the salvation of the spirit.

So you believe there is more than one salvation?!

 

[HeIsHere]

So you believe there is more than one salvation?!

Scripture uses "save" for the saving of the soul which is distinct from spiritual salvation (eternal life).

 

[Magenta]

Scripture uses "save" for the saving of the soul which is distinct from spiritual salvation (eternal life).

LOL. If the soul is not saved, eternal life is not the outcome.

 

[GWH]

Scripture uses "save" for the saving of the soul which is distinct from spiritual salvation (eternal life).

Well, you are the first soul I have met who said that, so please explain the difference per Scripture re GRFS.
Thanks!

 

[lrs68]

The Apostle Paul said he ran a good race and fought the good fight.

That is a lot of effort to be doing to think his Letters mean we do nothing because God does it all.

 

[HeIsHere]

Well, you are the first soul I have met who said that, so please explain the difference per Scripture re GRFS.
Thanks!

I will if you tell me what GRFS means?

 

[HeIsHere]

Well, you are the first soul I have met who said that, so please explain the difference per Scripture re GRFS.
Thanks!

Soul has more the one meaning, but yes sometimes it is used in that way.

 

[Magenta]

I will if you tell me what GRFS means?

Asking him to stop speaking his gibberish is like asking you to believe what the Bible says.

 

[Everlasting-Grace]

Well, the point is both how people react and encouraging them to be good soil.

If they are not saved. Then them doing good is not going to help them
what good is it if you do good then end up in hell because your faith was not real ?

 

[Everlasting-Grace]

Those who make it to heaven did not fail Gods test.

Lol
you better start being perfect my friend. Because if you fall one time. You failed Gods test

 

[Everlasting-Grace]

When you understand that James is speaking to another interlocutor than maybe you will understand the letters.

When you understand James is attacking a false gospel. Then maybe you will understand
either way. Nothing you say makes sense when reading James words

 

[HeIsHere]

When you understand James is attacking a false gospel. Then maybe you will understand
either way. Nothing you say makes sense when reading James words

Does he outline this false gospel?

 

[Everlasting-Grace]

James writing to people telling them they are not saved because they do not have works.
Paul must have been very pleased.

No
James told them to test their faith to make sure it was real and not just a claimed faith
all you are doing is continually twisting what James said to fit your doctrine
if you think a person can be saved and have no faith
talk about easy believes that’s rendering on universalism

 

[Everlasting-Grace]

Yes, Jam. 2:17 agrees exactly with Gal. 5:6.

Does it?

 

[Everlasting-Grace]

And neither is speaking about the salvation of the spirit.

Well James is

 

[HeIsHere]

No
James told them to test their faith to make sure it was real and not just a claimed faith
all you are doing is continually twisting what James said to fit your doctrine
if you think a person can be saved and have no faith
talk about easy believes that’s rendering on universalism

Oh yes, James is telling them to see if they have works so they know they are saved.
Lots of people do good works.

 

[Everlasting-Grace]

So you believe there is more than one salvation?!

Well he evidently believes we can be saved without faith
sounds almost Calvinistic