B
There is no proof that Matt 12 / Mark 5 & Luke 11 concerning binding the strong man has anything to do with Satan being bound for 1,000 years in the abyss with a lid on it. If that were true we would need not speak of any spiritual warfare or have to put on the whole armour of God to quench and stand against the wiles (deceit) of the devil. To believe that we are living presently in a 1,000 year reign of Christ with Satan having been bound according to Rev 20, is shameful and unintelligent with a faulty understand and reckless understanding of eschatology in relationship to the church and the savior of the church Jesus Christ. On top of that to actually believe that Rev 20 does not happen after Rev 19 and what are we to do about Rev 20:4? What do we do with those who were beheaded and refused the mark of the beast and then reigned with with Christ for 1,000 years. Have we missed the mark of the beast? Have we taken it on unconsciously without knowing it? It's been 2,000+ years since this was written. What have we missed? I am thinking that I have missed the wrath of God somehow and all that those angels poured out on the earth. Have I also missed the time of Jacob's trouble and the great tribulation that Jesus said was to come upon the earth? I have not seen the prophet, the beast, or his mark or anyone credible claiming that they are God in some temple? Where are those who have been beheaded for the Christ's sake? Where are those two prophets that are suppose to show up to preach and prophesy for some 3.5 years? Is this coming soon to a temple near me?
Can someone please help me put Rev 20 in the chronological context of when is to take place in relationship to the rest of the Revelation? John the apostle is not here so I need your help. Did John make a mistake when he wrote it all down or did the crowd that framed and canonized the scriptures put Rev 20 in the wrong place? My scrapbook is all messed up after listening to some of these amillennialist. According to them the kingdom of God has come to earth and I am to be living and reigning with Christ in that kingdom and don't even have a glorified body yet free from the old sin nature. If any of you know where that kingdom is and can direct me to it I would be mighty appreciative. All I have right now is my local church. I keep seeking the kingdom first and keep praying, 'thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven', but these amillennialist keep slapping me up side of the head with their doctrine and keep telling me to wake up, but all I can do is shake my hand yet nothing happens. Please don't tell me that I missed the second coming, that would really be discouraging and frightful. Who is going to step up and make it clear to me so that I can walk in the light and in the faith of the scriptures without error or misplaced understanding?
Can someone please help me put Rev 20 in the chronological context of when is to take place in relationship to the rest of the Revelation? John the apostle is not here so I need your help. Did John make a mistake when he wrote it all down or did the crowd that framed and canonized the scriptures put Rev 20 in the wrong place? My scrapbook is all messed up after listening to some of these amillennialist. According to them the kingdom of God has come to earth and I am to be living and reigning with Christ in that kingdom and don't even have a glorified body yet free from the old sin nature. If any of you know where that kingdom is and can direct me to it I would be mighty appreciative. All I have right now is my local church. I keep seeking the kingdom first and keep praying, 'thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven', but these amillennialist keep slapping me up side of the head with their doctrine and keep telling me to wake up, but all I can do is shake my hand yet nothing happens. Please don't tell me that I missed the second coming, that would really be discouraging and frightful. Who is going to step up and make it clear to me so that I can walk in the light and in the faith of the scriptures without error or misplaced understanding?