I think atheist are thinking in double standards, and I believe that none of them deny the existence of empathy
let's see here, no one can see, hear, smell, taste and textually touch the existence of empathy, it's as undetectable as carbon monoxide, yet carbon monoxide can be detected by scientific instruments
yet, empathy cannot be fit in a test-tube, and I highly doubt there's ever scientific data, or scientific proof as subjective experience cannot be objectively proven
On what grounds do atheist claim that empathy do exist? by what evidence?
why apply different standards to determine the existence of God?
if God is dismissed as nonexistence because of no physical existence, then what possible physical existence do empathy have? if none, why the double standard here?
let's see here, no one can see, hear, smell, taste and textually touch the existence of empathy, it's as undetectable as carbon monoxide, yet carbon monoxide can be detected by scientific instruments
yet, empathy cannot be fit in a test-tube, and I highly doubt there's ever scientific data, or scientific proof as subjective experience cannot be objectively proven
On what grounds do atheist claim that empathy do exist? by what evidence?
why apply different standards to determine the existence of God?
if God is dismissed as nonexistence because of no physical existence, then what possible physical existence do empathy have? if none, why the double standard here?