Hollywood rarely gets theology right.
Im sad to say im STILL undecided on the rapture. I wouldn't say im thrown away by every wind of doctrine, EXCEPT FOR when it comes to eschatology, in that sense im constantly flipping back and forth.
One day I come across something and think "Well that seals the deal" then I come across something else that completely debunks it lol.
But Occam's razor principle could apply here, and here is what I got from the Scriptures by just reading it without commentaries or asking anyone when I first started reading: Jesus returns once at the last trumpet, Revelation 11:15ff. YES i know i know it wasnt written yet when Paul wrote Corinthians and all that, I GET IT, im just saying the conclusion I got to by just reading it. I believe its the EASIEST and SIMPLEST way to read the bible.
The one thing I do have (atleast I hope lol) locked in on eschatology is PREMILLENNIALISM. Thats one thing where I cant budge from that anymore. The claim that Rev 20:11ff is the second coming is crazy to me, because by that point the earth is destroyed and resurrection would be AFTER teh earth is destroyed -> God would destroy the righteous with the wicked which is NOT how He operates!
The last trump as the voice of God called last shout of God on the last day. Just as at Jericho and then comes total destruction as the new heaven and earth appear.
I would agree with the conclusion of Revelation 11:15 .It is supported by the use of the phrase "last day" or the "day of Christ" or the "Lord's day" in Revelation
The" last days" or "last times" began at Pentecost, the time or reformation. Acts 2:16-18, 1 Peter 1:20, 1 John 2:18
Six times in John the Holy Spirit uses the "last day" to represent the second resurrection and judgement for the unbeliever as one work in the twinkling of the eye or a thief in the night. It is also used in Job in the same way
John 12:48 He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken,
the same shall judge him in the last day
Lazarus being raised was used to represent the first resurrection when we first believed we passed from death to new life. The first resurrection
John 11:24 Martha saith unto him, I know that
he shall rise again in the
resurrection at the last day.
John 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and
I will raise him up at the last day
The Amil position at least today works the best for reconciling the signified language of Christ, the language of parables or the language by which he gives us ears to hear and therefore understand the mysteries of God, hidden from natural man
Matthew 13:34All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in
parables; and
without a
parable spake he not unto them:
Mark 4:11And he said unto them, Unto
you it is given to know the "mystery of the kingdom of God": but
unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables:And he said unto them,
He that hath ears to hear, let him hear. And when he was alone, they that were about him with the twelve asked of him the parable. That seeing
they may see, and
not perceive; and
hearing they may hear,
and not understand; lest at any time
they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.
I have a personal bias to parables. It seem when I began the reading the Bible things were jumping off the page and needed to be interpreted. Some things did not compare ("close beside)"to others as parables it does take some work to coin a biblical phrase "to search for silver or gold or the pearl of great price". The price of our salvation .
Strongs lexicon 3850 parabolḗ (from
3844 /pará,
"close beside", with" and
906 /bállō,
"to cast")
And understand that many I have spoken with would seem to fear spiritualizing the word spiritual words of God. But from my perspective if we compare the spiritual understanding to the spiritual unseen understanding or called faith to faith.
What should we fear looking into the mysteries if it is His design ?