Evolution

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 29, 2021
52
1
8
I have reported you for your sarcasm and attacking the person not the subject. That is what I am talking about.
Congratulations for getting that idiot banned because everyone knows that is the best way to 100% prove you're right.
 
May 22, 2020
2,382
358
83
Moderators: do feel free to not publish this post if you feel it would cause unwanted negative responses from CC membership :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

A simple thought experiment for those who believe the Earth is of the order of 5,000 years old and who do not believe in evolution:

If the story of Adam and Eve is literally true, then when only Adam and Eve existed there could have been a maximum of 4 different human eye colours.
This would be the case if the 4 human eyes (Adam had two, Eve had two) were all different colours.
However, there are now more than 25 human eye colours.

Many people who do not believe in evolution hold this position because they reason that a living thing could not possibly have some feature that its ancestors did not have - e.g. how could a sea creature evolve into a bird over millions of years...
If you take this position, how do you explain the development of human eye colours, as described above?
Eye color is a pittance of relativity. In any event it is an adaptation design....by God. Who says He could not have designed such features and others we have yet to experience?
 
May 22, 2020
2,382
358
83
Moderators: do feel free to not publish this post if you feel it would cause unwanted negative responses from CC membership :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

A simple thought experiment for those who believe the Earth is of the order of 5,000 years old and who do not believe in evolution:

If the story of Adam and Eve is literally true, then when only Adam and Eve existed there could have been a maximum of 4 different human eye colours.
This would be the case if the 4 human eyes (Adam had two, Eve had two) were all different colours.
However, there are now more than 25 human eye colours.

Many people who do not believe in evolution hold this position because they reason that a living thing could not possibly have some feature that its ancestors did not have - e.g. how could a sea creature evolve into a bird over millions of years...
If you take this position, how do you explain the development of human eye colours, as described above?

How about getting serious concerning the topic you really wish to explore...evolution...and allow these two items in for review;

1) Prove the .....Cambrian explosion conclusion...... is in error

2) Please find and present the hybrids of species changed.

Evolution is a myth.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,112
4,374
113
Congratulations for getting that idiot banned because everyone knows that is the best way to 100% prove you're right.
he got himself banned LOL we had nothing to do with it. kind of evolved into that out of nothing LOl.
 
Nov 29, 2021
52
1
8
he got himself banned LOL we had nothing to do with it. kind of evolved into that out of nothing LOl.
I take it you mean the royal we.
None the less you deserve a huge pat on the back because we can't have disenting opinions being bandied about like it's a free country and you're capable of an honest exchage of ideas. Right?
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,112
4,374
113
I take it you mean the royal we.
None the less you deserve a huge pat on the back because we can't have disenting opinions being bandied about like it's a free country and you're capable of an honest exchange of ideas. Right?
No had nothing to do with this person being banned :) I am just stating the facts those who are banned do it to themselves. We did not control the person's actions. CC has and always will be long-suffering with atheists, agnostics, JW, etc... Many who were banned because of things they said have come back and are here today. Yes, we are a free country and this, for the most part, is a free CHAT site who makes the rules. :)
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,465
6,722
113
Our Beloved Savior was "banned" by many, most, of the Jews.
 
O

Oblio

Guest
I'll believe anything other than what this world tells me.
Moderators: do feel free to not publish this post if you feel it would cause unwanted negative responses from CC membership :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

A simple thought experiment for those who believe the Earth is of the order of 5,000 years old and who do not believe in evolution:

If the story of Adam and Eve is literally true, then when only Adam and Eve existed there could have been a maximum of 4 different human eye colours.
This would be the case if the 4 human eyes (Adam had two, Eve had two) were all different colours.
However, there are now more than 25 human eye colours.

Many people who do not believe in evolution hold this position because they reason that a living thing could not possibly have some feature that its ancestors did not have - e.g. how could a sea creature evolve into a bird over millions of years...
If you take this position, how do you explain the development of human eye colours, as described above?
You have no idea why I believe what I believe...however, I am convince that you believe what you believe for one reason...you have been deceived!
 
Nov 29, 2021
52
1
8
No had nothing to do with this person being banned :) I am just stating the facts those who are banned do it to themselves. We did not control the person's actions.
Good to hear from someone who knows the facts. What actions were those exactly out of interest?
 
O

Oblio

Guest
Well, this is how I would like us to be...
You may disagree with me, but I'll defend your right to disagree with me. And...
I think, that if we all try, we can disagree without being disagreeable.
Or am I just a dreamer?
 
Nov 29, 2021
52
1
8
Well, this is how I would like us to be...
You may disagree with me, but I'll defend your right to disagree with me. And...
I think, that if we all try, we can disagree without being disagreeable.
Or am I just a dreamer?
Yes, you are a dreamer. It's fundamentally impossible to disagree with someone without being disagreeable in the same way as it's impossible to be disagreeable without disagreeing with someone. All that is required is for everyone to have broad enough shoulders to bear that burden.
 
O

Oblio

Guest
Your attitude is clear to me.
 
May 22, 2020
2,382
358
83
Well, this is how I would like us to be...
You may disagree with me, but I'll defend your right to disagree with me. And...
I think, that if we all try, we can disagree without being disagreeable.
Or am I just a dreamer?

with the radical left philosophy...you dream big.:rolleyes:
 
O

Oblio

Guest
Radical left...I must be radical to still be upset over the election being stolen from President Trump.
I guess I must need to explain, "Disagreeing without being disagreeable." You see, when I said disagreeable, I wasn't talking about a difference of opinion, I was talking about having an unpleasant attitude. Capice?
 
May 22, 2020
2,382
358
83
Radical left...I must be radical to still be upset over the election being stolen from President Trump.
I guess I must need to explain, "Disagreeing without being disagreeable." You see, when I said disagreeable, I wasn't talking about a difference of opinion, I was talking about having an unpleasant attitude. Capice?

You are getting there....arguing is an attitude...capice?

Prayerfully/Hopefully we get Trump back.
 
O

Oblio

Guest
And I'm thinking that you are purposely being difficult to get along with...you have no idea where I am.
I am not where you are...give God the glory for that!
 
May 22, 2020
2,382
358
83
And I'm thinking that you are purposely being difficult to get along with...you have no idea where I am.
I am not where you are...give God the glory for that!

I have no need to know where u are ...just to understand your verbiage. I give God all glory to help me discern your interest.
 

CS1

Well-known member
May 23, 2012
13,112
4,374
113
Good to hear from someone who knows the facts. What actions were those exactly out of interest?
I cannot speak about a past member banned or not banned. You will have to PM Admin and ask them.