Peter brought the word of God (not Peter' word) it as
it is written with the word
it representing the source of Christian faith.
It advised men what to do . It was not the advice of Peter but the advice freely given to Peter just as
it is given to every person who has flesh
Yes merely willed by the will of God that worked in Peter as he does in all believers to both will and perform the good pleasure of God. The Bible calls it a imputed righteousness . It one of those first things first .God moves us we do not move Him .So why murmur God promise us her will not forget the good works we worked with Him .If its a pride issue and a person wants some glory drop it before it drops the person
For it is
God which worketh in you
both to will and t
o do of his good pleasure. Do all things
without murmurings ………...
(I want recognition to be venerated ) and disputings
hilipians 2:13-14
Are you hoping to be found which a righteousness of your own self and plan to finish it in Purgatory for a unknow amount of time or severity of punishment?
Christ did not provide a unknown remnant of grace but all that was needed to fulfil the just demands of His law. Why do Catholics do despite to the Spirit of grace by making it a unknown remnant??
2 Peter 1:19-21 King James Version (KJV) We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts: Knowing
this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
(of Peter) For the prophecy came not in old time by the
will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were
moved "by the Holy Ghost".
(not moved by the will of Peter)
In Job 23 we are informed God who is not a man as us is of one mind and always does whatsoever His soul desires For it is God who performs that in which he appoints to us. Only he can make our heart soft. When Peter hardened his own hard and blasphemed the Son of Man Jesus in Mathew 16. he was forgiven .If he would of did that today we could not call him a brother in Christ. God does not forgive when men blaspheme the unseen Holy Place as if it was a must that we have men the temporal seen teach us.
What do you say Wansvic is it a must that we have men seen to teach us ? Some might call that Apostolic succession as a law of the fathers. where did that tradition come from seeing it make the word of God without effect.
Peter does not get accredited for Christ working in Him in Acts 2 .It was Christ preaching the gospel through the living abiding word We preach Christ not our own selves or Peters.