I think it's quite simple:
If God is love, according to scripture, then the literalist concept of hell is alien to that, and an aberration. Because it is not love
Thus, those who believe in such a literalist idea are forced to re-interpret what love is - a fools errand!
It's interesting that they would rather sacrifice love and that is easier for them to do, point noted - they have missed the point
Instead, to conceive that divine justice in in accordance with love, is enough...that is all we need to know
Literal understandings of scripture, while appearing correct could be all wrong - and they were the authors best guess
We are guided by a Spirit that gives us better information
If God is love, according to scripture, then the literalist concept of hell is alien to that, and an aberration. Because it is not love
Thus, those who believe in such a literalist idea are forced to re-interpret what love is - a fools errand!
It's interesting that they would rather sacrifice love and that is easier for them to do, point noted - they have missed the point
Instead, to conceive that divine justice in in accordance with love, is enough...that is all we need to know
Literal understandings of scripture, while appearing correct could be all wrong - and they were the authors best guess
We are guided by a Spirit that gives us better information
You use the word "love" to mean tolerance for evil, no justice and no consequences for evil on judgment day.
Try defining love in the biblical way, not what society paints as love, garbage like tolerance, being "nice" and "accepting" of everything and everyone. That is NOT love.
The same God who is "love" is also the one who killed the entire earth except for Noah and his family.
Try again.