Quran Contradictions
- Thread starter Anna_Marie
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Muslims argue that Jesus is not the son of God because Allah has no son. No problem because Allah is not God. Allah has 3 daughters who also became idols.
https://www.chick.com/products/tract?stk=42&ue=d
https://www.chick.com/products/tract?stk=42&ue=d
-
1
- Show all
Good afternoon, Tinkerbell.
You appear to be concerned more with the status of the aḥādīth than with the Qur’an.
The aḥādīth are collection of traditions containing sayings of the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) which – with accounts of his daily practice (the Sunna) – constitute a major source of guidance for Muslims, apart from the Qur’an.
The Prophet gave orders that no aḥādīth were to be written down while he lived (he did not want his own words to be mistaken for those of Allāh (subḥānahu ūta'āla), as revealed in the Qur’an.
The Muslim Community is divided as to the veracity of the aḥādīth.
At one extreme are the Qur’anists; folk who consider all aḥādīth to be unreliable; worthy only of outright rejection. At the opposite extreme are those who claim that to doubt the authenticity of even a single ḥādīth is to place oneself outside the fold of Islam.
The majority of Muslims appear to float somewhere in between.
Dr. Mohammad Hashim Kamail writes:
‘Muslim jurists and ulama have developed elaborate methodologies for the authentication of hadith with the purpose precisely to enhance the scope of scientific objectivity in their conclusions. This they have done in full awareness that in no other branch of Islamic learning has there been as much distortion and forgery as in hadith.’ (‘A Textbook of Ḥādīth Studies’; my emphasis).
There was extensive forgery of aḥādīth in the early decades of Islam, following the murder of Uthman – the third caliph. According to Dr. Kamil, the killing of Uthman ‘dealt a heavy blow to the unity of the umma’, resulting in ‘the emergence of serious political differences and partisan groups such as Shia, Kharijites and Mutazila.’
An ḥādīth that stands in conflict with the Quran – such that no reasonable compromise or interpretation can reconcile the two; or that conflicts with the accepted behaviour of the Prophet, or with another ḥādīth; or that conflicts with human experience, or with the natural sciences must be treated with caution.
I repeat:
The Arabic for a virgin (or maiden) is ‘al-adra’.
The Qur’an states – quite clearly – that, in the Garden, men and women shall be married to ‘fair ones having beautiful eyes’ (‘wazawwajnāhum biḥūrin ʿīnin.’)
Peace and Blessings.
You appear to be concerned more with the status of the aḥādīth than with the Qur’an.
The aḥādīth are collection of traditions containing sayings of the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) which – with accounts of his daily practice (the Sunna) – constitute a major source of guidance for Muslims, apart from the Qur’an.
The Prophet gave orders that no aḥādīth were to be written down while he lived (he did not want his own words to be mistaken for those of Allāh (subḥānahu ūta'āla), as revealed in the Qur’an.
The Muslim Community is divided as to the veracity of the aḥādīth.
At one extreme are the Qur’anists; folk who consider all aḥādīth to be unreliable; worthy only of outright rejection. At the opposite extreme are those who claim that to doubt the authenticity of even a single ḥādīth is to place oneself outside the fold of Islam.
The majority of Muslims appear to float somewhere in between.
Dr. Mohammad Hashim Kamail writes:
‘Muslim jurists and ulama have developed elaborate methodologies for the authentication of hadith with the purpose precisely to enhance the scope of scientific objectivity in their conclusions. This they have done in full awareness that in no other branch of Islamic learning has there been as much distortion and forgery as in hadith.’ (‘A Textbook of Ḥādīth Studies’; my emphasis).
There was extensive forgery of aḥādīth in the early decades of Islam, following the murder of Uthman – the third caliph. According to Dr. Kamil, the killing of Uthman ‘dealt a heavy blow to the unity of the umma’, resulting in ‘the emergence of serious political differences and partisan groups such as Shia, Kharijites and Mutazila.’
An ḥādīth that stands in conflict with the Quran – such that no reasonable compromise or interpretation can reconcile the two; or that conflicts with the accepted behaviour of the Prophet, or with another ḥādīth; or that conflicts with human experience, or with the natural sciences must be treated with caution.
I repeat:
The Arabic for a virgin (or maiden) is ‘al-adra’.
The Qur’an states – quite clearly – that, in the Garden, men and women shall be married to ‘fair ones having beautiful eyes’ (‘wazawwajnāhum biḥūrin ʿīnin.’)
Peace and Blessings.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
Not entirely correct, but partly. The quran is a rip-off of the bible, or the torah and talmud. All the abrahamic religions are based on the same texts, so quran is just a shortened version, like a pamflet of the real boo, and modified somewhat. And yes, operated to gain political power, and rrule the world. A pervertion of the good book, and therefore blasphemic.
-
1
- Show all
You make it sound as if Islam is considerate and beneficial to women as it is to men. But how then is there such a record of violence against women in Islam? Women being punished for getting raped, women being treated like slaves, women being killed by their own families for being abused by other men, and the sick, barbaric practice of female genital mutilation? In Christian countries, women are treated humanely and such practices banned. But it seems the inhumane treatment of women continues in many of the countries where Islam is the predominant religion. Why is this, if the Qur'an treats both men and women fairly?
