i use esv. james white said its a great translation, very good for original languages and still good to read.
Jesus bless all you
Jesus bless all you
If the scripture contradicts. You probably have the incorrect words. Which is why you dig deeper.In order for Scripture to interpret itself, don't you have to have the correct words? I never want to be the determining factor on which words are correct and which are not.
Those who choose KJV, why that one?
Popularity?
Education in vocabulary?
If the scripture contradicts. You probably have the incorrect words. Which is why you dig deeper.
I am not getting into the KJV is perfect nonsense with you. The kjv is just as flawed as the rest of the top of the line bibles.. Whether you like that fact or not does not matter.
Because consensus is what determines truth. If that was the determiner then the plastic hair guy that comes on the tv with the 10,000 attendees that says stuff like, best life now, and send him a pile of money and Jesus will deposit that much into your account and it will draw heaven interest and you can buy a Audi R8 next year, and I follow Jesus that's why I drive a Rolls Royce would be the guy espousing truth. Not the guy saying take up your cross daily.I voted for KING JIMMY. Glad to see its winning
I think this is proof that the KJV is a divinely inspired translation? Why else would it win this vote, HUH? HUH?!? Cant explain that away can you? GOTCHA!
Im just joking. But seriously KJV!
I've always used the NIV and NLT, but have started getting into the ESV. I find it hard to settle on one main translation (I know the advice is ususally to have one for devotional and reading, and refer to others). So I'm curious, what do you use and why? Have you changed translation, and why? Please note I'm not interested in a debate about translations, I think they're all good.
Your first mistake.
Ask yourself a question;....why have most of the new translations occurred since 1960?
Correlate that question with the fact that the 1960's brought about a whole new, new age religion interpretation of scriptures (baptism not necessary, OSAS, super grace,etc) and if one compares the changes with each successive edition a pattern emerges. Study that pattern carefully. I fear that..."great deceptions"..... are apparent.
For your edification.
Either you make that determination, or you trust someone else to do it for you. Those are the only options.In order for Scripture to interpret itself, don't you have to have the correct words? I never want to be the determining factor on which words are correct and which are not.
Your first mistake.
Ask yourself a question;....why have most of the new translations occurred since 1960?
Correlate that question with the fact that the 1960's brought about a whole new, new age religion interpretation of scriptures (baptism not necessary, OSAS, super grace,etc) and if one compares the changes with each successive edition a pattern emerges. Study that pattern carefully. I fear that..."great deceptions"..... are apparent.
For your edification.
No, it started when Adam took a bite of the forbidden fruit.The spiral downward of society started to occur in 1881, the beginning of the Laodicean Church Age.
What I mean is, when you come to a passage and the different versions vary, how do you decide which is right? Thanks.
Jumping in here...Just curious, how do you decide which one to go with?
No, it started when Adam took a bite of the forbidden fruit.
This will help.....also, don't forget prayer....:
Take the Bible literally wherever possible. If typical, figurative or symbolic language is used then we must look for a literal interpretation it intends to convey.
Look for scripture which interprets scripture.
Do not spiritualize the Bible.
All of that and I just plain love it. I think it is beautiful and find it easy to understand. All my memory work from youth onward was done with it.
No, it started when Adam took a bite of the forbidden fruit.