Why I'm getting the vaccine.
- Thread starter Gideon300
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You people don't want evidence. The evidence is all around and you deny it. But for those who will read your comment.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-08-19-phds-more-vaccine-hesitant-than-anyone-else.html
"The most educated people in the world are the least likely to get “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), a new study has found."
I advise you listen to the person who invented the mRNA technology. This injection will likely cause many women to miscarry and/or become sterile. I can't say that's bad news. People foolish enough to trust the government probably should not be producing offspring.
https://www.theburningplatform.com/...accumulate-in-high-concentrations-in-ovaries/
.
Okay...
Let me explain this...
If someone asks you to prove something using a study... you shouldn't use a overtly partisan publication... because it is instantly contested as having a self interest just like you do...(saying anything that you want to believe but not really having true, scientific proof. Merely a whitewashed proof you want to accept masquerading as true)
So....
Try again with a truly independent source this time.
So you will need to remain completely silent on the topic, then. Because any source still supporting the vax is totally partisan. I look forward to hearing from your silence, or reading further "evidence" exposing your hypocrisy in the matter.
Yes, I think autopsies of vaccinated people will be the best evidence one way or the other, just like the CTE studies done on the NFL.
Second, even if only ten percent of people on this planet don't get the vaccine that is still 700 million, more than enough to repopulate so people need to chill out, we are conducting an experiment that will have long ranging benefits for humanity.
I did listen to him...(the Hungarian woman who invented the mRNA technology I don't know at all)
But the research scientist who has been studying coronavirus for the past 20+ years at Vanderbilt University and lead on the vaccine team for Moderna is right here in Nashville TN at Vanderbilt University....
Nice Christian man...very good and knowledgeable about his field. He was going absolutely broke as all coronavirus research was dried up for a while before the pandemic...now he is busy as a beaver and don't know when he will ever get a vacation.
I'm not the one who says sources should be limited to non-partisan publications, as on this matter, they all are. The science is too obvious. Either the publication cannot recommend an experimental gene therapy (as it is bad science and medicine), or they're shilling for Bill Gates. There is no middle ground.
This incidentally is the reason for the censorship. Public debate on the matter would disclose the lack of science being employed by the vaccine promotors.
There are actually truly neutral magazines and publications that discuss the merits and demerits of the Vaccines.
But they are not for those who have less than a collegiate vocabulary...most of the grammar is outside the norm and then the vocabulary is beyond google as well...gotta get a special dictionary.
Now I've (well my wife has) had one of these dictionaries for years... because she works in research. Probably not going to be easy to get one these days.
But there are truly neutral publications that discuss these things.
Research Science is a field where normal is slightly different. Larceny of intellectual property is broadly accepted and normal but purgury will instantly make you an ostracized leper.
I disagree, and stand by my statement.
Either the publication cannot recommend an experimental gene therapy (as it is bad science and medicine), or they're shilling for Bill Gates. There is no middle ground.
Gene therapies are extremely experimental and not standardized medicine for anyone except terminally ill patients.
There is a laundry list of side effects that no one will authorize for broad use...
But if you are referencing the mRNA vaccines as "gene therapy"....then you are demonstrating something that discredits your position...please stop...I want a good opponent when debating. Not someone who hands me the trophy and walks away shouting about how he was robbed.
Oh?
I didn't think that you were having an emotional discussion. My apologies... when you respond with ad hominem attacks...I didn't mean to hurt your feelings.
My feelings lay inside of a coffin on the mantle as they all had died some time ago and we're just cluttering up the place.
I'm ceasing interactions with him. Shills get paid by the post, and he clearly needs to refer to dishonest, partisan publications to maintain his illusion that the mRNA vaccines are not gene therapy.
I can't say it's all that impressive. Anyone can attend a university. The School of Hard Knocks is much more impressive and useful.
.