It would be hard to make a case for any of these extreme groups given we are to be following Christ.
The post I made a few ticks back that shared a brief history of Quantrill and his raiders. It's pencil images that were used back in Civil War news times to deliver reporting with a visual attachment to the news.
Here's another.
Thank you Lilly...
I'm just wondering what does the Civil War have to do with being a white republican and am I a raciest now because of my race (which I left put on purpose Jewish; yet still white and republican) yet we are back in the 1800's.... So what about the 1800's.... My people have some history to....lol...
Does it matter?Who is "your people" ??? The white republicans? Or the Israelis?
This is how the left currently defines racism... and it's all based on Neo-Marxist Conflict Theory.
It wasn't my idea.
...
So if Lincoln was a white Supremesist, why did he fight to free the black slaves? If I am not mistaken that is what the Emancipation Proclimation is, is that white people could no longer own slaves and the black people were given the same rights and libertys as the whites.
Revisionist History & Problem Solving
Revisionist history isn't a threat which is exclusive to the southern states,
and the driving forces behind revisionism aren't black Americans.
The problems run deeper than these sophomoric and racially charged polemics.
Propagating Division?
I truly can't understand why anyone on a Christian forum would choose an avatar of a man like Quantrill -
a figure well documented as a thief and cattle rustler, slave hunter, outlaw, and murderer.
Quantrill is a figure whom, at the very BEST, is controversial, divisive, sometimes criminal, and has absolutely nothing to do with Christ.
Conclusion
1. There are real problems in the world, and in the U.S... agreed.
2. However, we really can't solve problems by completely misidentifying the actual problems, digging our heals into a few symptoms, dividing the body of Christ along arbitrary lines, and then fighting endlessly with everyone in sight.
..
The post I made a few ticks back that shared a brief history of Quantrill and his raiders. It's pencil images that were used back in Civil War news times to deliver reporting with a visual attachment to the news.
Here's another.
It would be hard to make a case for any of these extreme groups given we are to be following Christ.
So Lilly, what do you think about him? ( The real Quantrill. I mean)
She doesn't know what to think about the real Quantrill because she has encountered some real history about Quantrill that she never heard. She never heard it because she just believed, like everyone else, the bull they had been feeding her.
Quantrill
Hey Quantrill, So what do you find positive in a man such as "Quantrill"...
I choose it because I know the true history of Quantrill and not your perverted views which are just you coughing up the smoke they have been blowing up your back side.
Shows your ignorance of history.
Do yourself a favor and do your own research.
Quantrill
I'm ignorant of history?
Maybe I am.
So are you making the claims that:
a) Quantrill's group did NOT surround Lawrence, burn it down, and murder the people there?
b) Quantrill did NOT work as a bounty hunter, capturing escaped slaves?
c) Quantrill was NEVER a cattle rustler, or outlaw, and he never broke any laws?
...
I get it, thanks for explaining.
So we can conclude liberals/democrats are communists lol.
Yes they did destroy Lawrence Kansas. If you have read this thread completely you will see why they did. Have you? What say you to that?
Capturing slaves was in line with the Constitution. Quantrill was supporting the Constitution.
Everyone fighting for the South was considered outlaws.
Quantrill
'positive'....such a queer word. Sort of like 'guys'.
Quantrill and the men that rode with him, stood up against overwhelming odds for the South and her people. When he was given no quarter, he gave no quarter. And he expected no quarter in return.
Quantrill