I would say u r a 5 . Definitely not ugly but , nothing special looks wise . I hope u find happiness and , that u bring happiness to your other half .I am not photogenic, but here goes.
I would say u r a 5 . Definitely not ugly but , nothing special looks wise . I hope u find happiness and , that u bring happiness to your other half .I am not photogenic, but here goes.
This raises a curious question - at what number on the scale does someone "classify" as 'ugly'?I would say u r a 5 . Definitely not ugly but , nothing special looks wise . I hope u find happiness and , that u bring happiness to your other half .
Minus 1This raises a curious question - at what number on the scale does someone "classify" as 'ugly'?
I've never seen a minus 1 in looks , but I've met a few minus 1 personalitiesMinus 1![]()
Yes, by many - including, occasionally, me. =^.^=I wonder if we're being trolled at this point.
This raises a curious question - at what number on the scale does someone "classify" as 'ugly'?
I suppose that should make sense - because, any number on a scale of attractiveness should/would [still] be attractive to some degree.Minus 1![]()
Will you still think this way after/if/when your wife of the future gets into the habit of giving everything of yours away to people she thinks need it more...???About that second one...
I remember a guy talking about growing up in the 30's. He said he and his brother learned real fast to never get too attached to any particular pair of pants. If their mother decided some neighbor's boy needed them more, they would soon see the neighbor's boy wearing them.
To me, THAT is a beautiful woman.
Only someone who knows nothing about me would ask a question like that. And though I don't talk much about it, many here have born witness of me in this regard multiple times. Perhaps you didn't happen to read the relevant threads.Will you still think this way after/if/when your wife of the future gets into the habit of giving everything of yours away to people she thinks need it more...???
Hmm... I think I should put a clarification on that reply I made last night.Will you still think this way after/if/when your wife of the future gets into the habit of giving everything of yours away to people she thinks need it more...???
Sounds generally reasonable to me. I love #3 and #4, especially. I married someone, thinking that some things would change with time, but they never did. In fact, some of the things I intentionally overlooked only became magnified with time (as mom warned me!). My former wife did a great job of "playing church." She really viewed it as much more of a social club, so we were diametrically opposed on that point. Please don't ever compromise with anyone when it regards faith in Jesus Christ and their being born again in the blood of Jesus (doesn't sound as if you will!).I am a very blunt and brutally honest person, I am not into bar scenes, and most Christian singles groups I have gone to do not have any viable prospects(forgive the language). I have been spending most of my time pursuing women on the web, which is also unfruitful. I remember one pastor saying jokingly that, “women are like parking spots, all the good ones are taken and the rest are handicapped.”
Ironically, I think because I have not had a real relationship with any woman, I find myself often dumbfounded by the question, “what are you looking for?”
I would say that first and foremost is a woman that is a believer, but my date from hell was also a woman who professed to be that, so I know that is a slippery slope and I give people time and opportunity to reveal their true nature.
If I could select my mate:
1. Christian (a woman sound in the true faith of traditional Protestant theology, to keep me grounded.)
2. Beautiful (I do not need a model or movie star, but I couldn’t stand to settle for low hanging fruit, or a starter wife. Better for us both to remain unmarried)
3. I believe there is wisdom in the words, “Do not marry someone you think you can fix,” and this is more for her than for me, I can surprisingly tolerate a lot from growing up with six siblings and some years in the military, but I would rather have someone who gets on me for smoking or other poor hygiene than someone who is afraid to be an unruly wife or especially and apathetic wife.
4. I would like someone who gets along better with my family than I do.
5. I love children, and I want at least 3. I was considering adopting embryos, but I would prefer all mine or none mine.
6. Raising children in a hybrid church. I come from a reformed evangelical background, I was very much in love with a girl who was Roman Catholic, and I was going to fight tooth and nail to raise our children Anglican, but God made that decision for me.
7. I believe in a shared responsibility of household duties, like changing diapers, cleaning, cooking, and washing dishes, but she would have to run point on that with me in a support capacity.
8. Fire and ice, on most topics I will be ice, but I do love passionate women.
I am sure I will think of more, but is this a reasonable series of expectations?
Be honest?
I'll grant you that I had never looked up the definition of "starter wife," but for many years I and my peers seem to have understood the phrase to mean that first marriage one had, whereby you learned the ropes and learned all the hard lessons...in preparation for and for the benefit of the second, more sustainable marriage. It was a tongue-in-cheek phrase as a way of saying that all the kinks got worked out of both parties during the first marriage, such that the second marriage ended up being the beneficiary.I wondered this too. So, yesterday after I seen this post I looked it up. I read the definition on a few sites as well as stories from those who have gone through this. I found this particular one to be very sad and it made me thankful to be single lol...
View attachment 277608
About that second one...
I remember a guy talking about growing up in the 30's. He said he and his brother learned real fast to never get too attached to any particular pair of pants. If their mother decided some neighbor's boy needed them more, they would soon see the neighbor's boy wearing them.
To me, THAT is a beautiful woman.
Will you still think this way after/if/when your wife of the future gets into the habit of giving everything of yours away to people she thinks need it more...???
Only someone who knows nothing about me would ask a question like that. And though I don't talk much about it, many here have born witness of me in this regard multiple times. Perhaps you didn't happen to read the relevant threads.
Ask many of the kids at church or w*rk about me in this matter.
Or find all the laptops that used to be mine. Or all the audio patch cables that are currently being used in the sound booth, the drum cage, or to connect a kid's guitar to his computer so he can use a laptop as an FX box. Or the bluetooth speakers. Or the flash drives that went home with a music project or program. Or the stacks and stacks of CDs for choir projects (that one is in the past, thanks to youtube and the prevalence of smartphones.) Or the mints at the church welcome center. I buy some things (mints, flash drives, patch cables, etc) in bulk just so it will be feasible to do such things.
Actually just tonight I picked up six more flash drives and eight bags of soft mints for dirt cheap. Yay for the auction house!
I'm not big on virtue signaling so I don't talk about this much. But (censored) (expurgated) my (redacted) if I'm going to let someone cast aspersions on my character in this area without saying anything at all.
First of all, how did a comment made about another person's mother having a heart of gold with a practical measure of motivation suddenly turn into all-about-you?Hmm... I think I should put a clarification on that reply I made last night.
If some newbie had rolled up and said that, I would have said something like "Haha! It would probably be the other way around. I'd be making HER nervous."
If one of my friends, who knows me, said that, I would know they were joking and I would return the joke. Like if seoul said it, I'd threaten to give Winston away to a needy child.
But YOU... You seem to enjoy throwing shade, as the kids say. I keep getting the impression that you take an almost gleeful delight in finding ways to make people look bad. Of course I have never met you in person, so I don't know for sure. Probably better so. But that is the impression I keep getting.
It gets annoying. So last night my annoyance runneth over.
Only, reverse the numbers on the chart - right?Why not use one of those emoji pain chart things like at the doctor's office instead. Since numbers seem to be confusing.![]()
.....when I write a post that consists of a single italicized sentence - it often means I am putting something forth as an off-the-cuff and/or tongue-in-cheek type of question/statement? Yes, I also do that when making a [more serious] food-for-thought point/suggestion - intended to get the reader to think; however, probably more times than not I do it to be amusing/funny.
My using italics for the whole sentence means that it is intended for some kind of emphasis. If I were speaking to you in person, "normal text" would be "normal talking" while italicized text would be saying something in a way that indicates an intent of humor, sarcasm, etc. - whether being serious or funny, the italicized text is a "mimic" of what would be the style of speaking - apart from what is being said. Which is why it may be used in various ways to emphasize different things. You have to rely on other 'clues' to determine the full picture. After all, there are only so many available methods to use... (bold, italics, etc.)
The three question marks instead of just one usually indicates a 'pointed' approach to the question - like, 'give me a real answer'. Sometimes, it indicates an 'are you serious' kind of reply to a hard-to-believe or otherwise questionable statement.
In that case we revert to the first plan I listed:First of all, how did a comment made about another person's mother having a heart of gold with a practical measure of motivation suddenly turn into all-about-you?
How could you possibly come up with the "cast aspersions on my character" impression if your motives for post #3 were really actually pure-at-heart?????
How did anything that you do or have done come into this from a mere "praising" of a woman who you thought was 'beautiful' because of her actions???
This whole idea never entered my mind while writing post #269.
Second - how long have you been reading my posts and have not yet figured out that when I write a post that consists of a single italicized sentence - it often means I am putting something forth as an off-the-cuff and/or tongue-in-cheek type of question/statement? Yes, I also do that when making a [more serious] food-for-thought point/suggestion - intended to get the reader to think; however, probably more times than not I do it to be amusing/funny.
My using italics for the whole sentence means that it is intended for some kind of emphasis. If I were speaking to you in person, "normal text" would be "normal talking" while italicized text would be saying something in a way that indicates an intent of humor, sarcasm, etc. - whether being serious or funny, the italicized text is a "mimic" of what would be the style of speaking - apart from what is being said. Which is why it may be used in various ways to emphasize different things. You have to rely on other 'clues' to determine the full picture. After all, there are only so many available methods to use... (bold, italics, etc.)
The three question marks instead of just one usually indicates a 'pointed' approach to the question - like, 'give me a real answer'. Sometimes, it indicates an 'are you serious' kind of reply to a hard-to-believe or otherwise questionable statement.
So, yes - there was a 'serious' component to the question.
However, the question as a whole was intended to also be humorous - based on the idea of a mental picture in the mind of the reader - imagining a wife doing something like that while the husband is saying "No wait! Not that!" about everything she gives away. This was actually the central focus of the post.
Third - when are you going to tear down the wall you have put up between you and me? No matter what I say or how I say it, you always assume it is intended to disparage you. If anything, it is you who are way-too-cynical and prone to "casting aspersions" when the basis for it does not even exist. And, I think maybe you are a bit more into virtue signaling than perhaps you even realize. You are always trying to make yourself look good and others look bad. Some of your remarks in the quotes above sound exactly backwards. From my perspective, it is you who are always looking for ways to try to make me look bad.
From my vantage point, this is what is written on your wall:
"I will never allow myself to become friends with him - no matter what."
If you do not tear down that wall, how are we ever going to be able to be friends?
I think it is great that you try to do what you can to help other folks with computers, etc. - I try to do things like that to help others, too.
But, how did all of that even get into this picture??? What does that have to do with a "praise" comment about another person's mother???
You see - all of this stuff you posted - is only in your mind - it surely never entered mine.
Nothing I said was intended to "cast aspersions on your character" - please try to believe that.
Tell-you-what - when in doubt, just assume that I am trying to be amusing/funny and just not very good at it...![]()