Foreshadowing the baptism into Jesus when/where none get wet with water, yes, I agree.They are foreshadows.
As foreshadows, they certainly make it very clear that saving baptism does not get anyone wet.
Foreshadowing the baptism into Jesus when/where none get wet with water, yes, I agree.They are foreshadows.
Consider the apostles never used the phrase; they consistently used the name.
Matthew 28:19 is easy to understand. Jesus gave a command. The apostles obeyed the command.
Already provided. (Acts 2:38-41, 8:12-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-6, 22:16) You disagreed.Did you ever find any scriptures that clarify exactly what words (if any) were used when they baptized someone in the New Testament?
Already provided. (Acts 2:38-41, 8:12-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-6, 22:16) You disagreed.
"And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord." Acts 22:16
"To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins." Acts 10:43 Those who were informed of this were commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord. (Acts 10:47-48)
Opinion is worthless. If you sincerely wish to know the answer, compile a list of scriptures relevant to the topic and study it out. It's the best way to arrive at the truth.Let me ask you this? What is an acceptable way to get baptized in your opinion? Ideally, what words should be spoken and by whom to have a valid baptism?
Opinion is worthless. If you sincerely wish to know the answer, compile a list of scriptures relevant to the topic and study it out. It's the best way to arrive at the truth.
Jesus said all will be judged by the word, not the opinion of others. (John 12:48)
"God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:" 1 Peter 3
Jesus, did I consider that we are Paramount whenever Jesus is Speaking? He is the Final Authority.Consider the apostles never used the phrase; they consistently used the name.
Matthew 28:19 is easy to understand. Jesus gave a command. The apostles obeyed the command.
The ones who get abused the most here, and the ones who get banned the most here, are the ones looking to get saved.
The ones who should get banned the most here are the ones who have saved them selves, and spent a life time back stabbing people. And attacking people's character when faced with the truth.
Have a great day
you should have been banned a long time agoThat is ridiculous. The rules are in place. Those who are banned are banned for very clear reasons. Some think it is an attack to disagree with them. And that they have the Only Truth. This post that is opinionated is fine. Yet trolls and those suffering from other issues do this. Because one will not agree with them or have provided biblical refuting of their position.
here have a dose of thisThat is ridiculous. The rules are in place. Those who are banned are banned for very clear reasons. Some think it is an attack to disagree with them. And that they have the Only Truth. This post that is opinionated is fine. Yet trolls and those suffering from other issues do this. Because one will not agree with them or have provided biblical refuting of their position.
you should have been banned a long time ago![]()
I think you've insulted me enough don't you.I'm sure many think soCan you name one reason why you would? I'd love to hear what you think. Maybe they missed it.
I am tired and forget, where did you get that from?Personaly i really believe you receive the holy spirit upon belief in the son, but then your baptised by the holy ghost after water baptism![]()
I already showed that "in the name of" refers to by whos authority something is taught or done.Please seriously consider, it's not about mere words. It's about neglecting to use the name of Jesus. A practice that was begun in direct opposition to what the bible clearly teaches.
Being obedient to the gospel requires calling upon the name of Jesus. On the day of Pentecost Peter said whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord will be saved. (Acts 2:21) He goes on to preach Jesus. Peter concludes by telling everyone to be baptized in the name of Jesus for remission of sin. (Acts 2:38) In essence obedience to that command is calling upon the name of the Lord.
Also, note the connection between the name and remission of sin that Peter makes in Acts 10:43. The account concludes with obedience to the command that brings about remission of sin:
"To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins" Acts 10:43
"Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord." Acts 10:47-48
"Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." Acts 4:12
"For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Rom 10:13
How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
How shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?
So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." Rom. 10:14-17
In History Baptism is as Jesus taught. all members of the trinity.If this were true, why isn't baptism administered both ways in the Bible?