See #13,853 to start.
I have and I still don't know what you're driving at! What specifically do you need to understand? Last call. Spell out clearly or we'll forget that 13,853 exists.
See #13,853 to start.
***predestination***Since this is more of a philosophical discussion than theological, why so harsh on Free Will when Compatibilism essentially attempts to reconcile Free Will with Determinism?
Since Free Will and Determinism and Compatibilism are all Philosophical issues with many variations, why so firm a stance on any of them apart from identifying and fully explaining your favored version and acknowledging that you're just going with the flow as in most traditions?
The problem with many of the views here in the forum is that the work from Scripture is lacking in favor of simplistic proof-texting. Moreso these are discussions and arguments from philosophies and theological traditions.
Today is an AI (CoPilot) day for a break in reading or participating in harsh bantering among siblings to whatever degree and it's interesting to see what info it compiles from the minds of men:
Determinism is the philosophical view that all events, including human actions, are causally inevitable. It suggests that everything happens due to prior causes, meaning that free will may be an illusion.
Types of Determinism
There are several types of determinism, each focusing on different aspects of causality:
Determinism is often contrasted with indeterminism, which suggests that some events occur randomly or by chance.
- Causal Determinism – The idea that every event is necessitated by previous events and the laws of nature.
- Logical Determinism – Claims that the truth of future events is already fixed, meaning that the future is predetermined.
- Theological Determinism – Argues that God’s divine will determines all events, including human choices.
- Biological Determinism – Suggests that genetics and biological factors predetermine human behavior.
- Psychological Determinism – States that human actions are determined by past experiences, conditioning, and mental states.
- Economic Determinism – Proposes that economic forces shape human decisions and societal structures.
- Nomological Determinism – Holds that natural laws govern all events, making them inevitable.
- Fatalism – A more extreme version, arguing that no matter what choices people make, their fate is sealed.
Compatibilism is the philosophical view that free will and determinism can coexist without contradiction. It argues that even if all events, including human decisions, are determined by prior causes, people can still make meaningful choices.
Types of Compatibilism
There are several variations of compatibilism, each offering a different way to reconcile free will with determinism:
Each type of compatibilism offers a unique perspective on how free will and determinism interact.
- Classical Compatibilism – Rooted in the ideas of David Hume and Thomas Hobbes, it defines free will as the ability to act without external constraints.
- Modern Compatibilism – Developed by philosophers like Harry Frankfurt, it introduces the concept of higher-order volitions, where people act freely when their desires align with their deeper values.
- Semi-Compatibilism – Proposed by John Martin Fischer, it argues that moral responsibility can exist even if free will does not.
- Theological Compatibilism – Found in Calvinist theology, where God's sovereignty and human responsibility coexist, affirming predestination while maintaining voluntary choices.
Free will is the ability of individuals to make choices that are not entirely determined by external forces, prior causes, or divine predestination. It is a central concept in philosophy, psychology, and theology, often debated in relation to determinism.
Types of Free Will
There are several perspectives on free will, each offering different interpretations:
- Libertarian Free Will – Asserts that human choices are not determined by prior causes, allowing for true autonomy.
- Compatibilist Free Will – Holds that free will and determinism can coexist, meaning choices are voluntary but still influenced by prior causes.
- Theological Free Will – Found in religious traditions, where free will is seen as God-given, allowing individuals to choose faith or reject it.
- Scientific Free Will – Examines free will through neuroscience and psychology, questioning whether human decisions are truly independent.
- Political Free Will – Explores free will in the context of social structures, laws, and personal freedoms.
If one actually thinks about "Sovereign" Grace......There would be no need for the cross. In His Sovereignty ,He could pick and choose at His leisure. No need for the cross. No need for the Word.......Just pick some.Nonsense! God bestows His sovereign grace, mercy and compassion on whom HE WISHES, which aren't all people w/o exception!
Mankind lost its "God-given Free Will" when Adam fell. It's impossible for enslaved sinners with depraved hearts to have a volition that is able to choose contrary to its sinful nature.
***predestination***
Is nothing more than "PREPARED DESTINATION", and has nothing to do with created inside of time human pre-birth whatever anything.
This FUTURE destination has been PREPARED by God according to His plan of salvation that was made before time or creation.
This DESTINATION may or may not be CHOSEN according to the willingness of the hearer of the Gospel truth to enter into the New Covenant of life and peace.
The very nature of the term "predestination" needs to be reviewed and corrected and tightly constrained in terms of semantics.
Today at church, the sermon was from Isaiah 14:3-23. It was about PRIDE and how much God hates this sin. It sure made me look at myself, and I did not like what I saw. Hopefully it will cause me to interact better with those that I may not agree with.
I will not cease to provide my opinion on this site, but perhaps I can do it in a kinder manner!
Yup.If one actually thinks about "Sovereign" Grace......There would be no need for the cross. In His Sovereignty ,He could pick and choose at His leisure. No need for the cross. No need for the Word.......Just pick some.
Judicial/righteous Grace. Only those who Go through HIS CROSS receive Grace(salvation).He graciously(sovereignly) rains on the wicked.
John 3:16
Acts 16:31
Yes, that's your theory, but basic Compatibilism attempts to reconcile Free Will with Determinism, so what is your concept of Compatibilism, and your view of the human will that you used to "choose to repent and believe the gospel"?
Today at church, the sermon was from Isaiah 14:3-23. It was about PRIDE and how much God hates this sin. It sure made me look at myself, and I did not like what I saw. Hopefully it will cause me to interact better with those that I may not agree with.
I will not cease to provide my opinion on this site, but perhaps I can do it in a kinder manner!
His plan is what he said we need to hear about it and then believe and follow.
Yeah we need to choose this partThat sounds pretty simple for some here.
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.””Yes, I see it quoted that the Truth sets us free, which is what I said.
Jesus being the Truth. Of course many here do not believe what Jesus said.
This FUTURE destination has been PREPARED by God according to His plan of salvation that was made before time or creation.
If one actually thinks about "Sovereign" Grace......There would be no need for the cross. In His Sovereignty ,He could pick and choose at His leisure. No need for the cross. No need for the Word.......Just pick some.
Judicial/righteous Grace. Only those who Go through HIS CROSS receive Grace(salvation).He graciously(sovereignly) rains on the wicked.
John 3:16
Acts 16:31
Are you saying you disagree with Kroogz believing he has a better idea than God's plan?Why wouldn't there be any need? The many for whom Christ died wouldn't need to be justified? If so, why not?
Yes, that's your theory, but basic Compatibilism attempts to reconcile Free Will with Determinism, so what is your concept of Compatibilism, and your view of the human will that you used to "choose to repent and believe the gospel"?
Are you saying you disagree with Kroogz believing he has a better idea than God's plan?