So? God would have a warlock write Scripture while he was casting a spell? ... @rogerg just said yes to that.
does that apply to John 11:51..?
or more clearly, Numbers 22-24?
So? God would have a warlock write Scripture while he was casting a spell? ... @rogerg just said yes to that.
As I earlier observed, not at all related to what I posted.Let's just say that it may be tangential. But nevertheless cuts to the heart of the matter now doesn't it?
ANSWER IT!
Please.. Refresh everybody's mind since ... at least myself... I can not recall what you assume it is.
Don't run away now. Answer it.
Overcome your depravity and answer it.
Why is unregenerate man having no free will?
What causes it?
.
What part of "bondage" don't you understand? Or the term "slaves", don't you get? Or the term "enslaved"? Or the term "prisoners"? Or the metaphor "dead" that you can't understand? If you don't know by now, after all my posts and Magneata's -- all filled with numerous supporting biblical texts -- why "freewill" is not biblically and logically possible, then you'll never understand. And isn't the "will" a card-carrying faculties member? And aren't all man's faculties corrupt?
And then you shamelessly put your ignorance on display by asking "What causes it"? How 'bout this novel idea: DEATH because when that arrives it renders mankind helplessly crippled so that NONE of the faculties are able to function the way God originally intended, since none of them are free FROM corruption. In other words, man is TOTALLY UNDONE -- kinda like the prophet exclaimed when he got a brief glimpse of someone so VERY UNLIKE himself!
Well...I know Pharaoh's heart was hardened; but do you have chapter and verse pertaining to his Hebrew slaves?
Yes. As God tells us if we read His word and put what he tells us into proper context.sad, sad, sad.
You cannot even see how this view of fallen human nature you keep declaring, devoid of any ability to respond to Truth,
this Augustinian view of man's fallen nature,
makes God responsible for all evil since He is responsible for this fallen nature and all sin past, present and future.
Is He not the designer of how man is in this fallen state according to your interpretation of those out of context verses?
Can you accept that in your view God made man born a slave to sin and therefore bears the responsibility for all of man's actions?
It should be obvious that I am producing only DESTRUCTIVE criticism.constructive criticism of what I wrote.
So you want an "intelligent, coherent reply" to your unintelligible incoherent Calvinite doctrine do you?After you're read my 5934, I'm still waiting for an intelligent, coherent reply to the problem that exists between man-centered FWT and Prayer! Perhaps you missed my 5554 I posted three days ago? Why don't you take your best personal shot at that incongruity?
But FWT does not reflect the gospel of Christ. It is totally man-centered, since God's will is SUBSERVIENT to man's. God is reduced to a hand-wringing, brow-sweating, cosmic crystal ball gazer whose only role in an individual's salvation is to observe and react to man's choices. God isn't running the universe; the inmates in the asylum are!
In fact, in FWT God isn't even truly omniscient since He has to learn through his crystal ball gazing what man is going to do BEFORE he reacts.
Not at all related to what I said.
You don't get it...if they didn't believe it would work, they wouldn't have looked. So they must have believed it would work.
Paul was telling the Jews that it was by faith all through Romans.
The Israelites never really exercised faith they were were driven by works of the law.
Your trying to tell me that the Jews actually had faith?
What is this latest Calvinite raving nuttery?Also, while I think of it, all freewillers, I presented another huge problem between the man-centered FTW and unregenerate man's "freewill" choice to save himself.
Are they going to be judged? Affirmative.Calvinists?
When the angels were finally told to decide between Lucifer or the Lord?
Did they have free will?
........
Are they going to be judged? Affirmative.
Consequently there is no doubt whatsoever that they DO have free will.
Pharaoh COULD have repented and saved his nation. He was given more than ample opportunity AND reasons. Judgement type reasons.
But he refused. And it is ALL on the record. And he was judged righteously because of his WILLFUL decisions.
One of Satan's lies is that free will does NOT exist. Therefore Gods judgement is NOT just.....it is insanely cruel and unrighteous.
So who ya gonna believe?
Calvinites or Jesus God?
BTW....thems the choices imposed upon all those during the tribulation that much is clear. Satan will literally be right there alongside the Men of God and people will make a..... drumroll.....CHOICE.
A free will choice as to whom they will serve
Jos 24:15 - And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
The calvies threw logic out the door. Their own"logic'"shoots them in the foot. They claim man has no libertarian freewill. Here is an example of their "logic." And they are completely blind to this point............Calvinists?
When the angels were finally told to decide between Lucifer or the Lord?
Did they have free will?
........
At the heart of the matter the calvies and universalists are almost identical. They just differ on the numbers.I love Universalism with all my heart.
Unfortunately, I must adhere to the revelation and reality of the judgement on those that deny the Christ.
I occupy a difficult place where the tension between God's unconditional love for humanity and His righteous
judgement, is a very real phenomenon.
I boast in Jesus and His crucifixion and that's a simple, bona-fide doctrine.
It applies to all men by nature whether jew or gentile, whether Old test times or New test times, the indictment for them is outlined in Rom 3:9-1910 As it is written:
“There is no one righteous, not even one;
11 there is no one who understands;
there is no one who seeks God.
If that applied to all as you claimed?
Who could have written that passage?
And, it was citing Psalms 14:1-3!
1 The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good. 2 The LORD looks down from heaven on all mankind to see if there are any who understand, any who seek God. 3 All have turned away, all have become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one.
NOTE! It says that they "became" that way! Not that way by default, as you would have us to read it!
3 All have turned away, all have become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one.
Why "became" corrupt?
It spoke of a time of great national apostasy in the land and had departed from God's law.
Learn to exegete before you stand up in battel and get shot through with holes in your argument.
Calvinism is not some magic shield. It was an attempt to explain things.
in Christ ..............
Therefore, due to the typological nature of the Numbers account, we can't use this narrative to prove that spiritually dead sinners just naturally have this innate desire for eternal life and want to be saved from their sins, and can save themselves by their own power which freewillers call "freewill" ; for this isn't what is taught in Numbers.
The LIVING who looked to the Serpent obviously had this GOD-GIVEN universal gift called SELF-PRESERVATION within them (which even animals have!), which has nothing to do with eternal life in the spiriutal realm. But what ability or enablement or offer did the DEAD Israelites receive to save themselves!? It's cyrstal clear from the passage that this narrative strongly supports the Reformed view of salvation since only the LIVING can respond to a salvation offer.