Our works get judged, yes, but then again if we are actually in Christ Jesus we have already passed from death to life, andDoes scripture actually say that we all are going to be judged by our deeds and works ?
Romans 8:1-2; 5:57 + 58b
Our works get judged, yes, but then again if we are actually in Christ Jesus we have already passed from death to life, andDoes scripture actually say that we all are going to be judged by our deeds and works ?
Yes, this is the heart of the natural man, no doubt about it. I can be pretty stubborn too (still) but once my heart“But because of your stubbornness ( not you sister but the person who’s being stubborn ) and your unrepentant heart,
you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God’s wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed.
But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger.
There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile;
The definition of God's elect is correct. What specific part of this definition do you disagree with?
I think there are enough verses in the Bible to show we as ones it says are separated from God cannot then understand the things of God unless he makes it so.The illuminating power of the word of is the Spirit. We are born again by water and the Spirit. The Spirit is pretty easy. Water there is the word of God according to 1 Peter 1:23.
Jesus is the word and the Spirit is the spirit of Christ.
Our works get judged, yes, but then again if we are actually in Christ Jesus we have already passed from death to life, and
![]()
Romans 8:1-2; 5:57 + 58b
![]()
Many here outright deny that God enables/makes it possible, which they callI think there are enough verses in the Bible to show we as ones it says are separated from God cannot then understand the things of God unless he makes it so.
Isaiah 6 shows God insures there to be no understanding if he wills it so.
Jesus in Matthew 13 told us why he teaches in parables.
For me my experience with conversations with unbelievers shows there to be a wall against the teachings of God.
And this world and what occurs as crime against one another is a symptom of fallen nature.
I have a few things I need to do dear sister I will be back later . I hope you enjoy your coffee lol I’m out to buy a cup myself if I can find a normal cup of coffee out there without some fr each name or itslian style latte this or that Cappachino yadda I don’t like that stuff![]()
Ephesians 2:1-3 You were dead in your trespasses and sins, in which you used to walk when you conformed to the ways of this world and of the ruler of the power of the air, the spirit who is now at work in the sons of disobedience. All of us also lived among them at one time, fulfilling the cravings of our flesh and indulging its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature children of wrath.![]()
Ugh, no, I don't want that fancy schmancy stuff either, just coffee! Good luck, bro, and enjoy!I have a few things I need to do dear sister I will be back later . I hope you enjoy your coffee lol I’m out to buy a cup myself if I can find a normal cup of coffee out there without some fr each name or itslian style latte this or that Cappachino yadda I don’t like that stuff
Sine the definition of God's elect has the Trinity, you deny the Trinity.I disagree all of your definition of election, but as for verse 29, verse 28 defines who is represented by "whom he did foreknow"; that is, only those God "called according to his purpose", not based upon a person's actions nor choices, but God's - the "For" of V29 makes V29 a continuation V28.
There you go again, like a broken record.They make no distinction between the natural man and the spiritual man, and ascribe to the former what only the latter can do.
Sine the definition of God's elect has the Trinity, you deny the Trinity.
Matthew 10:33
But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.
The definition of God's elect is correct. What specific part of this definition do you disagree with?Not to be rude, but that makes no sense whatsoever. I do not deny the Trinity. God's elect are those He chose before the
foundation of the world unto salvation
[1Pe 1:2 KJV] 2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.
[Luk 18:7 KJV] 7 And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them?
[Rom 8:33 KJV] 33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? [It is] God that justifieth.
[Col 3:12 KJV] 12 Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering;
[Tit 1:1 KJV] 1 Paul, a servant of God, and an apostle of Jesus Christ, according to the faith of God's elect, and the acknowledging of the truth which is after godliness;
They are not the same. Executing someone? And, offering no room at your house???
The fact that you can equate the two is telling of your lack of capacity to reason sanely.
2 John 10-11
If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not take them into your house
or welcome them. Anyone who welcomes them shares in their wicked work.
The definition of God's elect is correct. What specific part of this definition do you disagree with?
This isn't about salvation, but a change in leadership. Look at the similarities of this and God coming to Moses in the burning bush.Here is a thought. Unfathomable to the Calvinites? Perhaps. But not my problem.
[Jos 5:13 NIV]
Now when Joshua was near Jericho, he looked up and saw a man standing in front of him with a drawn sword in his hand. Joshua went up to him and asked, "Are you for us or for our enemies?"
[Jos 5:14 NIV]
"Neither," he replied, "but as commander of the army of the LORD I have now come." Then Joshua fell facedown to the ground in reverence, and asked him, "What message does my Lord have for his servant?"
[Jos 5:15 NIV]
The commander of the LORD's army replied, "Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy." And Joshua did so.
I've never said God saves anyone against their will. Another strawman argument from you. And God not saving all of Israel was to show that salvation is not through natural birth, but supernatural.Oh and another thing:
There were TONS of unsaved Israelites.
And you thought God is saving them against their own will did you?
And there were also TONS of saved Israelites as well.
What pray tell was the cause of this DIVISION?
Thank You!That the elect are so not because of their actions or belief - they did not choose God, God chose them. They are solely the
recipients of that. Did you read 1 Pe 1:2, the "through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ", part?
Can you give an example of this? I keep hearing this, but when I go through the threads asking for prayer and advice and help, I see them filled with those of the reformed faith offering help.Hyper-Calvinites have a penchant to humiliate, denigrate and despise the "non-chosenites".
This pattern of behavior is a "tell". Of the most ominous kind.
The truth is hard for some to accept so they make up lies instead.I've never said God saves anyone against their will. Another strawman argument from you. And God
not saving all of Israel was to show that salvation is not through natural birth, but supernatural.