Trumps gonna win.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Whoa! What are we now going to prohibit those with dementia from serving? What about those with mental illness?

Consider the ramifications, if you do this we won't get such gems as “I can imagine what can be, and be unburdened by what has been,” or how about this “I love Venn diagrams. I really do, I love Venn diagrams. It’s just something about those three circles and the analysis about where there is the intersection, right?”


She's not mentally ill she was just drunk off her 1facf (1).png
 
Trump is an interesting piece of work, and it looks like 37% of the American people are his codependents.

It’s like the people living with drug addicts and yet they keep on making sure that the addict gets the drugs rolling in.
 
Whoa! What are we now going to prohibit those with dementia from serving? What about those with mental illness?

Consider the ramifications, if you do this we won't get such gems as “I can imagine what can be, and be unburdened by what has been,” or how about this “I love Venn diagrams. I really do, I love Venn diagrams. It’s just something about those three circles and the analysis about where there is the intersection, right?”

Do we even know how to define or recognize mental illness anymore? We probably should work on it for the next few years as long as we're working on defining lawlessness and maybe even "treason" for now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThereRoseaLamb
568692893_10231832874990466_2623721789954568691_n.jpg

Oooooh good find. Award emoji of the day winner for you.
 
Seems pretty clear why he did this, to make it harder to undo.
Hey RA. What seems pretty clear is you wake up every morning raring to go with some type of hate directed at our President.

How about an earnest prayer for him. Ya know, like Jesus tells you to?

569030829_868470222278356_745074470503175653_n.jpg
 
You can't be a felon should be one of the minimum qualifications for sure.:)

Actually it makes sense why that is not the case. Felonies are charged at the state level and subtly differ from state to state and the President is the federal level job. Obviously a state could be biased and attempt to place a fraudulent felony and mishandle a case against someone for political purposes. Besides even Trump showing the reasoning now you just think back to the Civil War when the democrat party tried playing similar games to attack the Republicans in the North for helping runaway slaves and such acts that were considered felonies in the South, but that were not felonies in the North states.
 
Actually it makes sense why that is not the case. Felonies are charged at the state level and subtly differ from state to state and the President is the federal level job. Obviously a state could be biased and attempt to place a fraudulent felony and mishandle a case against someone for political purposes. Besides even Trump showing the reasoning now you just think back to the Civil War when the democrat party tried playing similar games to attack the Republicans in the North for helping runaway slaves and such acts that were considered felonies in the South, but that were not felonies in the North states.

You should follow liberal games sometimes. They're fun.
For example:

"No one is above the law" - Letitia James.

Right you are miss James. Step right this way.
 
You should follow liberal games sometimes. They're fun.
For example:

"No one is above the law" - Letitia James.

Right you are miss James. Step right this way.

Well he does have somewhat of a point on a state level actually, many state forbid felons from voting or running for office in that state, and it makes sense to a degree too in that essentially they forfeit their citizenship status to a degree in that state by committing what that state considers to be a felony. Then actually some of the far left states like up in New England by you actually allow felons to vote or run for office and are more liberal in that regards to the status and citizenship rights and benefits of felons too. So it is an interesting and vast political issue on a state level and is legit thought here by seed, it's not like abstract or nothing, but the issue for a President is not whether they are guilty or the state law about a felony is arbitrary, it's more an issue of the federal level job of President has to be above the states and able to hold the collective whole nation together. At the federal level there's still some qualifications but they're pretty basic, you just have to be over 35, a natural born American citizen, and have lived in the US for at least like a decade or something like that. The emphasis is obviously on getting a candidate that is both a Real American as well as is likely to be highly loyal to America and well immersed in our culture too.
 
You should follow liberal games sometimes. They're fun.
For example:

"No one is above the law" - Letitia James.

Right you are miss James. Step right this way.

Well he does have somewhat of a point on a state level actually, many state forbid felons from voting or running for office in that state, and it makes sense to a degree too in that essentially they forfeit their citizenship status to a degree in that state by committing what that state considers to be a felony. Then actually some of the far left states like up in New England by you actually allow felons to vote or run for office and are more liberal in that regards to the status and citizenship rights and benefits of felons too. So it is an interesting and vast political issue on a state level and is legit thought here by seed, it's not like abstract or nothing, but the issue for a President is not whether they are guilty or the state law about a felony is arbitrary, it's more an issue of the federal level job of President has to be above the states and able to hold the collective whole nation together. At the federal level there's still some qualifications but they're pretty basic, you just have to be over 35, a natural born American citizen, and have lived in the US for at least like a decade or something like that. The emphasis is obviously on getting a candidate that is both a Real American as well as is likely to be highly loyal to America and well immersed in our culture too.

In terms of Trump and the NY cases specifically, though kinda old and stale at this point; it' was figured out already long ago that simply the felonies can be allowed stick and he could still run as President and his supporters very logically just say the democrats played politics and the democrats could be free to attempt to make this case and were given the ample media coverage to make the case before the election.. Because of this they did successfully prevent Trump from running from NY his beloved homestate, but to a degree that's the backfire for them cause Trump still won and goes into the books representing Florida instead for this term whom their state's laws let him run representing them and so they will reap the various benefits that brings for their state.

 
Trump is an interesting piece of work, and it looks like 37% of the American people are his codependents.

It’s like the people living with drug addicts and yet they keep on making sure that the addict gets the drugs rolling in.

"The spice must flow" --Baron Harkonnen, Frank Herbert's Dune


8jrijo.jpg
 
You sure? Looks older.
It is. It's simply meant to convey democrat hypocrisy. I believe that photo is from Roosevelt massive renovations.
The point is, all the squealing the satanic Dems are engaging in is simply because it's Trump doing it. AND he's doing it with PRIVATE money, not taxpayer money like other Presidents have.

They've made it difficult to find Obama's demolition work at the White House as they tried to scrub the internet photos.
Thankfully, Musk still always free speech. Here is a clip of how joyous the MSM is at Obama wasting 376 million taxpayer Dollars to put in a basketball court so racist Lebron James would play with him.

https://x.com/CollinsforTX/status/1981051305637675119
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan and Eli1
Status
Not open for further replies.