But if we actually read Jesus words, He never did away with the Law but rather showed the proper way it is to be followed:
I`ve been arguing with people over that ever since I joined this outfit.
But if we actually read Jesus words, He never did away with the Law but rather showed the proper way it is to be followed:
I`ve been arguing with people over that ever since I joined this outfit.
It seems the is a ravenous wolf teaching the doctrine of Balaam and Jezebel and thus misleadning the herd away from the Only Shepherd...
In my circle everyone agrees that Jesus is the One of Acts 3:21-23. and that He is our only Shepherd. King of kings, Lord of lords. Well I have met Catholics, many of them that believe the Pope can change things, but I do not believe this.
I meant I agreed that Jesus did not say He would do away with the Law. Calm down.
I mean in the world, I dont know what everyone here believes. But I see this in the world, peolpe say that many things the Bible says not to do is actually ok now.
Yeah it`s all just a sign that we are in the last of the last days.
Yes, deception and evil is increase. More reason to shine His light!
and Ps 2 is very nice:
Psalms 2:1-12, " 1 Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain? 2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD and against his Anointed, saying, 3 “Let us burst their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.” 4 He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision. 5 Then he will speak to them in his wrath, and terrify them in his fury, saying, 6 “As for me, I have set my King on Zion, my holy hill.” 7 I will tell of the decree: The LORD said to me, “You are my Son; today I have begotten you. 8 Ask of me, and I will make the nations your heritage, and the ends of the earth your possession. 9 You shall break them with a rod of iron and dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.” 10 Now therefore, O kings, be wise; be warned, O rulers of the earth. 11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. 12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and you perish in the way, for his wrath is quickly kindled. Blessed are all who take refuge in him.
I`m curious, how do you reconcile the Galatians controversy? I think it originates the another Jesus concept.
Well without touching on each verse, as that would be very time consuming, I would simply say much of what i have already.
I believe Jesus words are perfect and the pure teachings:
John 6:63 “It is the Spirit that gives life, the flesh does not profit at all. The words that I speak to you are Spirit and are life."
and that the Holy Spirit guides to these words/doctrine and that any that teach against Jesus words are the ones in error:
John 14:23-26, " 23 יהושע answered him, “If anyone loves Me, he shall guard My Word. And My Father shall love him, and We shall come to him and make Our stay with him. 24 “He who does not love Me does not guard My Words. And the Word which you hear is not Mine but of the Father Who sent Me. 25 “These Words I have spoken to you while still with you. 26 “But the Helper, the Set-apart Spirit, whom the Father shall send in My Name, He shall teach you all, and remind you of all that I said to you."
As to Paul being the writer of Galations, I think I have heard so many differnt intrepratations of pauls letters that again any that are differnt than what Jesus taught in the fleash are error. (John 14:23-26 above)
and finally anyone who says Jesus words are obselete is in error because according to Him they are forever:
Matthew 24:35, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away."
Now I have read in the other thread we talked in that ppl believe that Jesus words pre-cross are done away and "Paul is Jesus spokesmen"
However this goes against , directly against what Jesus Himself said.
If there is any other thing I have not answered you would have to be more specific, there is so much to read on these topics from so many ppl it is hard to cover every aspect.
And tricky to find one worth reading at times. Spam I calls it![]()
So you deal with it by considering Galatians false scripture?
Well that is not what I said. To clarify a staement I made, I DEFINITYLY think ppl who say Jesus words are done away and Paul speaks in Jesus place is a false doctrine.
As to Galatians and every book of the Bible there are tests of a prophet and of a legal case in Deut 13 & 19.
Any writer of Scriptre HAS TO pass these tests.
Even Jesus Himself had to:
John 5:31-32, " 31 If I alone bear witness about myself, my testimony is not true. 32 There is another who bears witness about me, and I know that the testimony that he bears about me is true."
Deut 19 15 “A single witness shall not suffice against a person for any crime or for any wrong in connection with any offense that he has committed. Only on the evidence of two witnesses or of three witnesses shall a charge be established."
ALso the Deut 13 test.
That`s not a direct answer. It`s common for Hebrew Roots people to reject the epistles. There`s no point in having a dialogue if you are going to do that.
The jesus who came understood the purpose of the law that it was given so when he came, his people would know who he was and why he came.
why would you want to go back to that which can only condemn, and not to that which can save (the fulfiment of the law)
Wasn't this referring to circumcision healing the part of the man that was circumcised, whereas Jesus healed the whole man? So if circumcision was allowed on the Sabbath, healing was even moreso? Jesus came to "fulfill the law", so circumcision, like the rest of the law, could not have been fulfilled until Messiah himself was cut off. Also, Jesus came first to the "lost sheep of Israel", so even if He could have abolished circumcision prior to the consumation, it would have been first to the Jews (not the Gentiles who were invited in after the Jews rejected their King). However, now that Messiah has come, and confirmed His covenant, I'd argue even circumcision isn't today required for Jews.Joh_7:23 If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day?
Why didn't Jesus say while He was with the disciples that one day a man named Paul would come and tell the Gentiles that they don't need the Law?
While I agree some aspects of the law do have benefits (e.g. health and hygiene benefits for circumcision, abstaining from pork and other unclean meats, washing etc.) isn't it spiritually dangerous to practice these to try to please God?I don't think you have to keep any of the law, however, God does promise blessings when you seek to understand and practice what He has placed on your heart and curses for disobedience.
Isn't it the opposite? Weren't the Jews concerned that Paul was forbidding them (Jews) to practice their customs such as circumcision, because he wasn't requiring Gentiles to be circumcised (or keep the rest of the law)?From the book of Acts we see Gentiles being told that they will learn the Law of Moses in the weekly synagogue meetings where the Torah is read.
Isn't it the opposite? Weren't the Jews concerned that Paul was forbidding them (Jews) to practice their customs such as circumcision, because he wasn't requiring Gentiles to be circumcised (or keep the rest of the law)?
Acts 21:21 - 25 And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. 22 What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come. 23 Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them;
24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. 25 As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication.
And tricky to find one worth reading at times. Spam I calls it![]()
So you deal with it by considering Galatians false scripture?
Ahh, FTS sounds very much like a "Red letter Christian".
It does. Believe me, It does.And what exactly is replacement theology if in fact it even exists?
yes,, Two sticks of Isreal (Judah/Israel( ie, the two kingdoms will unite as one again. and become oneDoesn’t the two sticks become one in end times?