I agree that prayer is not to bend God to our will, but ours to His.it may have been CS Lewis who said, the purpose of prayer is not to change God, but to change us
I agree that prayer is not to bend God to our will, but ours to His.it may have been CS Lewis who said, the purpose of prayer is not to change God, but to change us
If God can force His created beings to follow Him why did Satan rebel. Why did Adam rebel. Jesus died because of our bad choices. If God could have stopped these bad choices and saved Jesus from the torture of the cross why didn't He?
Adam was of the natural world. People seem to glaze over this as if it means nothing at all,If God can force His created beings to follow Him why did Satan rebel. Why did Adam rebel.
Jesus died because of our bad choices. If God could have stopped these bad choices and
saved Jesus from the torture of the cross why didn't He?
Adam was of the natural world. People seem to glaze over this as if it means nothing at all,
yet God knew it meant man would fail. Why did He not stop it? The general consensus seems
to be that God does not want to take hostages, but rather have people who will choose to love Him.
Choice is real but the will is not innately free. You are welcome .Thus free choice would then be real and no one a puppet, thanks Magenta
Choice is real but the will is not innately free. You are welcome .![]()
In the garden man had a good heart and loved God. He was only given one command, -If God gives a gift you and you don't want to open it or accept it. Would it be fair of God to force you to accept it.
If God tells people that "if you love me with all your heart you will be saved" and people don't have a choice, why does He even ask us to love Him?
Many of you are saying God forces His follower to follow Him. God forces those that love Him to love Him.
That is not love.
In the garden man had a good heart and loved God. He was only given one command, -
And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”
Adam had the ability to obey or not obey. He chose the later!
With this choice man lost the ability to please God in any way!
Fast forward to today!
When God draws us to Him (His elect), He does so by giving us a new heart. It is softened and once again has the ability to please God. Then when we hear and believe, we place our trust in the work that He has done for us.
Therefore, when we turn to God it is because we have received a new heart – not because we were forced. Without this circumcision of the heart that would not have been possible.
Now that is grace!
In order to even consider "open theism", or that god doesn't know the future, you would have to throw away the hundreds and hundreds of prophecies that God predicted through His Prophets that have already come true.
Since He can foretell the future, God certainly knows the future.
Mostly it seems that people have knee-jerk reactions to the word depravity without finding outInteresting not innately free, not understanding this not innately free, can oops accidentally cut"
What it means to those who preach total depravity is all that counts. and the Westminster Confession of Faith -- Reformed Theology -- says that it means that sinners are totally UNABLE to respond to the Gospel. Which is hogwash. So they created a whole new "gospel" where the so-called "elect" receive the Holy Spirit first, then believe, then they are saved. This is the REVERSE of what the Bible says.Mostly it seems that people have knee-jerk reactions to the word depravity without finding out what is really meant by it.
The Bible says that God made you alive in Christ while you were yet dead in your tresspasses and sins. Believers are not dead in their sins, so you have something confused... Also that Westminster confession of faith which you refer to an awful lot is not the only teacher of total depravity, and I think you should know that.What it means to those who preach total depravity is all that counts. and the Westminster Confession of Faith -- Reformed Theology -- says that it means that sinners are totally UNABLE to respond to the Gospel. Which is hogwash. So they created a whole new "gospel" where the so-called "elect" receive the Holy Spirit first, then believe, then they are saved. This is the REVERSE of what the Bible says.
Notice, he does not say, "and calls those things which do not yet appear, because they already are.God speaks to Abraham about the future as though it is already the past:
Romans 4:16-17Therefore [it is] of faith that [it might be] according to grace, so that the promise might be sure to all the seed, not only to those who are of the law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all (as it is written, [ "I have made you a father of many nations"]) in the presence of Him whom he believed—God, who gives life to the dead and calls those things which do not exist as though they did;
Adam didn't get to choose to be put in the garden:
Genesis 2:8The LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden, and there He put the man whom He had formed.and Saul did not choose Jesus, but Jesus chose him:
Acts 9:3-8As he journeyed he came near Damascus, and suddenly a light shone around him from heaven. Then he fell to the ground, and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?" And he said, "Who are You, Lord?" Then the Lord said, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. It [is] hard for you to kick against the goads." So he, trembling and astonished, said, "Lord, what do You want me to do?" Then the Lord [said] to him, "Arise and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do." And the men who journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice but seeing no one. Then Saul arose from the ground, and when his eyes were opened he saw no one. But they led him by the hand and brought [him] into Damascus.Acts 9:13-16Then Ananias answered, "Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much harm he has done to Your saints in Jerusalem. And here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call on Your name." But the Lord said to him, "Go, for he is a chosen vessel of Mine to bear My name before Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel. For I will show him how many things he must suffer for My name's sake."you might say Love doesn't always force, but sometimes He certainly does.
Except perhaps those who claim God is a tyrannical fraudulent kidnapper if and when He moves unilaterally.No one is claiming love cannot force actions.
No one has said in this thread , "God is a tyrannical fraudulent kidnapper if and when He moves unilaterally." I'm sure that "God moving unilaterally" was qualified as Him moving unilaterally to plant in a person who hates God foreign feelings of love for God, so that they suddenly cannot help but love God.Except perhaps those who claim God is a tyrannical fraudulent kidnapper if and when He moves unilaterally.
And those who agree with such as well, of course. Totally strange that anyone would, but there you have it. They do.
First you are sure it didn't happen but then it happened for some reason you guess at claiming as fact. Wow.No one has said in this thread , "God is a tyrannical fraudulent kidnapper if and when He moves unilaterally." I'm sure that "God moving unilaterally" was qualified as Him moving unilaterally to plant in a person who hates God foreign feelings of love for God, so that they suddenly cannot help but love God.
Notice, he does not say, "and calls those things which do not yet appear, because they already are.
It is also incorrect to say that God talks about future things in the past tense. OT Hebrew had no past, present and future tenses. They had completed and uncompleted aspects, sometimes called imperfective and perfective aspect. We cannot correspond the sense of Engish tenses onto how OT writers understood verbs in biblical Hebrew.
We do not depend on grammar to teach us the truth. Otherwise every Christian would need to be an expert grammarian.We cannot correspond the sense of Engish tenses onto how OT writers understood verbs in biblical Hebrew.