I can think of ways. . . to beget myselfYou can’t be your own father.
Surely God could outdo any of us. . .
I can think of ways. . . to beget myselfYou can’t be your own father.
Thank youI love this response! I am going to use this if I ever face questions regarding the Trinity. Wow. Awesome!
Stick around and you may come to get a better understanding of the members hereOn the surface this sounds good and if the recepient doesn't think deeply it probably works. Same as the explanation of 1 x 1 x 1 = 1 works. But the problem is one of metaphysics. The answer above is relationship. We have no problem seeing that each of us is in different relationships with other people and the list is very long from stranger and then acquaintance along various lines of depth to spouse. The trinity problem is not relationship but the metaphysics of it.
The answer is that God is superior to us in every way including metaphysically and we cannot measure his abilities or nature or Being with the limitations we know we have. We, for example, cannot separate our spirit from the rest of us and live at will. Our spirits do not enter another being in any case. He can send His spirit into lesser beings. Demonic elements can also inhabit another creature, by the way. Seems to be an ability spiritual beings have that we do not have and cannot really understand. So that is the real answer. We are lesser creatures and therefore do not fully understand the experience of higher creatures same as butterflys would not understand our existance. There are some things that are just beyond us.
YeahStick around and you may come to get a better understanding of the members here![]()
I don't see how my post referred to any members here at all. Where did I talk about any members in my post? I was talking about the answers to the question of trinity, not discussing a poster. What am I missing?Stick around and you may come to get a better understanding of the members here![]()
Yes I do (Isaiah 29:9-12), but unfortunately, you have taken it out of its context:
But let me ask if you know what scripture it is written that person who has not learned to read was given a book to read?
Just to clear up any misconceptions first, a "phonetic language" does not mean that a language can be spoken.
Luke 4:17 doesn't mention anything about someone not being able to read, but Isaiah 29:9-12 does.Actually the scripture I was referring unto was Luke 4:17.
So you think Jesus was illiterate?John 7:15 "And the Jews marveled, saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never learned?"
What verse are you asking about?So is pnuema 'moving air-wind' or a 'spirit'-?
Who is "the recipient"?I don't see how my post referred to any members here at all. Where did I talk about any members in my post? I was talking about the answers to the question of trinity, not discussing a poster. What am I missing?
Whoever asks the question, I think was my point. Mostly atheists ask this question.Who is "the recipient"?
I would think the recipient would be whoever reads the response... regardless of who asked the question.Whoever asks the question, I think was my point. Mostly atheists ask this question.
To me a recepient is who is receives something from asking. There are also observers. But if I give X to Mr B and 10 people watch, only one is the recipient. If Mr B asked a question, to me, he is the recipient of the answer even if 10 people watch.I would think the recipient would be whoever reads the response... regardless of who asked the question.
Yes, I understand what you mean, but on a site such as this, I see the recipient as anyone who reads the response. Of course reading it is not the same as receiving it, for receiving connotes understanding and acceptance. I make such a response as I did originally with the hope that such a question will even in some small way help someone, anyone, more firmly grasp that which we cannot fully comprehend in the first place. It is not meant to be absolute, but to inspire reflection that may yield insight and allay doubts as to how some things can be when they seemingly defy human logic.To me a recepient is who is receives something from asking. There are also observers. But if I give X to Mr B and 10 people watch, only one is the recipient. If Mr B asked a question, to me, he is the recipient of the answer even if 10 people watch.
But that’s my personal view. I don’t consider just anyone who reads what I write as a recipient. Some even read it and don’t receive a word. Do you see what I mean?
This is Oneness doctrine analogy...I like this analogy. Just throwing it in the mix.
When we look at the sun we see one huge sphere of light.
The Father.
Rays of light descends to earth.
The Son
The light warms the face.
The Holy Spirit.
Thank youI am glad you like it
Some have complained against it saying it is modalism but that is not true, because in modalism, rather than being eternally co-existent, the three Beings of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are manifest consecutively and never simultaneously. I plainly say the one is different persons all at the same time
![]()
terrible scribe. These youtube mockers have no reverence for the GodHead. it is a shame those who name the name of Jesus have no respect for the Living God. And try to simplify and lower God by human reasoning.