Verifiable proof is always relevant.
Who is going to verify you, lol.
Verifiable proof is always relevant.
I asked how are condoms and sex changes relevantVerifiable proof is always relevant.
Yeah they think all new sources are lying except Fox NewsWho is going to verify you, lol.
You forgot "and liar".Show the pictures and get some verified sources or you are simply another liberal talking head.
Yeah they think all new sources are lying except Fox News
I'm still trying to figure out what condoms has to do with this conversationObviously a lot is going to go to waste when overnight everything is halted.
Fox talks about condoms and that is all they know about!!
I'm still trying to figure out what condoms has to do with this conversation
I have no reliable source at present, but neither do you. The difference is you are making claims you cannot verify. That's dishonest.Who is going to verify you, lol.
They are examples of things not reported over long periods of time. But another poster wants us to believe that a government report was done in 2 weeks. I find that difficult to believe.I asked how are condoms and sex changes relevant
You gave a report attributed to no one. Who is the source of the story?I provided a source
Also why are you not answering my question
I provided a source you just said my source is lyingYou gave a report attributed to no one. Who is the source of the story?
The source you provided was citing another source but never gives the original source. How can the information be verified. You are accepting information as true that you have no idea whether it's true or not.I provided a source you just said my source is lying
Last time I'm going to ask before I just put you on ignore what does condoms have to do with this and why are you sending condoms to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STDs a bad thing
I provided a source you just said my source is lying
Last time I'm going to ask before I just put you on ignore what does condoms have to do with this and why are you sending condoms to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STDs a bad thing
I have no reliable source at present, but neither do you. The difference is you are making claims you cannot verify. That's dishonest.
When you can't dazzle with truth, you attempt to persuade with junk. Either give a source that can be verified or stop presenting things as truth that aren't.As per usual, let's bring out the moralizing.
Wow oh why do I ever respond to you..same ole, same ole.
And I didn't address you. You responded to a post of mine. I simply responded to your lack of a reliable source. All you had to do was give the proof for your claim.As per usual, let's bring out the moralizing, cause the condom story has been verified.
Wow oh why do I ever respond to you..same ole, same ole.
And I didn't address you. You responded to a post of mine. I simply responded to your lack of a reliable source. All you had to do was give the proof for your claim.
What is it called when someone posits a claim without proof?
Russia didn't directly interfere with the election but what they did was create thousands of fake Facebook accounts to propagandize AmericansWhen you can't dazzle with truth, you attempt to persuade with junk. Either give a source that can be verified or stop presenting things as truth that aren't.
Do you still believe the Russian hoax?