God determined to make man like Himself, “in His own image and likeness.” (Genesis 1:26-27) What would that likeness be? What could it be? God is an invisible spirit, and man has a very visible body of flesh and bones. It is hard to imagine that any similarity would be possible, but God can do all things. He made the first man like Himself just as He said He would.
Christians have disagreed sharply as to the nature of this likeness, although most of them, by far, the great majority of them, follow the teaching of a fourth century theologian named Augustine; they are sure that man’s original likeness to God was his holiness. God was — and still is -- holy; the man-creature would also be holy; he would be absolutely sinless. Moreover, God intended that man remain holy, but, alas! he sinned, so they believe that he lost his likeness to God. He was no longer “in God’s image” but became a fallen creature, a sinner by birth and, was, therefore, unable to obey God’s commandments.
A correct interpretation of every portion of God’s
word is important, but for this account it is especially crucial; it affects the interpretation of many important passages which follow, and it introduces the reader to both God and man. If God’s design of man allowed His principal creature to fail immediately, we must doubt His wisdom. His creative work was faulty. If man is as weak as most Christians believe he is, then constant failure must be expected. Obedience ceases to be important, for everybody will sin constantly. And, finally, God must be a very indulgent Being, for He apparently overlooks their failings, or they would not be Christians – and they rarely doubt that they are.
I have come to believe that man’s likeness to God is not his original holiness. There is no statement in the Bible declaring it. The idea originated with a theologian, not God. God’s holiness is unique. All that He does is right. Man is righteous only when he obeys God word. God is above His commandments. He says, for example, in Deuteronomy 32:39, “See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal.” No man can choose to do such things.
Christians have disagreed sharply as to the nature of this likeness, although most of them, by far, the great majority of them, follow the teaching of a fourth century theologian named Augustine; they are sure that man’s original likeness to God was his holiness. God was — and still is -- holy; the man-creature would also be holy; he would be absolutely sinless. Moreover, God intended that man remain holy, but, alas! he sinned, so they believe that he lost his likeness to God. He was no longer “in God’s image” but became a fallen creature, a sinner by birth and, was, therefore, unable to obey God’s commandments.
A correct interpretation of every portion of God’s
word is important, but for this account it is especially crucial; it affects the interpretation of many important passages which follow, and it introduces the reader to both God and man. If God’s design of man allowed His principal creature to fail immediately, we must doubt His wisdom. His creative work was faulty. If man is as weak as most Christians believe he is, then constant failure must be expected. Obedience ceases to be important, for everybody will sin constantly. And, finally, God must be a very indulgent Being, for He apparently overlooks their failings, or they would not be Christians – and they rarely doubt that they are.
I have come to believe that man’s likeness to God is not his original holiness. There is no statement in the Bible declaring it. The idea originated with a theologian, not God. God’s holiness is unique. All that He does is right. Man is righteous only when he obeys God word. God is above His commandments. He says, for example, in Deuteronomy 32:39, “See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal.” No man can choose to do such things.
- 1
- Show all