Did you even stop to think how absurd this statement is?The unsaved cannot suffer because they have never been given eternal life.
Did you even stop to think how absurd this statement is?The unsaved cannot suffer because they have never been given eternal life.
What on Earth are you talking about? Did you even read my post? I said I drank the bleach ACCIDENTALLY. I wasn't looking for a sign or testing the Lord.Sounds like one chasing after a sign before they would commit the faith that comes from hearing God as some sort of something to confirm something? (no sign gifts)
The signs follow after they do not lead us to confirm something that not there . The drinking of poison and it does not harm to a person represents false doctrines of men. They will not effect the true believers that refuses to go above all things written in the law and the prophets (sola scriptura).
Just those called a law of fathers that Christ called a brood of vipers. The poison of Asps is on their lips as they bring their lying signs as false wonders .
It is the perfect or complete law of faith they can quicken the soul of the lost, giving the simply ones a understanding of Him not seen The perfect law of faith as statues are infallible enlightening the eyes of our newly created hearts .
His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.
The law of the Lord is perfect, "converting the soul": the testimony of the Lord is sure, "making wise the simple".The statutes of the Lord are right, "rejoicing the heart": the commandment of the Lord is pure, "enlightening the eyes".Psalm 19:6-8 King James Version (KJV)
Did you even stop to think how absurd this statement is?
Eternal life is granted only to the saved.As of yet not person has shown me a verse showing that the unsaved will have eternal life
Eternal life is granted only to the saved.
Eternal existence is not the same as eternal life, and the unsaved will be in eternal torment (conscious existence) in the Lake of Fire. The devil and his angels will also have an eternal existence in torment, not eternal life. Study Revelation 14, 20, 21 and other Scriptures.
As of yet no person has shown me a verse showing that the unsaved will have eternal life,
everybody likes to use this parable and look at the rich man suffering and somehow having a conscience.
Is the fire a literal fire then and then people are literal as in physical and the fire also? What about the phrase 2nd death.
This is the only "parable-like illustration" in which a proper name is used.
The degree of detail shared is unusual; most parables are illustrations using analogues familiar to Jesus' hearers. This is a description of torment, which the hearers would not have known firsthand.
These suggest that it is not a parable.
Some suggest that Christ never spoke about Lazarus and the rich man. There is a claim that biblical copiers (those whose job was to hand write the 66 Books into multiple copies)(would have been 2nd and 3rd century Catholic Monks) inserted the story of Lazarus and the rich man since there was a message where a priest had made the example. Since the Catholics believe in a burning hell, legend states a certain biblical writer inserted the story. I think it's clear Christ never spoke of it by understanding throughout the entire 4 Gospels, most of what Christ did say we can find TWICE (once in Matthew and once in Luke etc for example). And the story of Lazarus and the rich man is only found in one Book.
Greetings rlm68,
Once you start going down that road within the word of God and deeming what is God-Breathed and was is not, then the word of God is no longer the word of God. We could not trust in what scripture says on any given topic. These types of apologetics are usually used to discredit the truth of any given Biblical topic that the individual or group is not in agreement with.
Paul states that "All scripture is God-Breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work." If we start dissecting God's word, then we are saying that God is not mighty enough to ensure that we have His true word.
I would therefore conclude this parable did not come from the mouth of Christ, but from the Catholic tradition being preached concerning a BURNING HELL!!
And the parables before and after this story can be found in other Gospels with no mention of this so-called parable.
Like post #81, what you said above makes no sense. I don't know what posts you've been reading or who you've been listening to, but you're not going to find any scripture stating that the unsaved will have eternal life. And I'm pretty sure that Nehemiah does not believe that the unsaved will have eternal life. The fact is that, unless a person believes in Christ, they remain in their sins and the wrath of God rests on them. If they die in that state, then they will be held accountable for their own sins, instead of Christ.
Um.... the rich man does have a conscious and is conscious, as he is having a conversation with Abraham, he can see Lazarus at Abraham's side, he can feel pain because he told Abraham that he was in torment in the flame. Therefore, why would you conclude that the rich man is not suffering as he said and that he is not conscious?
Like post #81, what you said above makes no sense. I don't know what posts you've been reading or who you've been listening to, but you're not going to find any scripture stating that the unsaved will have eternal life. And I'm pretty sure that Nehemiah does not believe that the unsaved will have eternal life. The fact is that, unless a person believes in Christ, they remain in their sins and the wrath of God rests on them. If they die in that state, then they will be held accountable for their own sins, instead of Christ.
Um.... the rich man does have a conscious and is conscious, as he is having a conversation with Abraham, he can see Lazarus at Abraham's side, he can feel pain because he told Abraham that he was in torment in the flame. Therefore, why would you conclude that the rich man is not suffering as he said and that he is not conscious?
What on Earth are you talking about? Did you even read my post? I said I drank the bleach ACCIDENTALLY. I wasn't looking for a sign or testing the Lord.
Also, is there ANY part of Scripture you don't allegorize? Did Jesus rise from the dead, or was that an allegory?
Not everything is a metaphor only the things described in parables. Without parables Christ spoke not hiding the unseen spiritual meaning from the unsaved revealing it to His children that walk by faith .The unseen eternal
Asserting that everything is a metaphor or allegory IS UNBELIEF!
Drinking poison is used in parables throughout the scripture to represent a false gospel coming from false apostles. Those who obey the word of God and do not go above that which is written they will not be effected by the false doctrines by believing the lie.
So... the faithful followers of Christ, who drink the deadly poison of false teaching, will not be hurt by it?
That simply doesn't follow. If it did, then we would have no concern about false teaching, because we could be confident that there is no danger from it.
Your view that everything is a parable is simply nonsensical at times.
The parable acts as a warning not to go beyond that which is written . In that way the elect that do not go above that which is written would be impossible to deceive.
Matthew 24:24For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
Poison of serpents is used as a metaphor to represent false doctrines.
Deuteronomy 32:33 Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps.
Bible search results
Deuteronomy 32:24They shall be burnt with hunger, and devoured with burning heat, and with bitter destruction: I will also send the teeth of beasts upon them, with the poison of serpents of the dust.
Deuteronomy 32:33 Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps.
Job 6:4For the arrows of the Almighty are within me, the poison whereof drinketh up my spirit: the terrors of God do set themselves in array against me.
Job 20:16He shall suck the poison of asps: the viper's tongue shall slay him.
Psalm 58:4 Their poison is like the poison of a serpent: they are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear;
Psalm 140:3They have sharpened their tongues like a serpent; adders' poison is under their lips. Selah.
Romans 3:13 Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:
Mankind drank the poison of false doctrine and died.
Genesis 3 King James Version (KJV) Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Your position does not jibe with the Scripture, no matter how often you repeat it.
You continue to persist in this fantasy in spite of everything.It jives but the problem is that many do not understand unless it says directly being a parable or otherwise.
You continue to persist in this fantasy in spite of everything.
Just goes to show that once someone latches on to a false idea, he or she simply refuses to give it up, no matter what.
Your position does not jibe with the Scripture, no matter how often you repeat it.
Jesus does not say it is not a parable, either. Accepting the story of Lazarus and the rich man as a parable does not amount to lack of belief, eitherTo ascribe Scripture as an allegory, when there is no mention of the accounts being a parable or allegory, whether in OT or NT IS UNBELIEF...
Jesus does not say it's a parable. It is in no way structured as one. And is not meant to be one.
It amazes me why believers have such hard time believing Scripture. Just because parts make us uncomfortable, isn't a valid reason to dismiss.
So nobody ever lost money, and rejoiced when the money was found? AndA parable is "A simple story used to illustrate a moral or spiritual lesson, as told by Jesus in the Gospels." (Oxford dictionary)
A parable is not the retelling of a historical event. There is no such thing as a "historically true parable".