This is not an answer IASAS
Revelation 5:9-12 "after Jesus was slain" is when it was revealed why would you think it is going to be found in Daniel if it was sealed until "after he was slain"?
This is not an answer IASAS
why so much hate towards dispensationalists on this forum? what is it thats so bad about dispensationalism?
Greetings iamsoandso,
Just fyi, the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments will affect everyone who is on the planet at that time. Even the great tribulation saints are exposed to them, as revealed in Rev.7:16 -
"Never again will they hunger; never again will they thirst.The sun will not beat down on them,’nor any scorching heat."
The above is in reference to the events of wrath as a result of the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments.
In Revelation the vials,seals ect. are poured out on those who received the mark,worshipped the image had the number ect. so if the weeks are fulfilled in Daniel then the DOJ in ad70 was when this was done. It brings every thing down to if they had the mark or not because of Revelation 14:11 ,Rev.16;2 Rev. 19:20 ect. so if anyone could provide a reasonable explanation as to it's fulfilment(identify the mark of the beast) then no that would place the vials,seals ect. back then and so they would not apply to any of the future of mankind after ad70.
I can tell you the root of the entire deal is Israel.
When Israel became a nation,it was reset on the prophetic.
That component is HUGE.
OK,that alone destroys their deal. They MUST work around it. They MUST make it disappear..
THAT MEANS DISPENSATIONS HAVE TO BE A FAIRY TALE.
See that? That is their starting place. Their starting place is bogus.
THAT IS WHY YOU WILL NEVER,EVER,GET ON THE SAME PAGE.
They must reinvent themselves.....and that ain't happening.
I just don't understand this at all
Greetings iamsoandso,
Just fyi, the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments will affect everyone who is on the planet at that time. Even the great tribulation saints are exposed to them, as revealed in Rev.7:16 -
"Never again will they hunger; never again will they thirst.The sun will not beat down on them,’nor any scorching heat."
The above is in reference to the events of wrath as a result of the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments.
Revelation was written 20 years after the historicist supposed fulfillment,making it impossible .Lokk at it this way,
If the destruction of ad70 is because they had the mark,worshipped the beast ect. then it's already fulfilled past tense. The thing about it is that if Rome,Ceasar,Vespasian,Titus ect. are the beast whom the mark applies to then the Jews who were involved in the first Jewish revolt minted their own money in ad66 and refused to use Rome's money/mark and they refused to honour Rome's authority they rebelled/revolted(see Josephus).
So if the Jews refused to bow down to the Romans and he was the beast of Revelation 13 then they refused to take the mark of the beast. In Romans 13 and 1Peter 2 the Christians are told to Honour the authority over them as Ordained by God(Rome at that time) and used the money of Rome to buy and sell. So if they bowed down to Rome as the authority over them as ordained by God then they would have received the mark of the beast(cant be right,right?). Notice that the marks would be on the incorrect foreheads if Revelation 13 was fulfilled in ad66-70.
The "wrath" is poured out on those who have the mark, worship the image etc. but is this before or after those are sealed with the mark of God in Revelation 7:3?
So is what happens to the ones with the mark of God a result of the tribulation of those days by the beast or is it what happens because of Gods wrath?
In other words is the vials, plagues etc., because of what the beast does or is it just poured on everyone who is in the earth in that day?
The verse you referenced to is not speaking of natural unconverted man (the mark) represented by the word six hundred adn sixty six, the number of man as a beast of the field (flesh and blood)
It is speaking from the vatage point of the new heavens and earth the second and final ressurection . The old corrupted has already vanished never to return again
Hello iamsoandso! Well, if you notice the seal of the 144,000 takes place after the 6th seal is opened. Therefore, since the wrath of God begins with the 1st seal being opened, the sealing of the 144,000 takes place after the 6th seal and prior to the 7th seal, where the angels are given their trumpets. Consequently, scripture specifies that the 144,000 are only protected from the affects of the 5th trumpet (Rev.9:4). In addition, there is nothing in scripture that states that the great tribulation saints are protected from God's plagues of wrath.
The events of the beast, the false prophet and all that they do is apart of God's wrath. God's wrath will be in operation in form or another during that entire seven years. God even uses the beast and the ten kings to destroy the woman who rides the beast (Rev.17:16-17).
We also know that the beast and his kingdom is apart of God's wrath, because the seven years that the antichrist will establish with Israel, is the fulfillment of that last seven years of the seventy sevens that were decreed upon Israel and Jerusalem (Dan.9:24)
The seals, trumpets and bowl judgments will be the fulfillment of the day of the Lord. It will be poured out on all the inhabitants of the earth. God even uses the 5th bowl judgment specifically for the beast and his kingdom (Rev.16:10)
As an example that God's wrath will affect everyone, how could anyone be protected from a third of the earth and trees being burned up? Or at the sounding of the 5th trumpet, how can anyone escape the torment of those demonic beings who come out of the Abyss to sting the inhabitants with stings like a scorpion? At the pouring out of the 4th bowl, an angel pours out his bowl on the sun so that it scorches the people of the earth with intense heat. How can anyone not be affected by that? As I said earlier, the only ones who are exempt from the 5th trumpet will be those 144,000, but no other protection is mentioned for them or anyone else.
Lokk at it this way,
If the destruction of ad70 is because they had the mark,worshipped the beast ect. then it's already fulfilled past tense. The thing about it is that if Rome,Ceasar,Vespasian,Titus ect. are the beast whom the mark applies to then the Jews who were involved in the first Jewish revolt minted their own money in ad66 and refused to use Rome's money/mark and they refused to honour Rome's authority they rebelled/revolted(see Josephus).
So if the Jews refused to bow down to the Romans and he was the beast of Revelation 13 then they refused to take the mark of the beast. In Romans 13 and 1Peter 2 the Christians are told to Honour the authority over them as Ordained by God(Rome at that time) and used the money of Rome to buy and sell. So if they bowed down to Rome as the authority over them as ordained by God then they would have received the mark of the beast(cant be right,right?). Notice that the marks would be on the incorrect foreheads if Revelation 13 was fulfilled in ad66-70.
The destruction of the Temple is nothing to do with the mark of the beast
Where did you get this, it is messed up?
Funny how you can show them the "7th" trump thingy,and they will still misconstrue it.
Exactly, the mark,number ect. are post DOJ...
why so much hate towards dispensationalists on this forum? what is it thats so bad about dispensationalism?
The dead in Christ rise pretrib
only those in Christ are risen.
Now,the third resurrection is at the GWT judgement. That includes all excluded in the 1thess resurrection.
The first being Jesus and the patriarchs while the disciples walked the earth.
Exactly, the mark,number ect. are post DOJ...
Thank you for this gem VCO. You have just unearthed a dirty little secret for us.
As I have been saying for a long time, Daniel's 70 weeks ended in AD 73.
The orthodox false narrative on the 70 weeks is that they ended in Jesus's Ballpark Era, (in paraphrasis).
However, this is based on dating Ezra and Nehemiah to 445BC.
Wow! How did this ever pass through the test of scholarship?
Ezra was at least 30 years old when Cyrus liberated Israel from captivity in 537BC.
So in 445BC he would have been......
at least 122 years old. (Zerubbabel likewise would have been on advanced life support).
Alarms bells ringing yet?
The 445 BC decree looks to be not only spurious, but downright dishonest. A scam.
Ezra quite clearly dates Ahasuerus / Artaxerxes to the time of Cyrus and Darius.
Ezra and Nehemiah were contemporaries, both writing in the aftermath of the release, 537BC to 516BC
Wow. I am stunned that this falsification has passed unchallenged so long. Simply stunned.