That's pretty interesting about the attempts to rebuild the temple.I wish to ask antoher question. I see many are waiting for the Abomination of Desolation that Our Lord Jesus Christ mentions in Matthew 24:15 however it is clear from the context that Jesus here is speaking to His disciples and that generation shall not pass.
Therefore if Jesus had in mind something that would only occur thousands of years later it would be very strange, how do you get around this fact? What makes the situation even more sticky is that the Temple was destroyed just like Jesus predicted so I am quite sure many of His disciples thought that what Jesus said came true instead of sitting down and saying "let us wait for a new temple to be built 2000 years later maybe that time it will be the abomination of desolation".
I do not understand why there needs to be a gap added to the final week? The gap is not mentioned anywhere in the Scriptures nor is there any reason to add any such gap, Daniel 9:27 looks fulfilled to me, how is it not fulfilled? Where do you come up with the gap?
I am aware of some prophecies having multiple fulfillments as someone has said. But by my count this would be the 3rd Abomination of Desolation, one is recorded in the book of Maccabees before Jesus was born and the other in 70 AD, so if they get the temple re-built it would be the 3rd.
Also look at history, they have tried to rebuild it many times and never have succeeded (Almost as if God doesn't want it):
(quote from wikipedia):
"the project of rebuilding the temple was aborted because each time the workers tried to build the temple using the existing substructure, they were burned by terrible flames coming from inside the earth and an earthquake negated what work was made:
Julian thought to rebuild at an extravagant expense the proud Temple once at Jerusalem, and committed this task to Alypius of Antioch. Alypius set vigorously to work, and was seconded by the governor of the province; when fearful balls of fire, breaking out near the foundations, continued their attacks, till the workmen, after repeated scorchings, could approach no more: and he gave up the attempt.[SUP][15]"[/SUP]
I have never come across anyone so convinced Preterism is true.
I think you're in for a big surprise one of these days.
No, Israel was not attacked and destroyed by the Medes. The Medes freed them. However, in Revelation Israel is called Babylon because of their pagan worship and destruction to come.Those veres in Isaiah are talking Israel... Israel IS Babylon and Sodom and Egypt.
Revelation 11:8 KJV
And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
In my opinion, your argument is very weak. "give ear, O earth" is not referring specifically to Israel.Absolutely. The prophets like to copy each other so let's look at the greatest prophet of all (after Jesus). He wasn't speaking to or about literally the heavens and earth. He was speaking instead to the entirety of his people.shrume said:Do you have an example of that [The "earth" often times refers to Israel.]
Isa 1:
[SUP]2 [/SUP]Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth!
For the Lord has spoken:
“I have nourished and brought up children,
And they have rebelled against Me;
[SUP]3 [/SUP]The ox knows its owner
And the donkey its master’s crib;
But Israel does not know,
My people do not consider.”
[SUP]4 [/SUP]Alas, sinful nation,
A people laden with iniquity,
A brood of evildoers
I wish to ask antoher question. I see many are waiting for the Abomination of Desolation that Our Lord Jesus Christ mentions in Matthew 24:15 however it is clear from the context that Jesus here is speaking to His disciples and that generation shall not pass.
Therefore if Jesus had in mind something that would only occur thousands of years later it would be very strange, how do you get around this fact? What makes the situation even more sticky is that the Temple was destroyed just like Jesus predicted so I am quite sure many of His disciples thought that what Jesus said came true instead of sitting down and saying "let us wait for a new temple to be built 2000 years later maybe that time it will be the abomination of desolation".
I do not understand why there needs to be a gap added to the final week? The gap is not mentioned anywhere in the Scriptures nor is there any reason to add any such gap, Daniel 9:27 looks fulfilled to me, how is it not fulfilled? Where do you come up with the gap?
No, Israel was not attacked and destroyed by the Medes. The Medes freed them. However, in Revelation Israel is called Babylon because of their pagan worship and destruction to come.
Amen, I agree!!In my opinion, your argument is very weak. "give ear, O earth" is not referring specifically to Israel.
It's simply a broad declaration that when God speaks He wants everyone in heaven and earth to listen. He then goes on to talk ABOUT Israel, but "earth" in that verse, or the many other verses where that declaration is used, does not refer specifically to Israel.
Exactly!!!I wish to ask antoher question. I see many are waiting for the Abomination of Desolation that Our Lord Jesus Christ mentions in Matthew 24:15 however it is clear from the context that Jesus here is speaking to His disciples and that generation shall not pass.
Therefore if Jesus had in mind something that would only occur thousands of years later it would be very strange, how do you get around this fact? What makes the situation even more sticky is that the Temple was destroyed just like Jesus predicted so I am quite sure many of His disciples thought that what Jesus said came true instead of sitting down and saying "let us wait for a new temple to be built 2000 years later maybe that time it will be the abomination of desolation".
I do not understand why there needs to be a gap added to the final week? The gap is not mentioned anywhere in the Scriptures nor is there any reason to add any such gap, Daniel 9:27 looks fulfilled to me, how is it not fulfilled? Where do you come up with the gap?
I am aware of some prophecies having multiple fulfillments as someone has said. But by my count this would be the 3rd Abomination of Desolation, one is recorded in the book of Maccabees before Jesus was born and the other in 70 AD, so if they get the temple re-built it would be the 3rd.
Also look at history, they have tried to rebuild it many times and never have succeeded (Almost as if God doesn't want it):
(quote from wikipedia):
"the project of rebuilding the temple was aborted because each time the workers tried to build the temple using the existing substructure, they were burned by terrible flames coming from inside the earth and an earthquake negated what work was made:
Julian thought to rebuild at an extravagant expense the proud Temple once at Jerusalem, and committed this task to Alypius of Antioch. Alypius set vigorously to work, and was seconded by the governor of the province; when fearful balls of fire, breaking out near the foundations, continued their attacks, till the workmen, after repeated scorchings, could approach no more: and he gave up the attempt.[SUP][15]"[/SUP]
Isaiah 13:20 KJV
It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation: neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds make their fold there.
Egypt is inhabited and people have dwelt there from generation to generation and the Arabian pitches his tent in Eqypt today.
Again, Isa 13 dealt with Babylon, not Egypt and not Israel. The ancient city of Babylon in Iraq was found and it is a huge archeological site. Do you see any Arab tents in these pictures?
![]()
![]()
![]()
In my opinion, your argument is very weak. "give ear, O earth" is not referring specifically to Israel.
It's simply a broad declaration that when God speaks He wants everyone in heaven and earth to listen. He then goes on to talk ABOUT Israel, but "earth" in that verse, or the many other verses where that declaration is used, does not refer specifically to Israel.
Yes you're right Babyon, not Egypt... but spiritual Babylon is Israel. Isaiah 13 is the same story as Joel.
Isaiah 13:10 KJV
For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.
Am I the only one who sees a connection between Israel and footstool? How about here?
I disagree. The parousia, meaning the second coming, of Jesus Christ did not happen in 70 AD. It still has not happened.That's right, the parousia (Presence) of Christ returned in 70 AD fulfilling all of these "wrath" prophesies and ending the Law and ushering in the "Church age."
FWIW, I disagree with that too.FYI. The "Tribes of the Earth" are the "Tribes of Israel."
And if I hear another word about a future world-wide 7 year great tribulation and pre-trib rapture I'm gonna start one for you to make you happy...
![]()
I'll bet you're the only one (along with possibly other Preterists) who sees "earth" as referring to Israel.
I disagree. The parousia, meaning the second coming, of Jesus Christ did not happen in 70 AD. It still has not happened.
...but believe as you will. It has been my experience on bible discussion forums that VERY few people ever change their mind about anything.
True, including you.
Time will tell, PlainWord. And just maybe not much more time.Go ahead and keep waiting for events which were fulfilled 2,000 years ago. That is certainly your prerogative.