Try the first 3 chapters of Genesis. A list of Creation starting with the heavens and earth going through creating all the plants and animals culminating with creating Adam and Eve.
God created not the idiotic evolution theory. DNA doesn't allow changes to itself. Also there is C14 in diamonds. Also s8int.com lists all kinds of facts that refute millions of years of evolution.
Evolution: change with respect to time
Evolution: change in the nature of an organism as a result of genetic mutations
Evolution: development of new kinds/species over long ages as a result of genetic mutations and environmental pressures
Evolution: the belief that all life is the result of millions of accidents
Evolution: the conscious rejection of any idea of an omnipotent (or benevolent) Creator
The first is not a lie.
Let's be clear and honest about which sense we're using.
ROFL
Explain away the fact that diamonds have C14. The site s8int.com details scientific evidence of a short history. Live with what science says instead of the atheist concept of millions of years.The earth and universe is 13,000 years old.
Or,
The earth and universe is older than 13,000 years old.
I'm going with older than 13,000 years.
History doesn't end at 13,000 years ago. It continues back millions of years.
---------
ROFL
I know exactly what evolution is and the simple fact that science currently says it is not factual. The way that scientists have found DNA acts proves evolution is absolutely not scientific. Any modification to DNA has a still born birth. I suggest you go with what is scientifically feasible not what isn't feasible. Evolution is not feasible. Of course the atheists must hold to it because they don't believe in the Genesis account.
Explain away the fact that diamonds have C14. The site s8int.com details scientific evidence of a short history. Live with what science says instead of the atheist concept of millions of years.
ROFL
I know exactly what evolution is and the simple fact that science currently says it is not factual. The way that scientists have found DNA acts proves evolution is absolutely not scientific. Any modification to DNA has a still born birth. I suggest you go with what is scientifically feasible not what isn't feasible. Evolution is not feasible. Of course the atheists must hold to it because they don't believe in the Genesis account.
Explain away the fact that diamonds have C14. The site s8int.com details scientific evidence of a short history. Live with what science says instead of the atheist concept of millions of years.
Just to be fair..please post specific documentations by scientist saying tgat any form of evolution is invalid and not factual..thanks..ill be waiting..
I would rather you find the proof that man directly evolved from apes. I will be waiting.
Or that man has evolved period. I will still be waiting
In my VERY FIRST POST..since i KNOW you didnt read it..i SAID that man didnt evolve from apes..MAN was created in GODS image n i dont think he was an ape..HOWEVER i do NOT believe that man looked THEN as they do now..NOR will look in the future..nexr time PLEASE do your homework..all evilutuon DOESNT mean datwyn...maybe you should read my other posts...
I would rather you find the proof that man directly evolved from apes. I will be waiting.
Or that man has evolved period. I will still be waiting
I did read it and you also stated that man is still evolving so I am wondering if you have a concrete example or are you really meaning he is adapting?
You can pretty much predict future by present..if man looked different 100-500 yrs ago..how can you NOT say he'll look n be different 100-500 yrs in the future?
I did read it and you also stated that man is still evolving so I am wondering if you have a concrete example or are you really meaning he is adapting?
Looking different is not evolving, evolving is going to something more complex, do you think his brain has evolved in the last 6000 years.
There is not evidence that man physiologically, biological and neurologically was different than the way his now we have adapted and learned but we have not evolved. We have the same DNA.
Looking different is not evolving, evolving is going to something more complex, do you think his brain has evolved in the last 6000 years.
There is not evidence that man physiologically, biological and neurologically was different than the way his now we have adapted and learned but we have not evolved. We have the same DNA.