The Holy Bible is the standarn, as the word, holy, signifies, and comparison against all other texts proves.
OH! I See the light! It says "Holy". Holy Bible.
The Holy Bible is the standarn, as the word, holy, signifies, and comparison against all other texts proves.
OH! I See the light! It says "Holy". Holy Bible.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I reject and criticize what I consider a dummed down, casual, approach to scripture that suggests that whatever any one reads as scripture is, ok.
I see you name yourself Studyman, and I can't reconcile that name with any thing goes approach to modern versions that disagree among themselves, create confusion, promote false doctrines and many other ills evident in todays churches.
From my perspective, and that is a perspective of a nobody who studied outside the influence of any religious franchise claiming Jesus as their Savior, I would say the truth is found in most if not all translations. I have found that most (I haven't read them all) translations teach that God is a Spirit, and the understanding of His Word is a Spiritual understanding given to some and withheld from others. I would be glad to show scriptures which support this but the thread isn't really about teaching, rather, translations.
I believe The Great God of Abraham, who came to earth as a man in the form of Jesus, can guide those who are truly seeking Him into all truth. If a person is seeking to "know Him" Jesus will let Himself be known. There are "many" who come in His Name, who use His Word as a tool for justification of their lifestyle, or religious traditions. In todays world we can "translation hunt" to find a Bible that we can more easily bend towards this religious tradition or that. But those who are from the heart, seeking to know Him, and not just confirm the religion we were born into, we have a promise given in most all translations that He will "manifest Himself" to us.
Philippians 3:8
KJV - Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,
I wonder why the new versions didn't change the word dung to it's new updated perverse four letter word? I'm sorry but rubbish is not the same as dung. New version fail once more...
Were you there for the signing?![]()
Yes.
If you remember I was just in front of you in the queue
"Dung"
occurs 15 times in 15 verses in the NIV.
It also happens to be a fitting designation for the KJVO cult.
Your NIV uses the word "garbage". Not even close.
Your NIV uses the word "garbage". Not even close.
OH! I See the light! It says "Holy". Holy Bible.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't know what it is.OK, what is King James 2000 Bible? I am confused from so many KJV versions.
Did you know that the Bible is the most stolen book in the world
In the context of a mechanical object I suppose those three words equate.
In the context of scripture those three words don't equate.
Thinking that different words equate is indeed, a casual notion.
The word of God is quick.
That word choice is destroyed and weakened by changing "quick" to "fast" or "speedily."
If you look closer at those words you will find one of them incorporates meaning that goes beyond the limitations of the others.
The Holy Bible tends to present a word that is not so limited in meaning.
And, the God is precise in his consistency of use of a word, which is why I remarked on numbers, and words as God uses them in his Holy Bible.
If we know God doesn't disallow diversity in quotes...then...does that mean that all diversity is good?
I see that God, by allowing diversity in his Holy Bible, is teaching us how to avoid the falsehoods found in other bibles claiming to be of God. Compare.
The Holy Bible is the standarn, as the word, holy, signifies, and comparison against all other texts proves.
You're supposed to be able to take the ones in hotels, right?