How is that relevant to understanding what happened in Genesis 3?You can stop sinning right now and never live in it again.
So it said of Jesus.
How is that relevant to understanding what happened in Genesis 3?You can stop sinning right now and never live in it again.
So it said of Jesus.
It is the truth.How is that relevant to understanding what happened in Genesis 3?
Hopefully not....He knew better than going against the Lord's command yet done it anyways to please Eve.Adam "knowingly" committed sin. It is most likely that he knew the consequences of their actions and yet still committed sin. Adam loved his wife so much, that he joined her in sin. Gentlemen, do we love our wives this much?![]()
So is "2 + 2 = 4". My question again: how is it relevant?It is the truth.
My answer again...So is "2 + 2 = 4". My question again: how is it relevant?
Apparently the concept of "relevance" has eluded you. That's unfortunate.My answer again...
THEY ARE BOTH THE TRUTH.
So you do not believe that they are not related to one another even though both are the truth?Apparently the concept of "relevance" has eluded you. That's unfortunate.
oic, logic is king. btw, is adding the word 'magical' to tree, logical or emotional?To put a magical tree in the middle of garden and say, “Don’t eat it,” isn’t logical.
So is "2 + 2 = 4". My question again: how is it relevant?
Who on this forum are you addressing? (quoting the person would help)Apparently the concept of "relevance" has eluded you. That's unfortunate.
Who on this forum are you addressing? (quoting the person would help)
Thanks, I'll check my ignored person. lolsomeone you have on ignore . . ? Dino was replying to mr. 00000
i haven't ignored anyone; i don't know what it looks like when you do
The promise given for eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was death.The Two Trees
Something that many overlook is that the story mentions two trees. The tree of knowledge is what people most distinctively remember about that story. The other of course, is the tree of life. Both trees were special. One gave knowledge. The other, had some role in maintaining life to Adam and Eve and possibly to the animals as well.
That's assuming he understood what the serpent was.Adam is not commended in Scripture for his disobedience and foolishness. He should have loved his wife enough so that she would not have had a dialogue with the devil. At the very least, he should have thrown that serpent out of Eden.
Good point.The promise given for eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was death.
Adam and Eve existed in the natural without eating of the Tree of Life.
Metaphorical.oic, logic is king. btw, is adding the word 'magical' to tree, logical or emotional?
If God is the same yesterday and today and forever, why is He so different throughout scripture? One week He’s speaking existence into completion then takes a six thousand year vacation from creating? Believe every word literally and insult me as you see fit. I don’t know what the point of praying for wisdom is if everything is plainly translated in English for all to unquestioningly accept?This reminds me of what the serpent said to Eve..., "Yea, hath God said," (Gen 3.1). His game of doubt is being played out in you.
Sounds like you have been indoctrinated in a liberal seminary and have been brainwashed in humanistic rationalism. A modern day Sadducee, rejecting the miraculous. You might as well toss out all the miracles in the Bible.
Again this holds so true...
Isaiah 8:20 (KJV) To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
The serpent was an intruder. That should have been enough. Eden was strictly for Adam and Eve. All other creatures were outside.That's assuming he understood what the serpent was.
I wasn't aware of that. That's a doctrine I haven't learned yet.The serpent was an intruder. That should have been enough. Eden was strictly for Adam and Eve. All other creatures were outside.