Paul can be disputed, but not refuted
Since people dispute (debate) Paul? He can be disputed. However, he cannot be refuted (proved wrong is the definition).
On what do you base your accusation of anyone who believes in the old testament as scripture, as is meant by Hebrew roots? I would like to see your evidence.
What I hear is blah blah blah, as you reject word definitions to split hairs trying to make me wrong about something you imagine to be true, but is not. In other words, in your own words, you are incapable of seeing a point. In fact, I was not even disputing what you said, but what EG said! However, you miss that point entirely, also.
It’s not a guide. If it is you just contradicted yourself saying that our righteousness does not come from the law
I never made any such accusation
It was what Grandpa wrote. My help comes from the Lord and scripture, I'm retired and spend hours each day with that help. I am sorry we so often disagree about scripture. It so often seems to make you angry. I love scripture, it is hard for me not to speak about it, I hope your anger can be soothed. I will put you on ignore and not respond to you, I hope that will help.
But think of the disputes and misunderstandings during the three years Christ was teaching. We have to hold close to Christ and let them rage around us, but never touching our souls. I'll try harder.
) it says that God will give us new knowledge in the end days (paraphrasing like crazy now)...
Somewhere in the Bible (can't remember where
It does seem to be how our time is shaping up, now. The roots movement started after the aftermath of Hitler resulted in the return of the Jews to Israel. Some of the scholars who are financed by that movement have a policy of strictly staying with scripture and carefully keep their personal thoughts out of their writing, or if they interpret they tell you so and why. I have found that people who have worked with the dead sea scrolls seem to be the most accurate when reporting history of the Jews. When I study Hebrew history I carefully check their background for ties with these scrolls. The scrolls were found in the 40's. I have read that they were the scrolls that were discarded because they were worn, and they felt no scripture should be destroyed. They are the oldest information that has been found.Somewhere in the Bible (can't remember where
Lol. Saying I said something I did not say is not scripture. You do that all the time to people. Then when they call you out in it this is what you do
I know I said I wouldn't respond to your taunts of me, but I do want to defent myself from you. You said "hebrew roots fail because they go to the symbol and minimize the reality". Hebrew roots is looking to the roots (the old testament) Christianity to understand God. I cut to the chase by calling it the old testament instead of roots, they mean the same thing.
You claimed that I have accused people of Here I will quote your own words
in essence claiming I said anyone who believes in the OT as scripture is Hebrew roots. Is WRONG. I have never made such a claim
And so it does not stop but continues. I have read some posts of yours that are truths of Christ, you do know Him.
Yeah it continues
