but then this might happen firstmaybe this is how Jesus returns
but then this might happen firstmaybe this is how Jesus returns
Your chronology is mixed up, as is typical. That happens later.If you are going with only 1, Habakkuk 2:14 would be better.
I don't know why I live rent free in your head. I was simply pointing out the greater of the two truths, and not speaking of any other matter.Your chronology is mixed up, as is typical. That happens later.
And in the millennium, it will be the King dispensing this knowledge from Zion, further the nation Israel (the nation of priests in the millennium) will be engaging in that task to great effect.
Presently, however, we are here....
Rom 1:21
Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Rom 1:25
Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Rom 1:28
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Rom 1:32
Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
The greatest Truth is that of the God-man Jesus Christ, the mystery of Godliness, Who's Name is Salvation.I don't know why I live rent free in your head. I was simply pointing out the greater of the two truths, and not speaking of any other matter.
Yes those pesky 8 chapters of Ezekiel are still giving the continuationists and preterists fits.“I will bring back my exiled people Israel; they will rebuild the ruined cities and live in them. They will plant vineyards and drink their wine; they will make gardens and eat their fruit. I will plant Israel in their own land, never again to be uprooted from the land I have given them.” (Amos 9:14–15)
“The glory of the Lord entered the temple through the gate facing east. … I heard someone speaking to me from inside the temple. He said: ‘Son of man, this is the place of my throne and the place for the soles of my feet. This is where I will live among the Israelites forever.’” (Ezekiel 43:4–7)
Jesus is the ultimate knowledge of the glory of the LORD...in Him dwells the fulness of the Godhead bodily. He is the fullest expression of the knowledge of God.The greatest Truth is that of the God-man Jesus Christ, the mystery of Godliness, Who's Name is Salvation.
Period. Full stop.
You missed it buddy.
We're past that. Get back to the thread topic - the templewell you claim your right about things, but yet ask people if they are a word that is not even in the Oxford dictionary
nope I'm past that. So I will engage if you admit your ideas may not be correctWe're past that. Get back to the thread topic - the temple
A wonderful confession.Jesus is the ultimate knowledge of the glory of the LORD...in Him dwells the fulness of the Godhead bodily. He is the fullest expression of the knowledge of God.
Rent free.A wonderful confession.
Could you now correct your doctrinal errors, then profess the Word of prophecy yet to be fulfilled in truth as well?
Because at this point....you are not.
and so @douggg you say your past this but here you are agreeing with it still.Yes those pesky 8 chapters of Ezekiel are still giving the continuationists and preterists fits.
Why don't they just edit the stuff they find offensive out of the Bible and call it a day?

well what's the difference between a partial preterist a partial futuristCould be a Partial Preterist.
nope they could both deny prophecy without realising it, because whilst prophecy is open to interpretation, it was only open to people led of the holy spirit.there is only a partial difference between a Partial Preterist and a Partial Futurist.
I would favor the Gospel as the number one.Ultimately, there is only one.
Habakkuk 2:4
You only have a partial understanding of prophecy.nope they could both deny prophecy without realising it, because whilst prophecy is open to interpretation, it was only open to people led of the holy spirit.
Which means not open to lean on your own understanding
Historically, preterists and non-preterists have generally agreed that the Jesuit Luis de Alcasar (1554–1613) wrote the first systematic preterist exposition of prophecy Vestigatio arcani sensus in Apocalypsi, published during the Counter-Reformation.[2]and so @douggg you say your past this but here you are agreeing with it still.
So why do you both call people a name that is not in the Oxford dictionary.
But yet @cv5 claims to be an educated person
View attachment 259978
Wasn't the word preterist invented by the futurist who got locked up in the asylum for the mentally insane![]()
And so if you only have a partial understanding does that make you the preterist wordYou only have a partial understanding of prophecy.