I don't know whether it is an exact number, or figurative.
uhhh, it clearly states 144,000...not figurative...literal
I don't know whether it is an exact number, or figurative.
It clearly states that we are sheep...baauhhh, it clearly states 144,000...not figurative...literal
John 6:39 does not say "all men". It says only those that his Father gave to him (John 10:27-29). Those that Christ died for on the cross were cleansed by his blood, at the time he died. They don't have to choose to be cleansed.
Christ was a sacrifice to God, FOR GOD"S ACCEPTANCE, and not to mankind, for mankind's acceptance.
John 3:16
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”
That's a specific record about specific people. Rebekah was having twins. God had to choose one over the other to carry the Christ-line. He chose Jacob.
No, that IS the truth of scriptures. God wants people who want Him.
Anyone has the capacity to believe the Gospel.
The more I read the more I lean towards Calvinism. I can’t wrap my head around it. Wouldn’t our choice to believe be a work? where does free will come in and what does the Bible say about it?? Any help is appreciated
I understand heresy when I see one. The fact that Calvinists believe in limited atonement makes a joke of the cross and chips away the blood of Jesus that is accessible for total cleansing from sin to all who believe. No buts, no ifs.
1 John 2:2 And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.It is you that is trying to make a joke of the cross. Christ did not die for all mankind, only for those that his Father gave to him (John 6:39) (John 10:27-29).
That’s true for anyone who chooses to believe the Gospel. Salvation is available to anyone.Christ's death on the cross was a sacrifice to God, for God's acceptance, and not to mankind, for mankind's acceptance. What happened on the cross was a total cleansing from their sins. No buts, no if's.
I have, several times. You don’t believe them as they are written, but spin them to fit with Calvinism.Are you quoting from yourself, or from scripture, if from scripture, then list them.
There are plenty of people in the Bible, and in life today, who did and do search for God.So you are saying that the first process of salvation is the person choosing. Doesn't that contradict the bible scripture that says that nobody searches for God?
God chooses people who choose Him. He wants everyone to be saved (1 Tim 2:4; 2 Pet 3:9).
So are you saying that Christ was a sacrifice to the Father for the acceptance of those that the Father chooses ( that the Father gave to Him )?
I have, several times. You don’t believe them as they are written, but spin them to fit with Calvinism.
John 3:16 does not say “world of believers.” You’re changing the Bible to fit your theology.The "all men" in 1 Tim 2:4, is the same as "the world of believers" in John 3:16.
There are plenty of people in the Bible, and in life today, who did and do search for God.
It never goes anywhere. Nobody ever changes their mind. You’re convinced Calvinism is true, and you’re not going to see it any other way.Is not the title of this forum "Bible discussion forum"? So, let's discuss scripture. All scripture must harmonize in order to glean the truth of Jesus doctrine.
So according to you people who never heard the Gospel know God nonetheless. Seems like God’s grace is sufficient for such people.For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
To borrow a line from you, I don’t respond to posts that don’t contain scripture backing your statements.The only people, back then, and now, that will search for knowledge of God, are those that have been quickened by God to the new spiritual life, with the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.
It was God's sovereign will that the PROMISE will follow from a strict, chosen, Jewish, bloodline.The children of the promise are Christian.
When Paul was discussing the fact that the promise does not follow down every bloodline, what do you think he was illustrating?
Jewish conversion to Jesus Christ and the sanctification that the Holy Spirit endows.When Paul mentions in Rom 2 that an outward Jew is not a Jew, what do you think he was talking about?
Correct but Paul is still tracing the bloodline of the chosen Jewish lineage. May I say that many in Israel are of Israel.Look at Rom 9 again. In Rom 9:6 he states "not all of Israel are Israel".
Read the genealogy given in Luke 3. There is a very long list of Jewish names given in that bloodline, God chose that specific bloodline for a purpose.In Rom 9:7 he gives an example about how the identity is not passed by bloodline alone.
True but Sarah will have a son.In Rom 9:8 he states "that is to say those of bloodline are not children of God, but those of the promise are counted for the heirs".
God bound everyone over to disobedience so that He can have mercy on them all. (Romans 11:32)In Rom 9:17 he explains that God will sometimes raise people up to think they are so great for the purpose of making an example of them, to demonstrate His power and His mercy. This would mean it would be completely consistent with His designs to raise antiChrist Jews into high power solely for the purpose of making an example of them.
Your trying to undermine the genealogy of the Christ, the promised one.If you fixate on cherry-picked words, it is easy to miss the nuance of what he is talking about. He isn't saying that all descendants of Isaac are chosen/elect/etc. He is stating that the promised are only a subset of descendants and not elect on the basis of merely bloodline. If you look deeper into scripture you will find that it is only those in Christ that are heirs to the promise. Not all of Israel are Israel, this exclusion is not limited to nonIsaac descendants.