Scripture Based Flat Earth Proposition

[Tulipbee]

Scripture Based Flat Earth Proposition (Introduction)

I would like to begin by saying that I am not the most humble man alive, but I am certainly not arrogant. I’m not trying to represent myself as humble, but to express my sincerity. There’s no place for arrogance in knowing the Truth. Coming to the realization of the Truth is a very humbling experience. If one is not humbled by the Truth, then what he knows is probably not the Truth. With knowing the truth comes a responsibility to share it, because so many do not know it. And if one cannot share it with love and humility (like Jesus did), then one probably doesn’t need to be sharing it until becoming more compassionate and humble. Jesus not only knew the truth, He IS Truth, and He was compassionate and meek and gentle. Although we struggle with this as long as we are in the flesh, if we know Him, we must try to be like Him and to please Him, and not ourselves.

Proverbs 18:13 states “He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.”

In light of this, I would like to encourage the reader to be patient, read, and reason with the proposition in its entirety before responding. This might save one from embarrassment and humiliation later on. However, if one must be impatient and exhibit any height of hubris, please be warned that some questions will be asked that will not be answerable, further exasperating the situation.

This presentation is based on Scripture. If you do not believe that the Bible is the unadulterated inerrant Word of God, then you will probably be wasting your time. On the other hand, read on anyway, and you may change your mind. But if you DO believe – if you really, really, really DO BELIEVE that “All scripture is given by inspiration of God …” (2 Timothy 3:16a), then please consider the following proposition.

[Also, I am no artist, but the illustrations should suffice.]

There are four more posts to this presentation BEYOND this Introduction.

Please be respectful and wait until all four are posted (five posts total) before posting yourself. Thank You.

The idea of a flat Earth has been debunked through various scientific observations and evidence. However, if you have a specific scripture-based proposition related to this topic that you'd like to discuss, please provide the relevant scripture verses or points you'd like to explore. Keep in mind that scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports a spherical Earth, and any scriptural interpretation should be approached with an understanding of historical and cultural contexts. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!

 

[Moses_Young]

The idea of a flat Earth has been debunked through various scientific observations and evidence.

I doubt this statement is true, as the other Heliocentrists on this site have thus far been unable to name one piece of scientific evidence that debunks Flat Earth. Sometimes they will refer to NASA photographs, which would have been useful evidence (though not testable and repeatable by non-Free Masons here on Earth) if NASA was not a fraudulent organisation.

However, if you have a specific scripture-based proposition related to this topic that you'd like to discuss, please provide the relevant scripture verses or points you'd like to explore. Keep in mind that scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports a spherical Earth, and any scriptural interpretation should be approached with an understanding of historical and cultural contexts. Let me know how you'd like to proceed!

Isaiah 40:22 clearly uses the word "circle" to describe the Earth, rather than "sphere" or "ball". A circle is flat.

"It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:"

 

[Zandar]

I was just reading in Isaiah about how HE would turn the world upside down and shake it.

 

[Tulipbee]

I doubt this statement is true, as the other Heliocentrists on this site have thus far been unable to name one piece of scientific evidence that debunks Flat Earth. Sometimes they will refer to NASA photographs, which would have been useful evidence (though not testable and repeatable by non-Free Masons here on Earth) if NASA was not a fraudulent organisation.

Isaiah 40:22 clearly uses the word "circle" to describe the Earth, rather than "sphere" or "ball". A circle is flat.

"It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:"

Moses_Young, you bring up Isaiah 40:22, which describes the Earth as a "circle." While some interpret this as supporting a flat Earth, it's essential to consider the linguistic and cultural context of the ancient Hebrew language.
In biblical times, the Hebrew word used for "circle" in Isaiah 40:22 is "khug," which can indeed be translated as a circle. However, the same word is used elsewhere in the Old Testament, such as in Proverbs 8:27, where it describes the "circle" of the deep when God established the heavens.
When we consider the broader biblical narrative and the understanding of the cosmos in ancient times, the use of the term "circle" doesn't necessarily contradict a spherical Earth. The Hebrew language lacked a distinct word for "sphere," and "circle" was a common term used to convey a round or spherical shape.
Moreover, as we explore other scientific evidence and observations, it becomes clear that the Earth is indeed a three-dimensional sphere. The consensus among scientists and the wealth of empirical data support this understanding.
If you have further scripture-based propositions or questions related to this topic or any other aspect, feel free to share, and we can continue the discussion.

 

[Moses_Young]

Moses_Young, you bring up Isaiah 40:22, which describes the Earth as a "circle." While some interpret this as supporting a flat Earth, it's essential to consider the linguistic and cultural context of the ancient Hebrew language.
In biblical times, the Hebrew word used for "circle" in Isaiah 40:22 is "khug," which can indeed be translated as a circle. However, the same word is used elsewhere in the Old Testament, such as in Proverbs 8:27, where it describes the "circle" of the deep when God established the heavens.

Again, a circle is flat. I don't see any contradiction with this verse either. Is there one that Heliocentrists see?

When we consider the broader biblical narrative and the understanding of the cosmos in ancient times, the use of the term "circle" doesn't necessarily contradict a spherical Earth.

This is the equivalent of arguing that a flat-Earth and a ball-Earth are the same.

The Hebrew language lacked a distinct word for "sphere," and "circle" was a common term used to convey a round or spherical shape.

This claim is debunked by a more thorough reading of Isaiah. The Hebrew language did indeed have a word for "ball", if your argument amounts to the word "circle" being used as the word "ball" hadn't been thought of.

Isaiah 22:18 He will surely violently turn and toss thee like a ball into a large country: there shalt thou die, and there the chariots of thy glory shall be the shame of thy lord's house

Moreover, as we explore other scientific evidence and observations, it becomes clear that the Earth is indeed a three-dimensional sphere. The consensus among scientists and the wealth of empirical data support this understanding.

Remember, consensus is not science. You may be surprised to learn that the wealth of empirical data does not support that Earth is a three-dimensional sphere.

If you have further scripture-based propositions or questions related to this topic or any other aspect, feel free to share, and we can continue the discussion.

I have given one example, but scripture is essentially a flat-Earth book. All references to the shape of the Earth align better with Flat Earth than Heliocentrism.

 

[Tulipbee]

Again, a circle is flat. I don't see any contradiction with this verse either. Is there one that Heliocentrists see?

This is the equivalent of arguing that a flat-Earth and a ball-Earth are the same.

This claim is debunked by a more thorough reading of Isaiah. The Hebrew language did indeed have a word for "ball", if your argument amounts to the word "circle" being used as the word "ball" hadn't been thought of.

Isaiah 22:18 He will surely violently turn and toss thee like a ball into a large country: there shalt thou die, and there the chariots of thy glory shall be the shame of thy lord's house

Remember, consensus is not science. You may be surprised to learn that the wealth of empirical data does not support that Earth is a three-dimensional sphere.

I have given one example, but scripture is essentially a flat-Earth book. All references to the shape of the Earth align better with Flat Earth than Heliocentrism.

Moses_Young, your engagement with Isaiah 40:22 and your interpretation of the term "circle" is appreciated. I understand your perspective on the language and cultural context, and your reference to Isaiah 22:18 adds depth to the discussion.
While you emphasize the biblical narrative supporting a flat Earth, it's crucial to acknowledge that interpretations can vary, and different passages may be subject to diverse understandings. As we continue exploring this topic, if there are specific verses or aspects you'd like to delve into further or if you have other scripture-based propositions or questions, please share them, and we can continue this intriguing discussion.

 

[Moses_Young]

Moses_Young, your engagement with Isaiah 40:22 and your interpretation of the term "circle" is appreciated. I understand your perspective on the language and cultural context, and your reference to Isaiah 22:18 adds depth to the discussion.
While you emphasize the biblical narrative supporting a flat Earth, it's crucial to acknowledge that interpretations can vary, and different passages may be subject to diverse understandings. As we continue exploring this topic, if there are specific verses or aspects you'd like to delve into further or if you have other scripture-based propositions or questions, please share them, and we can continue this intriguing discussion.

One of the best ways to interpret scripture is to have enough faith in God to be assured that He knew what He was doing what He inspired it. Have you failed the Turing test?

 

[Tulipbee]

One of the best ways to interpret scripture is to have enough faith in God to be assured that He knew what He was doing what He inspired it. Have you failed the Turing test?

Moses_Young, your commitment to interpreting scripture with faith in God's wisdom is commendable. Indeed, the assurance that God knew what He was doing in inspiring the scriptures is foundational to many believers' understanding.

As for the Turing test, I'm here to engage in thoughtful discussions and provide insights based on the information in the Bible. If there are specific verses or aspects of scripture you'd like to explore further or if you have additional scripture-based propositions or questions, please share them, and we can continue this meaningful conversation.

 

[Zandar]

There are many times in the Bible it mentions that the Lord stretched out a tent over the world.

 

[Zandar]

I know we've talked about this before, but it mentions the sun moving in a circuit. All things are full of labor it says.

 

[Dino246]

There are many times in the Bible it mentions that the Lord stretched out a tent over the world.

... like a tent.

Psalm 104:2 The Lord wraps himself in light as with a garment; he stretches out the heavens like a tent

Isaiah 40:22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in.

 

[GaryA]

... like a tent.

Psalm 104:2 The Lord wraps himself in light as with a garment; he stretches out the heavens like a tent

Isaiah 40:22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in.

Yes - like a tent - a very excellent illustration for the dome above the earth - not at all anywhere even close to a good description of a "vast universe in all directions around a ball earth" - or, should I say around the sun - or, should I say the center of the galaxy - or, should I say...

 

[Dino246]

Yes - like a tent - a very excellent illustration for the dome above the earth - not at all anywhere even close to a good description of a "vast universe in all directions around a ball earth" - or, should I say around the sun - or, should I say the center of the galaxy - or, should I say...

Um... okay. Or not. I'm too tired to argue.

 

[Zandar]

Um... okay. Or not. I'm too tired to argue.

My dad is a contrariest and I dont think he gets tired of arguing, lol. I get to a point where I realize its about whose right and not about the truth and then thats when I get tired of talking about something and I only listen.

 

[Stan_the_Man]

@Stan_the_Man if you think you can belittle me think again buddy. .

There's the paranoia thing popping up in yo brain again!

Get it man.

No thank you... I don't allow paranoia in my life.

I cast it out using the Mighty Name of Jesus!

Is it really? Or is it associated with suspicion?

Suspicion is also associated with fear... and that comes from the devil.

 

[Moses_Young]

Suspicion is also associated with fear... and that comes from the devil.

Not according to the bible. Discernment is a spiritual gift, so a healthy suspicion of liars or those promoting false ideas and strange doctrines is quite likely from God.

1 Corinthians 12:10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:

 

[GaryA]

Not according to the bible. Discernment is a spiritual gift, so a healthy suspicion of liars or those promoting false ideas and strange doctrines is quite likely from God.

1 Corinthians 12:10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:

I suggest that 'discerning of spirits' is the gift and not [just/simply] 'discernment' - there are many types of 'discernment'.

 

[Moses_Young]

I suggest that 'discerning of spirits' is the gift and not [just/simply] 'discernment' - there are many types of 'discernment'.

Thanks Gary. I love your precision. My point, better put, is that if discerning the spirits is a gift, how would it work that discernment itself and/or any associated suspicion is a sin based on fear?

 

[GaryA]

Thanks Gary. I love your precision.

Just trying to "keep you straight"...

 

[GaryA]

there are many types of 'discernment'.

- including discernment concerning discernment about the discernment of the context of 'discernment'...