This is not the place to accuse another poster of not being saved. Why don't you provide for all your gospel. Show us where your gospel is superior.Is anyone gonna confront BenFTW's gospel-less salvation besides me?
Here are all the posts you've ever written on CC.You shall know them by their love for one another........but not here.
I am still waiting on you to explain how God was found by those who didn't seek for Him.
First, Sov did not say Ben wasn't saved. Read it again.This is not the place to accuse another poster of not being saved. Why don't you provide for all your gospel. Show us where your gospel is superior.
Tell me about the blood of Christ, the grace of God and how to receive this great gift of eternal salvation. I suggest that you cease running down other posters and start lifting up Christ.
You read a book about mysticism so good for you. Now you judge everybody but you to be a mystic.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
See you hit the nail right on the head. Israel thought because they were elect they had an inheritance in the kingdom of God. The Calvinist operates the same way. Declaring themselves to be elect they believe they have an inheritance in heaven.Our relationship with the Lord is never DNA. It's a legal act. We're either adopted or not.
Just what do you call a "gospel-less salvation"? I said he read a book on the subject and is now making universal application.First, Sov did not say Ben wasn't saved. Read it again.
Second, why isn't this the place where we can or can't say if another is saved? Do you really want babes in Christ being fed by those who don't even know the Lord?
And, third, mysticism? Where did you pull that one out of the hat, and how is Sov being mystic? (Speaking of being judge and jury.)
I don't see where Ben said anything about salvation here. I do see where he said "at the very least acknowledging that God exists through the glory of His creation". (For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. Rom. 1:20)] That is why I "liked" his post. Ben acknowledged that "it may be time before they come to the knowledge of Jesus Christ, however" - which would be through the gospel preached.
Just what do you call a "gospel-less salvation"? I said he read a book on the subject and is now making universal application.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Go back and reread it. He said at least some convert that way. Ummm, no they don't. Also, acknowledging God exists is non-sequitor. Those who have not heard the gospel never had a bible in their hand, never had someone witness to them, does not wake up one day, look at the sky and think, "God sent His Son to live a sinless life on my behalf, died in my stead, arose three days later, ascended to the Father, and is coming again." That's the gospel per 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 that Ben and Roger mock by saying some can be converted without it. That's mysticism.
Also, the Primitive Baptists, who hold to the TULIP, believe ppl are not saved by the gospel. They say the gospel gives light to the Christ, who saves them. I have a dead friend who is an Old Regular Baptist that is of the Primitive Baptist faith and order, and he, and many others, stated that ppl are saved without the gospel. That's rubbish.
This is not the place to accuse another poster of not being saved. Why don't you provide for all your gospel. Show us where your gospel is superior.
Tell me about the blood of Christ, the grace of God and how to receive this great gift of eternal salvation. I suggest that you cease running down other posters and start lifting up Christ.
You read a book about mysticism so good for you. Now you judge everybody but you to be a mystic.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Oops. Dear friend, not dead friend.
I will say a prayer for your dead friend.![]()
Free Will in the Bible
Mt 23:37
37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
The Holy Bible: King James Version. (2009). (Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version., Mt 23:37). Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
Here we have God willing to gather Jerusalem like a hen gathers her brood but Jerusalem exercised free will and would not be gathered.
Gen 3:22
22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
The Holy Bible: King James Version. (2009). (Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version., Ge 3:21–22). Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
Man was sinless and God willed that he not eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil but man exercised free will and ate of the tree.
Dt 30:19-20
19 I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live: 20 That thou mayest love the LORD thy God, and that thou mayest obey his voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto him: for he is thy life, and the length of thy days: that thou mayest dwell in the land which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.
The Holy Bible: King James Version. (2009). (Electronic Edition of the 1900 Authorized Version., Dt 30:19–20). Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
Here God clearly gives Israel a choice.
I never said a man could be saved apart from the gospel of Christ. Romans one teaches that men are without excuse before God because all of creation testifies of Gods existence. If there is a God them man is obliged to seek Him. This is evidenced in the historical fact that men create gods if they lack knowledge of God who is God. The gospel has at one time or another encompassed the entire world. There is no excuse for men not to know of God who is God.I never said I read a book about a gospel-less salvation. But when we show you many died w/o hearing it, just like Old Faithful, you guys chime in with Romans 1. Yet, natural revelation does not reveal the cross of the God's Christ. It does not tell them the gospel. If ppl, who never heard the gospel, are saved by what they see, then it's a gospel-less salvation. Something that you and Ben adhere to...a gospel-less salvation.
I'm glad to hear that you are not accusing Ben of not being saved.I never said Ben was not saved. Keep up, man, and don't flippantly blame ppl. Ben said that some ppl can be saved by acknowledging God exists via natural revelation. Ummm, no they can not. Ppl are saved by the gospel and that is done by ppl of God.
Here are all the posts you've ever written on CC.
Can you show me even one where you showed love? Just one?
Here are all the posts you've ever written on CC.
Can you show me even one where you showed love? Just one?
"at least some convert that way" . . . I don't claim to know EXACTLY what Ben meant by that phrase but from his other post I do know that he believes people have to come to Christ . . . that there is no other name under heaven whereby we must be saved . . . It is not right to pick out just that phrase and say that he is saying there is "another gospel". His complete sentence was - "At least, some people convert this way, at the very least acknowledging that God exists. It may be time before they come to the knowledge of Jesus Christ, however." Convert does not mean repent - a person who has been persuaded to change their religious faith or other beliefs . . . So, IOW, he is saying that through the glory of His creation, intelligent design, through observation, some will, at least, acknowledge God exists . . . THEN come to the knowledge of Jesus Christ.Go back and reread it. He said at least some convert that way. Ummm, no they don't. Also, acknowledging God exists is non-sequitor. Those who have not heard the gospel never had a bible in their hand, never had someone witness to them, does not wake up one day, look at the sky and think, "God sent His Son to live a sinless life on my behalf, died in my stead, arose three days later, ascended to the Father, and is coming again." That's the gospel per 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 that Ben and Roger mock by saying some can be converted without it. That's mysticism.
Also, the Primitive Baptists, who hold to the TULIP, believe ppl are not saved by the gospel. They say the gospel gives light to the Christ, who saves them. I have a dead friend who is an Old Regular Baptist that is of the Primitive Baptist faith and order, and he, and many others, stated that ppl are saved without the gospel. That's rubbish.
Do you serve a big shovel and some waist-high waders with your thick manure?See you hit the nail right on the head. Israel thought because they were elect they had an inheritance in the kingdom of God. The Calvinist operates the same way. Declaring themselves to be elect they believe they have an inheritance in heaven.
Then I will pray for God's mercy on you. (As in your meekness and humility rivals Donald Trump's.)God adopts not the proud and haughty but the meek and submissive. The soul that prostrates itself before a Holy and Just God. The soul that sees itself as justly due condemnation and seeks the mercy and grace of God for forgiveness. A soul that feels the great weight of sin and feels the heat of the fire of eternal condemnation. The soul that is so weak it cannot live that is the soul that Christ in mercy reaches down and lifts up and saves.
For the cause of Christ
Roger